Из жизни альткоинов

Бум мемкоинов пришелся на 2024 год. Однако шуточные монеты периодически все еще привлекают внимание. В начале 2026 года бурный рост продемонстрировал мемкоин Siren. Его необычная концепция пришлась по вкусу криптоинвесторам.

Flow Foundation is asking a Seoul court to halt the delisting of FLOW on South Korea’s biggest crypto exchanges.

FLOW Fights Back

In an announcement made on March 8, Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs (a venture‑backed Web3 company best known for creating CryptoKitties, NBA Top Shot and other major NFT products) have revealed that they filed a motion with the Seoul Central District Court to suspend the planned termination of FLOW trading on Upbit, Bithumb and Coinone.

Crypto Security Fears

On Dec. 27, Flow suffered a protocol‑level exploit that allowed an attacker to mint roughly 3.9 million duplicate tokens, triggering an emergency halt. Initial recovery proposals included a full chain rollback, which drew pushback from partners over double balances and bridge losses; the team pivoted to an “isolated recovery” that targeted and destroyed only the counterfeit tokens.

Despite no user funds on exchanges were ultimately lost, Korean platforms kept FLOW under heightened scrutiny. Upbit, Bithumb and Coinone announced on Feb. 12 that they would end trading support for FLOW on March 16, citing the December protocol-level exploit.

Security Concerns Are Now Resolved

However, every major global venue, including Binance, Coinbase, Kraken and HTX, have now independently reviewed the incident and fully restored FLOW trading, with Binance even removing its monitoring tag after a joint resolution on March 6. This confirms, according to Flow Foundation and Binance itself, that “all issues related to the security incident have been resolved”.

“A Commitment To Korea”

In Korea, Korbit (one of South Korea’s oldest regulated cryptocurrency exchanges, focused on KRW spot trading for major coins and retail users) conducted its own review, Korbit removed a trading-caution label on Feb. 27, and continues to support unrestricted FLOW trading. Flow Foundation expressed its special gratitude towards his Korean community continued support:

The Foundation recognizes the uncertainty the Korean community has faced since February, and is grateful for the patience and support of Korean holders through this process

The filing of the motion with the Seoul Central District Court is a step that “reflects the responsibility of the Foundation to advocate for the Korean community using every available pathway”, Flow Foundation claims. The Foundation has also assured that it “remains open to constructive conversation with all parties involved”.

Alongside this, The Foundation is pursuing new listings and expands self-custody options for local users while pushing ahead with its consumer DeFi roadmap, including on-chain automation, EVM‑equivalent infrastructure and an enshrined lending protocol, betting that long‑term adoption will outlast short‑term regulatory frictions in one market.

The Growth Of The Flow Ecosystem

While Korea wrestles over FLOW’s listing status, the underlying network is quietly behaving like a top‑tier consumer chain. Disney, the NBA, the NFL and Ticketmaster all continue to build on Flow, together distributing over 100 million NFTs to more than 13 million fans and generating billions in primary and secondary sales.

As Flow’s ecosystem momentum continues to build, the real question for investors watching the Korean injunction drama is whether a localized delisting can truly derail it.

Cover image from ChatGPT, FLOWUSD chart from Tradingview

Three deals last February ate up nearly half of all the money raised in crypto that month. Just three. That single fact tells you more about where crypto funding stands right now than the headline numbers do.

A Shrinking Pool Of Big Bets

According to data from research firm Messari, total crypto fundraising climbed almost 50% in the 12 months ending March 2026 compared to the year before.

But the number of individual deals fell 46% over the same period. Fewer rounds. Bigger checks. The average deal size hit $34 million — a 272% jump from a year earlier. The number of active investors dropped by about a third, down to 3,225.

Those three February standouts were Tether’s $200 million investment into online marketplace Whop, a $75 million Series B for sports prediction platform Novig led by Pantera Capital, and a $70 million Series B for ARQ, a Latin American fintech app built around stablecoins, backed by Sequoia Capital. Together, they accounted for 44% of the close to $800 million raised across the entire month.

It’s been an incredibly tough year for crypto fundraising. Most of the capital has flowed into larger strategic rounds

Outside of @dragonfly_xyz we haven’t seen many big VCs close new rounds (a16z and Paradigm active but not closed)

The industry needs some fresh capital pic.twitter.com/N8N58p6yvt

— Eric Turner (@eric_turner) March 8, 2026

Messari describes the pattern as capital concentration driven by late-stage and strategic mega-rounds. A handful of well-positioned companies are pulling in enormous sums while smaller players scramble for scraps.

Early-stage fundraising, reports say, remains active but scattered. Messari pointed to Interstate’s $1.5 million round, which pulled in more than 15 backers — a mix of firms like Bloccelerate VC and individual angel investors. That kind of fragmented, small-dollar activity is happening in volume. But it exists in a different world from the mega-rounds grabbing the headlines.

