Сборщик RSS-лент
Top XRP Ledger Developments Investors Should Be Aware Of
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) continues to evolve as Ripple pushes forward with new technical upgrades to strengthen network reliability, expand future use cases, and improve overall network performance. A recently released amendment report highlights several key developments that investors may want to track closely, as these could spark significant changes for the network by 2026.
Upcoming XRP Ledger DevelopmentsRipple rolled out the XRPL version 3.0.0 earlier this month, introducing five new amendments currently under review by validators. These proposed changes directly address issues related to price-oracle sorting, token-escrow accounting errors, missing ledger-entry files, Automated Market Maker (AMM) rounding issues, and more.
Investors are paying close attention to these amendments, as they directly affect asset pricing, accounting, and tracking on the XRP Ledger. These areas can also influence risk assessment and confidence among market participants.
The five active amendments in Rippled 3.0.0, currently open for voting by January 2026, include:
- fixAMMClawbackRounding
- fixIncludeKeyletFields
- fixMPTDeliveredAmount
- fixPriceOracleOrder
- fixTokenEscrowV1
Firstly, the fixAMMClawbackRounding amendment resolves an accounting issue that can occur during AMM clawback transactions involving the final Liquidity Provider (LP) token holder. Previously, rounding errors could create mismatches between AMM balances and trust lines. The newly proposed update ensures these balances remain aligned, allowing invariant checks to function correctly.
The second amendment, fixIncludeKeyletFields, adds missing identifying fields to several ledger entries. This includes escrow and payment channel sequence numbers, owner fields for signer lists, and document IDs for Oracle entries. The update makes it easier to reference and manage objects within the XRP Ledger.
The fixMPTDeliveredAmount amendment restores missing DeliveredAmount metadata for direct Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPT) payment transactions. While payments already deliver the correct amounts, the added metadata from the proposed update makes it easier for investors and developers to see and verify what was actually delivered.
To ensure more reliable price data, the fixPriceOracleOrder amendment addresses inconsistencies in how asset pairs are ordered in price oracle entries. By enforcing a consistent order, the change allows applications and users to look up asset prices seamlessly.
The final amendment, fixTokenEscrowV1, aims to improve accounting accuracy. It corrects an error affecting MPT escrows that include transfer fees. The update ensures that issuer-locked balances and the total supply are reduced by the correct net amounts when escrowed tokens are unlocked, improving the transparency of XRPL.
XRPL Plans New Institutional Lending Protocol By 2026Edward Hennis, a software engineer at Ripple, has announced an upcoming XRPL Lending Protocol that is set to transform on-ledger lending. According to Hennis, the protocol will offer fixed-term, fixed-rate, and underwritten credit designed for institutions.
In his post on X, the Ripple engineer revealed that each loan on the ledger will operate within a Single Asset Vault that isolates risks and allows either private or public contributions. He stated that the protocol is expected to be available for voting by January 2026. Hennis also revealed that Market Makers, PSPs, and fintech lenders will be able to access XRP and RLUSD for a range of institutional use cases through the upcoming lending protocol.
Россиянка потеряла более 2 млн рублей на фейковом криптотрейдинге
Рынок возвращается к биткоину в моменты страха — аналитики Messari
Гонконг ужесточает требования к криптодилерам и кастодиальным сервисам
XRP See Renewed Buying Activity From Large Investors – Here How Much They’ve Bought
Ongoing volatility across the cryptocurrency market continues to hamper XRP from posting a rally, as recent upward attempts face significant resistance at the $2 price level. However, this persistent downward trend has not entirely crushed the sentiment of investors, especially whale holders.
Large Holders Of XRP Are Stepping Back InXRP has been in a downward trend for the past few weeks due to a market drawdown in October. After several weeks of subdued price performance and failed upward attempts, key investors are beginning to exhibit positive sentiment towards the leading altcoin.
As observed in the report from Steph is Crypto, a market expert and trader, large investors, also known as whale holders, are making their presence felt once again. Despite the ongoing bearish action of the XRP’s price, there is a steady resurgence in accumulation among the cohort.
While this shift signals growing confidence of deep-pocket investors, it also suggests that they are likely repositioning themselves in anticipation of a broader market move upward. When whale investors start to buy again, it often precedes upward spikes, which raises the question of whether the accumulation could serve as the foundation for the altcoin’s next major direction.
According to the expert, the renewed buying pressure is triggered by large investors holding between 100 million XRP and 1 billion XRP. After days of significant adoption from the group, the total number of coins held by them grew from 8.11 billion to 8.23 billion XRP, valued at approximately $150 million.
