源聚合

Quick Facts:

• Bitcoin is consolidating under $70k; technicals suggest a breakout toward $85k-$100k if resistance at $72.5k clears.
• The primary downside risk is losing the $60k support, which could trigger a liquidation cascade toward $52k.
• Bitcoin Hyper uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-speed smart contracts to Bitcoin, raising over $31M in early capital.
• On-chain metrics show accumulation, but low volume on current rallies warrants caution regarding potential fake-outs.

Bitcoin is currently engaged in a tense standoff with the psychological $70,000 barrier, a ceiling that has held firm for weeks.

The market is witnessing a classic consolidation pattern: volatility compressing, leverage flushing, and price trading in a tight range. Historically, this quiet precedes a violent move. While retail traders grow impatient with the chop, on-chain data tells a different story beneath the surface.

The main culprit for this hesitation? A messy mix of macroeconomic ambiguity and short-term profit-taking. Yet, the macro thesis remains solid. With institutional ETF flows providing a soft floor and global liquidity cycles turning, the math favors a breakout. The question isn’t if Bitcoin breaks higher, but when the post-halving supply shock finally dries up the available liquidity on exchanges.

This compression phase forces capital to make a choice. While Bitcoin prepares for its next leg up, risk-tolerant capital is already rotating. Traders looking to maximize the coming cycle are hedging spot holdings with high-beta infrastructure plays.

That rotation suggests that while Bitcoin targets a conservative 2x, emerging protocols like Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) are capturing attention (and liquidity) for their potential to fix Bitcoin’s scaling issues before the bull market truly heats up.

Learn more about $HYPER here.

Technical Outlook: The Path to $100K Requires a Clean Break

Despite the immediate resistance at $70,000, Bitcoin’s high-timeframe structure remains aggressively bullish.

Analysts are eyeing the convergence of the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a setup that historically signals trend continuation rather than reversal. Plus, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has reset from overbought territory. That gives the asset room to run without overheating.

For the bulls to win, Bitcoin needs to reclaim the $72,500 level with real volume. A daily close above that zone would invalidate the bearish divergence and open a path toward price discovery.

Most technical models project that once $74,000 clears, the psychological vacuum pulls price rapidly toward the $85,000–$90,000 range. Consensus suggests a breakout here puts the $100,000 milestone in play by late Q3, fueled by corporate treasury adoption and ETF rebalancing.

However, risks remain. If the $60,000 support fails during a macro shakeout, the structure weakens significantly.

• Bull Case: A high-volume breach of $72,000 targets $88,000 in the medium term.
• Base Case: Another 2-3 weeks of chop between $64,000 and $71,000.
• Invalidation: A weekly close below $58,500 signals a deeper correction is needed to find liquidity.

Watch spot volume on Coinbase closely. If price pushes up while volume drops? It’s likely a fake-out.

Smart Money Rotates to Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) for L2 Utility

As Bitcoin battles resistance, sophisticated investors are looking at the rails that will power the network’s future. The focus is shifting toward Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the first Bitcoin Layer 2 integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).

While Bitcoin serves as pristine collateral, digital gold, it’s frankly too slow and expensive for DeFi. Bitcoin Hyper solves this by anchoring to Bitcoin for security while using SVM for high-speed execution.

The market’s appetite is clear. According to the official presale page, Bitcoin Hyper has raised $31.3M, with tokens currently priced at $0.0136754. That capital inflow suggests strong conviction in the ‘Bitcoin DeFi’ narrative.

By allowing developers to write in Rust and deploy dApps that settle on Bitcoin, the project bridges the gap between Bitcoin’s $1.3 trillion liquidity and modern functionality.

Whale activity backs this up. Etherscan records show that 3 whale wallets alone have accumulated $1M. The largest transaction, a $500K buy, occurred on Jan 15, 2026. (Note: Large-scale buy orders during a presale usually indicate institutional due diligence is finished).

Still, caution is necessary. Layer 2 protocols are high-risk environments subject to execution hurdles. While the promise of high APY staking and a Decentralized Canonical Bridge is appealing, $HYPER remains a beta play on the ecosystem’s expansion.

Buy $HYPER here.

This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile assets. The content provided is for informational purposes only. Your should conduct your own independent research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.

BitMine Immersion Technologies, возглавляемая сооснователем Fundstrat Global Advisors Томом Ли (Tom Lee), докупила 40 613 ETH на $83,2 млн, несмотря на нереализованные убытки в $7,5 млрд.

В Татарстане зафиксирован очередной случай мошенничества с криптовалютами. 37-летняя жительница Нижнекамска потеряла 3,6 млн рублей, вложив средства в фиктивный криптопроект.

A long‑running dispute between the US banking sector and the crypto industry is widening, with tensions now extending beyond stablecoin yields to a new regulatory flashpoint: “skinny” Federal Reserve (Fed) master accounts. 

According to a report published Monday by Crypto In America, the disagreement is emerging as another obstacle in an already strained relationship between traditional finance and digital asset firms.

Crypto‑Bank Tensions Grow

The issue comes as lawmakers continue to struggle with the passage of the anticipated crypto market structure legislation known as the CLARITY Act, which has been delayed in part by unresolved questions around whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer yield on stablecoins. 