The VC Drought No One Is Talking About

Here is the part the headline buries. Messari CEO Eric Turner flagged a problem that goes beyond deal counts: outside of Dragonfly Capital, no major crypto venture firm has recently closed a new fund. Dragonfly closed a $650 million fund with a focus on real-world assets, but it stands largely alone. Turner put it bluntly — the industry needs fresh capital.

Crypto Investors Stay Active As New Funds Decline

That matters because venture funds have a shelf life. Firms raise a fund, deploy it over several years, then raise again. When new fund closes dry up, the money flowing into deals eventually does too.

The 50% year-over-year gain may look strong on paper, but it is being powered by existing pools that are not being replenished at the same rate.

Coinbase Ventures, QUBIC Labs, and Somnia ranked as the three most active crypto investors over the past three months, based on Messari data.

Featured image from KuCoin, chart from TradingView

Kraken parent Payward has partnered with Nasdaq to build what the companies describe as an “equities transformation gateway,” a new infrastructure layer designed to connect regulated tokenized equity markets with permissionless blockchain networks. For crypto markets, the significance is clear: one of the largest traditional market operators is now working directly with a crypto-native tokenization framework to move equities between institutional rails and DeFi environments.

The partnership centers on xStocks, Kraken’s tokenized equities product, which Payward said has surpassed $25 billion in total transaction volume less than a year after launch. More than $4 billion of that volume has been settled on-chain, and the framework now counts over 85,000 unique holders across supported networks, giving Kraken a sizable footprint as tokenized stocks move from concept toward market structure.

Nasdaq And Kraken Join Forces

Under the proposed setup, xStocks will power the permissionless infrastructure layer for Nasdaq’s upcoming issuer-sponsored equity token design. That design, which Nasdaq expects to become operational starting in the first half of 2027, is meant to preserve issuer control, existing regulatory frameworks, and the rights attached to the underlying shares while still allowing those assets to interact with blockchain-based financial systems.

In practical terms, the gateway is supposed to let eligible users swap tokenized equities between a regulated, permissioned market environment and open on-chain ecosystems. Payward said this would allow assets to move “fluidly” between institutional trading infrastructure and decentralized financial networks, while Payward Services handles KYC and AML onboarding for participants accessing the bridge through Kraken.

Arjun Sethi, co-CEO of Payward and Kraken, framed the effort as a structural change to how equities can be used once they are placed on programmable rails. “Tokenization upgrades market infrastructure at the asset layer by allowing equities to exist as programmable financial instruments that can operate across both regulated capital markets and open blockchain networks,” he said. “Today most equities sit inside brokerage systems where their utility is largely limited to directional exposure and, in some cases, broker-specific margin arrangements.”

He argued that the current model leaves capital trapped inside siloed venues. “That structure fragments liquidity across venues and leaves a meaningful amount of capital static relative to its potential utility,” Sethi said. “With xStocks, our goal is to make equities natively interoperable across trading venues, financial applications and blockchain networks while preserving issuer rights, regulatory protections and price integrity.”

Sethi went further, tying tokenized equities to a broader capital-efficiency thesis that will be familiar to crypto derivatives traders. “Bringing equities onto programmable infrastructure expands how they can function within a portfolio,” he said. “Instead of simply representing exposure to a company, tokenized equities can operate as collateral within unified trading systems that support spot markets, cross-margin trading, derivatives, perpetual futures, and financing environments.”

That point sits at the heart of the announcement. Payward is not pitching tokenized stocks merely as wrappers for traditional shares, but as collateral that can move across trading, lending and hedging systems under a unified margin framework. In jurisdictions where xStocks are already available, Payward will also serve for an initial period as the primary settlement layer for transactions tied to Nasdaq’s equity token design.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.32 trillion.

Bitcoin continues to struggle to reclaim the $70,000 level as volatility persists across the cryptocurrency market. After several attempts to recover from recent declines, price action remains fragile, reflecting a market environment where investors are still adjusting to shifting macro conditions and weakening momentum. As Bitcoin trades near the mid-$60,000 range, on-chain indicators suggest that selling pressure from short-term participants remains a key factor influencing the market structure.

According to analysis shared by on-chain analyst Axel Adler, recent data shows that short-term holders are continuing to realize losses at a sustained pace. The Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Spent Output Profit Ratio (STH SOPR) has remained below the neutral threshold of 1.0 for seven out of the last eight days. This metric compares the selling price of recently moved coins to their original purchase price, meaning readings below 1.0 indicate that investors are selling at a loss.