A similar resurgence in sentiment and investor activity is also observed among those holding between 10 million and 100 million XRP. Data from the chart shows that these investors now hold about 10.90 billion compared to the 10.88 billion a few days ago.
Despite large investors buying again, Steph is Crypto believes that the renewed accumulation is more of a cautious move than a bullish move. However, should the trend continue over the following days or weeks, the altcoin may attract enough momentum for an upward move.
Nearly Half Of The Supply In LossWith XRP’s price declining and trading below the $2 mark, a lot of coins are starting to show major losses. According to on-chain data, the profitability of holders has sharply declined amid the ongoing bearish phase. In a previous post, Steph is Crypto highlighted that nearly 50% of the altcoin’s total supply is now underwater, suggesting a shift in attitude where patience and selectivity are replacing optimism.
The chart shared by the expert shows that the share of XRP supply currently in profit has dropped to 52% following weeks of consistent declines. While nearly half of the total supply held by investors is sitting at a loss, this development increases the risk of panic-driven selling pressure during periods of weakness, as seen in the past.
However, this cooling in profitability often marks a pivotal phase, as it could still act as a trigger for a notable rally in the upcoming days or weeks. According to the expert, the last time profitability dropped to this level was in November 2024, just before a major upside expansion.
Майк Новограц назвал условие выживания криптопроектов
Основатель Ripple попросил операторов криптокошельков делать поменьше обновлений
Ripple’s XRP Ledger Just Did Something Bitcoin Has Never Done
Developers on Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) have revealed progress on making the network quantum-resistant. This comes as some Bitcoin advocates and developers downplay the imminent risk posed by quantum computing, stating that it is unlikely to be a concern anytime soon.
Ripple’s XRP Ledger Works On Quantum-Resistant CodeIn an X post, Ripple’s XRP Ledger validator Vet revealed that developers are already working on quantum-resistant code on the network. This came as he drew attention to a fully quantum-proof XRPL, including consensus, which is currently in testnet. This marks progress for the network, even as it achieves something that networks like Bitcoin still lag on.
Vet indicated that creating a quantum-proof XRP Ledger is likely to come with some disadvantages for the network. He stated that one of the downsides of these encryptions is the size of the signatures. He shared a video showing that transaction signatures for payment on the quantum XRPL are much longer than on the XRPL mainnet.
Vet’s post followed the revelation by XRPL Labs engineer Dennis Angell that the AlphaNet, the developer network for XRPL, is now fully quantum-secure. Angell mentioned that the testnet now has quantum consensus, quantum accounts, quantum transactions, and dilithium cryptography. He further remarked that they had added native smart contracts while declaring that the quantum-resistant future of blockchain is live.
Notably, this move comes as Ripple and the XRP Ledger look to onboard more institutions onto the network. Concerns about quantum computing are on the rise, with Bitcoin in the spotlight at the moment, as developers have yet to make meaningful progress on making the flagship crypto quantum-resistant.
Following the XRP Ledger’s progress on making the network quantum-resistant, crypto pundit Jenna questioned the possibility of Bitcoin investors selling their BTC because it’s not quantum-resistant and then buying XRP because it is safer. Another pundit, Mickle, also noted how the XRP Ledger is already pretty much quantum-proof while Bitcoiners argue over whether quantum computing is real or not.
Why Working Towards Quantum-Resistant Transactions MattersIn an X post, crypto pundit Sandip noted that blockchains such as Bitcoin, XRP Ledger, and Ethereum rely on ECDSA cryptography. This puts them at risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically break them in the future. He then remarked that testing this early ensures the network is future-proofed against the time when quantum computers become powerful enough to break these networks.
Meanwhile, Sandip explained that these XRP Ledger developers are testing optional and upgradeable signature schemes. This will ensure that wallets and validators can later support post-quantum keys. It also enables a smooth migration before quantum risk becomes real. The pundit added that this is long-term infrastructure planning, not price manipulation, as it puts the XRPL ahead of many competitors, including Bitcoin.
Venture capitalist Nic Carter, who has been very vocal about the quantum risk to Bitcoin, has explained why it is important to start preparing against this risk from now. He highlighted how there are several decisions to be made and processes to be taken if developers are to successfully make the flagship crypto quantum-resistant.
Топ-менеджер Kraken объявил о наступлении «эпохи токенизации»
Trust Wallet Hacked: What Crypto Users Should Do Now
Trust Wallet says a “security incident” hit only one slice of its product stack: the Chrome browser extension on version 2.68. If you are a mobile-only user, the company says you’re not affected. If you are on any other extension version, the company says you’re not affected either. The problem, per Trust Wallet’s own wording, is tightly scoped, even if the fallout doesn’t feel that way when you’re staring at an emptied address.
