Сборщик RSS-лент

Генеральный директор финансовой компании Bitwise Хантер Хорсли (Hunter Horsley) заявил об изменении структуры крипторынка и призвал криптоинвесторов дождаться окончания медвежьего тренда.

Основатель и исполнительный председатель компании Strategy Майкл Сейлор (Michael Saylor) заявил, что давление продавцов снизилось, а криптовалюты ждет рост — на фоне ухода с рынка спекулятивных игроков.

Председатель Банка России Эльвина Набиуллина сообщила, что решение отсрочить начало обязательного использования цифрового рубля до сентября 2026 года было связано с необходимостью «проработки востребованных сервисов».

60-летняя пенсионерка из Калининграда потеряла почти 3 млн рублей, пытаясь заработать на криптовалюте, сообщило областное управление МВД России.

Автор книги о личных финансах «Богатый папа, бедный папа», предприниматель и инвестор Роберт Кийосаки (Robert Kiyosaki) объяснил падение цены биткоина дефицитом ликвидности на глобальных рынках.

Bitcoin is stepping into a new era where its movements can no longer be explained by crypto-native events. Instead, BTC has become increasingly intertwined with the global business cycle, reacting to shifts in institutional positioning. As the market matures, BTC behaves less like a speculative outlier and more like a macro-sensitive asset that rises and falls with the broader economic pulse.

Liquidity Cycles Drive Bitcoin More Than Crypto Narratives

The correlation between the business cycle and Bitcoin has never been clearer, and the latest chart has made the connection harder to ignore. According to a well-known crypto news analysis on X, CryptosRus, this chart overlays BTC price action with the broader macro business cycle, and the alignment is almost striking.

Currently, BTC appears to be approaching a cycle bottom that mirrors previous macro business-cycle lows. What makes this setup compelling is the record-long pre-parabolic phase in BTC history. If this pattern continues, the next major expansion phase may be closer than expected.

The market is entering a meaningful turning point. The Co-founders of Glassnode, Swissblock, and censeAG, Negentropic, stated that the Treasury General Account (TGA) drain began on November 14th, and historically, its liquidity flow leads Bitcoin by roughly one week. During the 2019 government shutdown, BTC found its bottom and began recovering within 12 days as liquidity started normalizing.

This recent stretch has been the most challenging phase of the liquidity squeeze, and its peak effect has hit this week. The government’s reopening of an estimated $150 billion in excess TGA liquidity is providing a meaningful tailwind as it enters the markets. With the economic data on pause during the government shutdown, the near-term repricing has been influenced by uncertainty.

Meanwhile, the Nvidia earnings next week will offer the next clear signal for risk. “The worst of the squeeze is likely behind us, and the setup is improving. Patience is key,” Negentropic noted.

Government Liquidity Injection Could Neutralize Recession Fears

Brian Rose, the founder and host of LondonRealTV, has also offered an insight into the current market setup, stating that the Federal Reserve has officially announced the end of quantitative tightening (QT). At the same time, the US government is reopening and unleashing more than $100 billion of pent-up liquidity directly back into the system. According to Brian, BTC sentiment is the worst he has seen in years. 

In the short term, there’s fear around recessionary jobs data, while in the mid-term, there are real catalysts for liquidity. However, as long as nothing is breaking, the market can handle bad data. This is a strange mix of despair and fresh money. Historically, the extreme pessimism combined with liquidity injections has been the exact setup where rallies begin.

Matthew Sigel, the head of digital assets research at VanEck, has ignited a storm within the XRP community with a single sarcastic remark on X social media. While brief, his statement seemed to dismiss years of development and innovation behind the XRP Ledger (XRPL), leaving many community members and industry analysts both shocked and aggrieved. Sigel’s words have sparked passionate debates about the value, utility, and understanding of XRP as a blockchain and digital asset.

Sigel Draws Criticism For Subtly Mocking XRP

Sigel’s controversial post appeared to be a subtle jab toward XRP enthusiasts, suggesting that he would never understand the XRPL blockchain but respected the passion and effort required to “pretend it does something.” Sigel’s mocking tone appeared to diminish the accomplishments of XRP over the years, provoking instant backlash from the cryptocurrency’s dedicated community. 

The VanEck executive implied that, despite the visible enthusiasm and hustle of supporters, the work behind XRP might ultimately be meaningless. His veiled critique about the blockchain and the community backing it struck a nerve, likely because XRP has been under development for over a decade, with consistent progress in regulatory navigation, DeFi applications, and cross-border payment solutions. 