Now, attention is shifting to the Federal Reserve’s proposal to introduce “skinny” master accounts, a limited form of Fed access that would allow eligible fintech and crypto firms to connect directly to the central bank’s payment infrastructure without receiving full banking privileges.

Eleanor Terret, the journalist closely tracking the bill’s progress in Washington, reported that banks and crypto advocates are sharply divided over the proposal. 

Terret noted that the disagreement became clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve last Friday by a broad range of stakeholders, including crypto companies, industry groups, banking trade associations and individual commentators.

Circle (CRCL) argued that granting limited Fed access would strengthen the overall payments system by increasing its resilience. The Blockchain Payments Consortium said skinny master accounts could help remove uncompetitive practices that disadvantage consumers and concentrate risk within a small number of large banks. 

However, not all crypto firms expressed full approval. Anchorage Digital described the proposal as a step in the right direction but criticized its limitations. 

The company noted that the accounts would not provide direct access to the Federal Reserve’s automated clearing house, nor would they allow firms to hold balances or earn interest on reserves—features Anchorage believes are necessary for meaningful participation in the payment system.

Fraud And Oversight Concerns 

Banks, by contrast, raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many of the entities likely to qualify for skinny accounts lack a long‑term supervisory history and are not governed by consistent federal safety and soundness standards. 

The group also pointed out that many crypto firms operate under regulatory frameworks that are still evolving. The Colorado Bankers Association echoed those worries, cautioning that expanded access could create opportunities for faster‑moving fraud.

The Federal Reserve has said it will review all submitted comments before drafting formal rules for skinny master accounts. Fed Governor Christopher Waller told Crypto In America that he hopes the central bank will be able to release a proposal for those rules in the fourth quarter of this year.

The debate is unfolding just ahead of a scheduled meeting at the White House on Tuesday, where officials are expected to bring together representatives from both the crypto and banking sectors in an attempt to ease tensions, particularly around the issue of stablecoin yield. 

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

South Korean regulators have announced an inspection of local crypto exchanges and improved measures to address regulatory “blind spots” following Bithumb’s $40 billion Bitcoin (BTC) payment error.

New Task Force To Review Crypto Exchanges’ Practices

On Monday, South Korean financial authorities announced they will step up their efforts to regulate the crypto industry and foster a trustworthy trading environment for digital assets, local news outlets reported.

Following the “ghost Bitcoin” incident at Bithumb, South Korea’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange, the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)’s Governor Lee Chan-jin revealed an inspection of local exchanges and emphasized the need for improved legislation.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Bithumb accidentally distributed 620,000 Bitcoin, worth over $40 billion, to 249 users participating in the exchange’s “random box” promotional event due to an employee’s mistake.

Although 99% of the BTC were recovered, the incident raised serious concerns about the crypto exchange’s internal controls. Notably, Bithumb held 175 BTC in its own books, and less than 50,000 Bitcoin between its own assets and customer-held assets, according to a regulatory filing from last year.

This means that the exchange’s system failed to block the irregular transaction, distributing assets that did not actually exist to users and distorting market prices.

“The so-called ghost Bitcoin incident clearly revealed that, beyond a mere input error, there are structural weaknesses in internal controls and ledger management systems of cryptocurrency exchanges,” said Kim Jiho, a spokesperson for the ruling Democratic Party, in a Saturday briefing.

Meanwhile, the FSS Governor affirmed that the “incident bluntly exposed the structural flaws in virtual asset trading systems,” adding, “There are many aspects of the case that we view as extremely serious.”

As a result, the FSS, alongside the Korean Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU), the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), formed an emergency task force to organize follow-up measures and review industrywide practices.

The reports noted that the task force plans to examine Bithumb and other domestic exchanges’ virtual asset reserves, management practices, operational conditions, and internal control systems.

“We will carry out planned investigations into major high-risk areas in the virtual asset market where unfair trading practices, such as market manipulation and the dissemination of false information, are a concern,” Lee stated.

Regulators To Address ‘Structural Vulnerabilities’

The FSS Governor also warned that the process could be escalated into a full investigation if any illegal activities are revealed, adding that the incident would be reflected in the long-awaited Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which is expected to serve as a comprehensive framework for the entire industry.

“While we are drawing up the second phase of virtual asset legislation, measures to address structural vulnerabilities at exchanges, exposed by the recent Bithumb incident, will be reflected,” Lee declared.

“As virtual assets are being incorporated into the legacy financial system, there remains the task of strengthening the regulatory and supervisory framework. This could serve as an opportunity to put the system in place properly,” he continued.

It’s worth noting that South Korean financial authorities are reportedly considering introducing a system to prevent suspects from hiding or withdrawing unrealized profits from market manipulation related to crypto assets.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed last month that it is exploring the proposal for prosecution measures against suspects of crypto asset price manipulation, as some officials consider that there’s a need “to complement the current Virtual Asset User Protection Act by implementing measures for the confiscation of criminal proceeds or the preservation of recovery funds in advance.”

The measure would limit fund outflows, such as withdrawals, transfers, and payments from a crypto-related account suspected of obtaining illicit gains through typical market manipulation tactics.