The first public flare went up on Dec. 25 via on-chain investigator ZachXBT, who posted a Telegram warning that “a number of Trust Wallet users have reported that funds were drained from wallet addresses within the past couple of hours.”
He stressed that “the exact root cause has not been determined,” then pointed out an uncomfortable coincidence: “the Trust Wallet Chrome extension pushed a new update yesterday.” In the same message, he asked victims to DM him on X so he could “update the list of theft addresses below as I verify more,” and he began publishing alleged theft destinations across multiple chains. His list included multiple EVM addresses and a Solana address.
NEW: @zachxbt SAYS “A NUMBER OF TRUST WALLET USERS HAVE REPORTED THAT FUNDS WERE DRAINED FROM WALLET ADDRESSES WITHIN THE PAST COUPLE OF HOURS”
SOURCE: https://t.co/4shDweZnJF pic.twitter.com/MkbQWZKGCc
— DEGEN NEWS (@DegenerateNews) December 25, 2025
Trust Wallet Confirms The HackThe wallet firm later confirmed the incident on X. “We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69,” the company wrote, linking users to the official Chrome Web Store listing.
It added: “Please note: Mobile-only users and all other browser extension versions are not impacted.” The post closed with the kind of line every security team ends up typing sooner or later: “We understand how concerning this is and our team is actively working on the issue. We’ll keep sharing updates as soon as possible.”
Then the guidance got more urgent, and more specific. Trust Wallet warned users who hadn’t updated to 2.69: “please do not open the Browser Extension until you have updated. This may help to ensure the security of your wallet and prevent further issues.”
We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69.
Please refer to the official Chrome Webstore link here: https://t.co/V3vMq31TKb
Please note: Mobile-only users…
— Trust Wallet (@TrustWallet) December 25, 2025
In a follow-up, it spelled out a step-by-step that boils down to: don’t open the extension, go to Chrome’s extensions page for Trust Wallet, toggle it off if it’s still on, enable Developer mode, hit “Update,” and confirm you’re on version 2.69 before doing anything else. It’s not glamorous, but it’s actionable, which is what matters when you’re in incident mode.
As the claims and counterclaims swirled, cybersecurity firm PeckShield put an early dollar figure on the damage. “The Trust Wallet exploit has drained >$6M worth of cryptos from victims,” PeckShield wrote, adding that while about “~$2.8M of the stolen funds remain in the hacker’s wallets (Bitcoin/EVM/Solana), the bulk – >$4M in cryptos – has been sent to CEXs,” with a breakdown of “~$3.3M to ChangeNOW, ~$340K to Fixed Float, & ~$447K to Kucoin.”
One more pressure point surfaced quickly: compensation. ZachXBT said, “I currently have many concerned victims contacting me via DM so can your team please clarify if you will be offering any compensation for Trust Wallet Browser Extension users.” Trust Wallet did not answer that directly in public. Instead, it replied that its customer support team was already in touch with impacted users regarding next steps and directed people to reach out via its support channel.
So what should users do now, in plain terms? If you are on extension version 2.68, Trust Wallet’s instruction is to stop using it as-is: disable it and upgrade to 2.69 before you open it again. If you think you were affected, the company is routing users to support, while independent investigator ZachXBT is asking for reports to help map theft flows.
UPDATE: Binance founder Changpeng Zhao confirmed via X that user will be compensated for the hack. “So far, $7m affected by this hack. Trust Wallet will cover. User funds are SAFU. Appreciate your understanding for any inconveniences caused. The team is still investigating how hackers were able to submit a new version,” Zhao wrote today.
At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.95 trillion.
Экс-глава Alameda Research Кэролайн Эллисон выйдет из тюрьмы досрочно
Гендиректор Strategy: «Цена биткоина не всегда поддается объяснению»
Бенджамин Коуэн: Эфир вряд ли достигнет прежних высот в 2026 году
Crypto’s High-Stakes Corner Booms As Derivatives Trading Soars To $86 Trillion
According to a report by liquidation tracker CoinGlass, cryptocurrency derivatives trading hit roughly $85.7 trillion in 2025, an average of about $264 billion a day. That surge put derivatives back at the center of crypto activity and left a clear imprint on markets worldwide.
Market Concentration And Exchange ShareBinance handled roughly $25 trillion of that volume, or about 29% of global derivatives trading. OKX, Bybit and Bitget each posted between $8 trillion and $10 trillion, and the four of them together controlled about 62% of the market.
Based on reports, that level of concentration means a handful of platforms still drive most of the action, and any major hiccup at one of them can ripple through other venues fast.