Members of the XRP community who felt the post belittled the financial and technological innovations embedded in the blockchain’s ecosystem have voiced strong opinions that sharply contrast with Sigel’s statement. Some have even criticized the VanEck executive for his perceived lack of understanding and appreciation of the technology, particularly given his current role as head of digital asset research at the asset management company. 

XRP Community Pushes Back Against Sigel’s Statement 

In response to Sigel’s post on X, many prominent figures in the crypto space immediately challenged his mocking remarks. Panos Mekras, co-founder of Anodos Finance, highlighted the groundbreaking nature of the XRP Ledger, noting its ability to naturally deepen liquidity and act as a decentralized settlement layer without the risks associated with smart contracts or wallet exploits. 

Digital asset researcher Anders also criticized Sigel for publicly admitting a lack of understanding. At the same time, Ripple developer Matt Hamilton emphasized the professional responsibility of those in digital asset research to grasp the fundamentals of blockchain. 

Popular market analyst CryptoSensei mocked the irony of VanEck’s research lead dismissing XRP’s technological innovations, suggesting the asset management company might need to hire new blockchain experts. Community members joined the chorus, highlighting that XRP, like Bitcoin, serves as a cornerstone of value and liquidity, and that the collective effort of investors, developers, and enthusiasts lends it unique utility. 

Other members appeared to be educating Sigel on XRP’s longstanding role in global payments and settlement, stressing that minimal transaction volume does not equate to lack of value, drawing parallels to BTC’s historical pattern. Despite Sigel acknowledging that he would never make sense of the XRP blockchain, supporters remain resolute, using the controversy to enlighten and amplify the network’s achievements and ongoing developments. 

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

The sentiment around Bitcoin and the general crypto market appears to be worsening, with most large-cap assets on a decline in recent days. On Friday, September 14, the flagship cryptocurrency fell below the $95,000 mark for the first time in over six months.

Interestingly, the price of Bitcoin seems set for an even longer period of negative action, as a rare bearish signal has gone off for the first time in four years. Here’s how much the BTC price dropped the last time this happened.

BTC Price At Risk Of 70% Decline If Sell Signal Holds

In a recent post on the social media platform X, Chartered Market Technician Tony Severino shared an alarming outlook for the Bitcoin price in the long term. According to the crypto expert, the rare sell signal on the BTC weekly supertrend has gone off again.

The “weekly supertrend” is a technical indicator that uses the Average True Range (ATR) and a multiplier to pinpoint the direction of an asset’s price trend over a weekly timeframe. As observed in the chart below, the indicator turns green for an upward trend and red for a downward trend, offering potential buy and sell signals.

In his Friday post on X (formerly Twitter), Severino highlighted that Bitcoin just triggered a sell signal on the Supertrend indicator on the weekly timeframe. According to the prominent crypto pundit, this represents the first time this signal will be going off for the premier cryptocurrency since December 2021.

At the time, the sell signal marked the abrupt end of the previous Bitcoin bull cycle, preceding an extended period of downward price movement. The price of Bitcoin fell by more than 70% after this signal was triggered, coinciding with significant sell-offs following the Terra LUNA and FTX collapses in 2022.

If history is anything to go by, this sell signal foretells a story of a potential 60 – 70% decline for the Bitcoin price. A downturn of that magnitude could see the market leader return to around $30,000 from the current price point.

However, it is worth noting that the weekly supertrend sell signal is currently still unconfirmed. While the indicator has been in a buy signal since January 2023, a weekly price close below $96,300 could spell the start of a bear market for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Price At A Glance

As of this writing, the price of BTC sits just above $94,400, representing an over 6% decline in the past 24 hours.

Bearish sentiments continue to dominate the Bitcoin market as the leading cryptocurrency registered a decisive price break below the $100,000 psychological support zone. Following this highly volatile display, blockchain analytics firm Glassnode has noted the reaction of the BTC options market.

Bitcoin Traders Expect More Correction Ahead

The BTC options market allows traders to gain the right to buy or sell Bitcoin at a specific price or on or before a certain date. Options let traders hedge against risk, and bet on volatility, among other features, and thus are a good gauge of traders’ sentiment.