Between March 2 and March 9, STH SOPR crossed above 1.0 only once, briefly on March 4 when Bitcoin touched around $70,800. For the rest of the period, the indicator remained in loss-selling territory, with the weekly low recorded at 0.979 on March 6. As of March 9, the intraday average stands near 0.987, confirming persistent selling pressure among recent market entrants.

Short-Term Holder Supply Continues To Contract

The report also highlights important developments in the behavior of Bitcoin’s short-term holders, particularly through changes in the Short-Term Holder (STH) Supply metric. This indicator measures the total amount of BTC held by investors whose coins are younger than 155 days, offering insight into the activity of more reactive market participants.

Over the past two weeks, STH Supply has declined noticeably, falling from approximately 6.06 million BTC to around 5.92 million BTC. This represents a reduction of roughly 140,000 BTC within the cohort, signaling that a significant number of coins have either been sold or transitioned into longer holding periods. At the same time, the realized price of this group remains near $89,028, while Bitcoin’s market price is trading closer to $67,175.

This roughly 24% gap highlights the magnitude of unrealized losses currently affecting short-term holders. Such conditions often create psychological pressure, as investors who entered the market at higher prices face extended periods of negative returns.

The decline in STH Supply can reflect two parallel processes. In some cases, it represents capitulation as investors sell at a loss. In others, it reflects the natural maturation of coins into long-term holding categories. However, the large difference between realized price and market price suggests a potential supply overhang, as some holders may sell during future rallies to exit positions without losses.

Bitcoin Holds $67K After Sharp Correction From Cycle Highs

The 3-day chart shows Bitcoin trading near the $67,800 region after a sharp correction from the late-2025 highs above $120,000. The market structure shifted decisively at the start of 2026 when BTC lost momentum near the $110,000–$115,000 range and began forming a series of lower highs. This transition signaled a weakening trend and triggered an accelerated decline once price broke below the 50-period moving average (blue).

Selling pressure intensified during the first quarter of 2026, pushing Bitcoin quickly through the 100-period moving average (green). The breakdown confirmed a broader shift toward a corrective phase and eventually drove BTC toward the $62,000–$65,000 support area before buyers stepped in to stabilize price action.

Currently, Bitcoin is attempting to consolidate between $65,000 and $70,000, a range that now represents a critical short-term equilibrium zone. The 200-period moving average (red), positioned around the $88,000 region, remains far above the current price and acts as a major resistance level that bulls would need to reclaim to restore stronger long-term momentum.

Volume activity increased during the recent decline, suggesting that the correction involved significant distribution. For Bitcoin to reestablish a bullish structure, price would likely need to recover the $70,000–$75,000 range and reclaim the shorter moving averages.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

Data shows the Bitcoin price decline has left the majority of treasury companies in a state of loss, with 65% sitting more than 20% below cost basis.

Over 77% Of Bitcoin Treasury Firms Are Underwater On Their Buys

As pointed out by Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards in a new post on X, a high amount of Bitcoin treasury companies are sitting on losses at the moment. Treasury companies refer to firms that keep BTC on their balance sheet as a reserve asset. Companies of this type that are publicly traded do so to allow their investors indirect exposure to the digital asset via their stock.

The approach was popularized by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (previously MicroStrategy), which has amassed a humongous Bitcoin stack after its consistent accumulation over the years. During the past few months, BTC has observed a bearish shift, so these firms have naturally been impacted. Below is the chart shared by Edwards that shows the trend in the percentage of such companies that are underwater on their BTC buys.

As is visible in the graph, the total percentage of Bitcoin treasury firms in loss has gone up recently, with its value today sitting at 77.4%. Thus, it would appear that a strong majority of the companies have their holdings below their cost basis. This includes Strategy, which has an average acquisition level of $75,985, more than 12% above the current spot price.

A large percentage of the firms are in even worse losses than Strategy. In the same chart, data for the treasuries with holdings sitting more than 20% below their cost basis is also displayed. It would appear that this metric has a value of 65.6%, implying that less than 12% of the underwater companies are in losses smaller than 20%.

From the graph, it’s also apparent that the recent trend in the treasury firms resembles that of May 2022, when the bear market of that year was in full swing. Back then, the percentage figure eventually went on to touch even higher highs.

Like how public treasury companies provide for an indirect route into Bitcoin, there is also another such indirect means in the market available today: the spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs). These funds buy and hold the asset on behalf of their users, allowing them to get exposure to BTC’s price movements without having to deal with blockchain elements.

The bearish market shift also caused the US spot ETFs to face net outflows, as data from SoSoValue shows. During the last couple of weeks, however, inflows have poured into these funds, implying that demand for Bitcoin may be starting to return.

BTC Price

Bitcoin has retraced its recovery during the past few days as its price is back at the $67,600 mark.