Crypto: Institutional Pathways ExpandedTrading moved beyond retail bets. Spot ETFs listed in the US, options desks and compliant futures helped mainstream venues such as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange gain ground. The CME had already overtaken Binance in Bitcoin futures open interest in 2024, and it consolidated that position through 2025.
More institutions started using derivatives for hedging and basis trades rather than pure speculation. That change pushed pricing patterns to look more like traditional markets, even as new risks built up under the surface.
Open Interest And Market SwingsOpen interest began the year near a low of about $87 billion after a broad round of deleveraging in the first quarter. It then climbed through the middle of the year and reached a record $236 billion on October 7.
An abrupt reset in early Q4 wiped out more than $70 billion in positions — roughly one-third of the open interest at the time. Even after that shock, year-end open interest stood at $145 billion, a 17% rise from where the year began.
Bitcoin Price ActionMeanwhile, Bitcoin’s price has yet to breach the $90k level, trading at $89,950 at the time of writing. US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs, on the other hand, recorded net outflows, weakening what some had called the institutional bid. A record-sized Bitcoin options expiry landed on Friday, Dec 26, and several analysts argued it kept price pinned in a tighter band — at least for a while.
Sentiment gauges stayed on the gloomy side, with many investors showing caution despite broader product access and more regulated routes to trade.
Forced LiquidationsTotal forced liquidations across the year were estimated at about $150 billion. A big portion of the pain came on Oct. 10 and Oct. 11, when more than $19 billion was erased in just two days.
The data for 2025 shows a market that has grown in size and in institutional involvement, while also carrying structural tensions. Trading volumes and product variety have increased, but so have the paths that can transmit shocks.
Featured image from FXLeaders, chart from TradingView
Сбербанк выдал майнинговой компании обеспеченный криптовалютой кредит
Артур Хейс: Вот почему в новом году биткоин может стоить $750 000
Чанпэн Чжао предложил меры против мошенничества с подменой адресов криптокошельков
CZ Responds After Bitcoin Briefly ‘Crashes’ To $24,000 On Binance
Changpeng “CZ” Zhao pushed back after a screenshot showing bitcoin at roughly $24,111 on Binance went viral on X, arguing the move was a microstructure glitch on a thin, newly listed BTC/USD1 pair rather than a broader market crash and that the exchange itself “is NOT involved in trades.”
Did Bitcoin Really Crash To $24,000?The sharp wick appeared isolated to BTC/USD1, a market quoted in USD1, a stablecoin launched by Trump family-backed World Liberty Financial. Within seconds, the pair snapped back toward prevailing bitcoin prices above $87,000, according to exchange data cited by traders sharing the screenshot.
CZ’s explanation was straightforward: on an illiquid order book, a single aggressive order can print an extreme price before arbitrage closes the gap. “This actually shows the exchange is NOT involved in trades. Low liquidity on new pairs means one large market order can spike prices, but arbitrageurs quickly corrected it. No liquidations occurred, as this pair isn’t included in any index.”
The Binance founder shared a breakdown from Head of Business Development of Solv Protocol Catherine Chan who said the move was “a liquidity event,” not a bitcoin collapse. She tied the dislocation to a Binance-and-USD1 promotion offering a 20% fixed APY deposit deal that, she claimed, pushed users to swap USDT into USD1 and briefly drove USD1 to a premium.
“Many users swapped USDT → USD1, pushing USD1 to a 0.39% premium: huge for a stablecoin. Smart money borrowed USD1 on @lista_dao against SolvBTC or SolvBTC-BTCB smart lending markets (~0.5% APY). They either deposited USD1 directly or sold it slowly on spot to meet demand. Then someone thought: ‘Why not just sell via BTC/USD1?’ They used a market order. Problem: BTC/USD1 has very thin liquidity. That market order wiped out most buy orders, briefly causing a very low price,” Catherine explained.
“Arbitrage bots instantly bought it back,” she wrote. “No fundamentals changed. No mass liquidations.”
The episode also picked up a familiar edge of crypto paranoia. One user, Bera (@doomsdart), framed it as a coordinated signal: “Cz and Trump family are telling us what they’re gonna do to our coins. Get ready.” CZ’s reply, by contrast, suggested the opposite — that the speed of arbitrage, and the absence of cascading liquidations, is evidence the venue wasn’t “printing” a market-wide price at all.
For traders, the takeaway is less dramatic than the screenshot implied, but still relevant: new quote-asset pairs can be structurally fragile, and promotions that rapidly concentrate flow into a single stablecoin can leave unusually thin order books in their wake. In that kind of market, a single market order can create a headline before it creates a trend.
At press time, Bitcoin traded at $89,298.