Notably, Bitcoin’s retest and fall below the $100,000 price mark were anticipated by the options market, which had been accumulating put options (BTC sell bets) as protection against bearish risk. Following this event, Glassnode notes that traders have reacted by now adjusting their positions based on higher uncertainty and fear of more downside.

In assessing several metrics that guide the options market, Glassnode notes that the ATM implied volatility is rising as the short-term market uncertainty trickles in. The 1-week IV now stands at 51% while the 6-month IV is 48% indicating that traders expect the next few days/weeks to be unstable. 

Meanwhile, the 25-delta skew, which compares demand for puts vs calls (upside bets), is strongly bearish as the 1-week and 1-month skew range around 12.4% and 10% respectively. For context, a positive skew means puts are more expensive due to high demand as traders are scared of more price drops.

The traders’ fear of further downside is also reinforced by data from the taker flow, which shows that recent flows over the past 24 hours have been dominated by put buys (38.8%). However, it’s worth noting that when dealers sell these puts, they hedge their risk by also selling BTC futures. As the spot price drops, the hedging continues, eventually creating a feedback loop that increases volatility and speeds up price decline.

Market Turns Focus On $95,000 Puts 

According to Glassnode, the price break below  $100,000 shifted option traders’ focus on the $95,000 puts, which have been heavily bid. However, while BTC still trades above this strike, the persistent demand signals expectations of further downside, as traders continue to accumulate protection against deeper losses.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin trades at $96,311 on the daily chart, reflecting a 3.86% loss in the past 24 hours. Meanwhile, trading volume is down by 12.46% and valued at $99.92 billion. 

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, the leading Ethereum treasury company, has appointed a new CEO and new board members. This move comes as the firm, which initially launched as a crypto mining company, looks to overhaul its leadership.

Chi Tsang As CEO And Board Member

In a press release on Friday, November 14, Bitmine announced Chi Tsang as the company’s new chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors, effective immediately. Tsang, founder of venture firm m1720, will be replacing Jonathan Bates, who has been CEO since 2022.

The Ethereum treasury firm also disclosed the appointment of three new independent board members, including Robert Sechan, Olivia Howe, and Jason Edgeworth. Tsang said that Bitmine is positioned to become a leading institution, thanks to its significant Ethereum holdings and strong bridge between traditional finance and cryptocurrency.

Tsang, the new Bitmine CEO, said in a statement:

The transformation and innovation now facing Wall Street through blockchain and Ethereum mirror the explosion of opportunity that mobile phones and the internet unleashed on telecoms and technology in the 1990s.

The appointment of vocal Ethereum investor Tom Lee as the chairman of Bitmine’s board of directors saw its strategic transition from a crypto mining firm to a digital asset treasury. Since then, BitMine has become the largest corporate Ether holder and the largest Ethereum company.

Tom Lee, Bitmine’s board chairman, said:

Our new CEO and Board members bring a unique blend of experience, insight, and leadership across technology, DeFi and financial services, enabling BitMine to further position itself as the bridge between traditional capital markets and the supercycle Ethereum ecosystem.

Bitmine has continued to expand its Ether treasury, reporting a holding of more than 3.5 million tokens (worth more than $11 billion at the current price) as of Monday, November 10. While the firm currently holds 3% of the total Ether supply, the firm plans to capture 5% of Ethereum’s free-floating tokens.

BitMine Share Price Drops 36% In Past Month

The price of BitMine’s stock (with the ticker BMNR) stood at around $34.4 by market close on Friday, reflecting an almost 6% decline in the past day.  Meanwhile, the BMNR stock has decreased in value by more than 36% in the past month.

This disappointing performance comes on the back of waning sentiment around digital asset treasuries in recent months. A report in October found that retail investors have lost up to $17 billion to the Bitcoin treasury hype.

The ex-CFO of a private software company has been declared guilty of wire fraud after using the company’s cash to fund a cryptocurrency side business.

Crypto Side Hustle Gone Wrong

In a recent press release, the US Attorney’s Office, Western District of Washington, announced the conviction of Nevin Shetty, who misappropriated $35 million belonging to his former employer. The 41-year-old man from Mercer Island, Washington, resumed as the CFO of an unnamed private software company in March 2021, a time during which the firm was actively fundraising.

The company established an investment policy that stated that this newly raised cash should only be invested in money market accounts and other low-risk markets, while the company continued to focus on improving current business operations. 