Shiba Inu (SHIB) whale activity has intensified as major token holders shift their assets away from centralized exchanges (CEXs). Exchange reserves have plummeted to record lows, while the SHIB burn rate has accelerated dramatically, suggesting these investors may be preparing for significant market movements. These developments raise the question of whether the whales are positioning ahead of a potential market rebound or simply taking advantage of price declines to accumulate. 

Shiba Inu Whales Execute Massive Exchange Withdrawals

Shiba Inu has experienced a dramatic shift in whale behavior, as billions of SHIB tokens have recently moved away from crypto exchanges. This shift comes at a time when the broader cryptocurrency and meme coin market faces major headwinds, with Shiba Inu continuing to trade without clear directional momentum even as its price weakens. 

On March 8, on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant detected a sharp decline in exchange net flow, with a total outflow of 166.16 billion SHIB tokens across major exchanges, nearly double the previous day’s 88 billion tokens. Even earlier, on March 6, exchanges recorded a negative net flow of 170.53 billion tokens, indicating sustained large-scale withdrawals by whales.

Reports from WhaleScan on X have revealed that these whales have been active for a while now,  securing their positions ahead of any major market movement. Usually, when whales move tokens from exchanges, it means those tokens are being removed from circulation. This reduces the supply of tokens available for trading on markets, which can create upward price pressure if demand continues to rise. 

The recent whale movement also signals conviction in Shiba Inu despite its weakened fundamentals and recent sideways trading. Notably, WhaleScan has reported that due to the massive token exodus from exchanges, reserves on these crypto platforms have hit a record low of 80.9 trillion SHIB. This suggests that while weak hands are watching short-term price action, whales are accumulating, contributing to the decreasing supply. 

SHIB Deflationary Pressures Build As Burn Rate Spikes

In addition to declining reserves, Shiba Inu’s burn rate has accelerated dramatically, increasing by 27.4% just last week. Most notably, on March 6, the burn rate skyrocketed by over 53,950% in just 24 hours, reflecting a staggering increase in tokens being removed from circulation.

Combined with the billions of tokens that recently flowed out of exchanges, Whale Scan has noted that Shiba Inu’s supply crunch is becoming increasingly clear and difficult to ignore. Recent burn statistics paint the picture of token holders seeking deflation amid weakening price action.

Approximately 337 billion SHIB tokens were burned on March 3, last week, as the Shibarium ecosystem prepared for the anticipated FHE privacy upgrade for Q2 2026. These developments indicate that Shiba Inu’s deflationary pressure is building as supply continues to decrease on exchanges. 

Ripple, a crypto payments company has found itself at the center of fresh speculation once again after a large XRP transfer surfaced on-chain, catching the attention of market watchers and community members. The scale of the transfer and the fact that it was made outside Ripple’s established monthly escrow schedule have prompted questions across the crypto space, with analysts flagging the movement as “suspicious.” 

Ripple’s $260 Million XRP Transfer Raises Suspicions

A significant transfer by Ripple drew the attention of crypto analysts and market watchers last week after blockchain records from XRPScan captured the movement of 200 million XRP from a wallet owned by the crypto company. The transaction, valued at $280 million at the time, took place on Thursday, March 5, days after Ripple’s scheduled monthly escrow release. 

Notably, screenshots of the transaction began circulating on X, with many speculating about its nature and the possible reasons behind it. One market analyst, Xaif Crypto, was among the first to flag the movement publicly. 

Xaif Crypto shared a screenshot showing that $280.8 million was transferred in a single transaction, with validators confirming the transfer in the XRP Ledger (XRPL) under ledger number “102673499.” The analyst noted that the movement was worth watching, warning that the timing of the transfer felt too suspicious to dismiss without explanation.

He raised several possibilities for the transfer, questioning whether the transaction was for settlement purposes, a partnership, or another of Ripple’s many acquisitions. The analyst offered no concrete evidence for any of the scenarios he assumed; however, his post sparked significant debate within the XRP community. 

Community Debates Ripple’s Massive Transfer

Several members of the crypto community speculated that Ripple might be planning to sell the massive $280.8 million XRP transferred last week. If that were the case, it could have a significant impact on XRP’s already weakened price, particularly because Ripple remains the largest holder of the token. 

However, there is currently no evidence to support the claims that a sell-off may be imminent. Moreover, this is not the first time Ripple has been accused of possibly selling its holdings, especially during periods of broader market weakness and volatility. 

Other community members examined the transaction more closely, questioning the identity behind the designation tag that received the large transfer. However, on-chain data from XRPScan clarified that the funds were moved from a wallet identified as Ripple 1 to another labeled as Ripple 50, both of which are controlled by the company. 

This confirmed that no external party had received the XRP and the transfer was purely internal, with no actual outflow from Ripple’s holdings. As a result, some community members have reasoned that the quiet transfer was most likely related to internal supply rebalancing or an over-the-counter (OTC) settlement.