Despite his heavy involvement in this policy decision, Nevin Shetty moved $35 million of the company’s cash into HighTower Treasury, a cryptocurrency investment platform founded by him and another partner in February 2022. The DOJ notes this embezzlement occurred after the company raised concerns about Shetty’s performance, hinting at possible severance.

The statement read:

In March 2022, he (Shetty) was told he could not continue as CFO at his employer due to concerns about his performance. Shortly after he got this news, Shetty secretly transferred the funds out of the company’s account. Between April 1 and 12, 2022, Shetty transferred $35,000,100 of his employer’s money to an account for HighTower Treasury. No other executives or board members at the company knew of these transfers.

The now-convicted criminal apparently placed these funds in a high-yield DeFi lending protocol that had promised 20% interest, with the intention of remitting 6% to the company and HighTower Treasury retained the other 14% profit. While the idea got off to a good start, generating $133,000 in the first month, the investments began hemorrhaging in the following month, eventually reaching $0 on May 13, 2022.

Shetty was subsequently fired after he informed colleagues of this escapade. The company also reported the situation to the FBI, prompting a full-scale investigation.

Shetty Awaits Sentencing

According to the DOJ, Shetty was convicted of four counts of wire fraud on November 7, 2025, following a 10-hour jury deliberation to close a nine-day jury trial. The US District Judge Tana Lin has now scheduled sentencing for the ex-CFO for February 11, 2026, to debate the consequences of such financial misappropriation.

While each wire fraud count carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years, that does not necessarily mean he could face 80 years. Federal sentences are not always run consecutively, and the judge will follow the US Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account factors such as loss amount, role in the fraud, and his criminal history (if any).

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has brought to light a new digital asset fraud scheme, culminating in the sentencing of a crypto CEO to almost five years in prison. 

Travis Ford, the CEO, co-founder, and head trader of Wolf Capital Crypto Trading, was found guilty of orchestrating a crypto investment fraud conspiracy. Ford, hailing from Glenpool, Oklahoma, is said to have played a crucial role in raising $9.4 million from around 2,800 investors through false promises of high returns.

Promising Unrealistic Returns

According to the Department of Justice, Ford’s fraudulent activities spanned from January 2023 to August 2023, during which he misrepresented himself as a skilled trader capable of delivering exceptional daily returns ranging from 1% to 2% (equating to approximately 547% annually). 

Despite his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, Ford confessed that achieving such consistent returns was implausible. 

Instead, the crypto executive and his accomplices utilized what the DOJ described as deceptive tactics to lure unsuspecting investors, misappropriating and diverting their funds for personal gain.

Simultaneously, there has been a surge in global efforts towards regulating digital assets, spearheaded by President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto stance. 

Governments worldwide, including the US and China, are intensifying crackdowns on cryptocurrency-related cross-border crimes as a result, particularly targeting scam networks operating in Southeast Asia.

Crypto Fraud Hotspots

Local media reports indicate that regions bordering Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia have transformed into hotspots for online fraud operations. 

Syndicates operating in these areas reportedly employ various tactics to coerce victims into investing in fraudulent schemes, often involving the transfer of funds through digital assets like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), or stablecoins, followed by intricate money-laundering processes.

Despite the increasing mainstream adoption of digital assets in financial sectors, the report indicated that cryptocurrencies continue to play a significant role in sophisticated criminal enterprises. 

However, recent actions, such as the seizure of $13.4 billion worth of Bitcoin from Chen Zhi, a Cambodian tycoon with Chinese origins, underscore the global efforts to combat crypto-related crimes.

Additionally, the US DOJ’s establishment of a Scam Center Strike Force signifies a pivotal initiative aimed at combating crypto investment fraud targeting Americans. 

This move marks a significant step in the US government’s vision to confront transnational criminal networks head-on, as highlighted in a report by blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs. 

The DOJ revealed that Southeast Asian scam syndicates defraud Americans of nearly $10 billion each year. This emphasizes the urgency of addressing such criminal activities, especially given the progressive US legislation promoting the growth and adoption of digital assets.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Crypto pundit Vincent Van Code has explained why companies shouldn’t custody their XRP holdings amid the rise in treasury companies. As part of his comments, he advocated that these companies gain the token exposure to ETFs and other regulated wrappers rather than holding the coins. 

Pundit Explains Why Companies Should Avoid XRP Custody

In an X post, Vincent Van Code stated that companies accidentally turn themselves into a bank, security firm, and a regulated financial institution overnight, the moment they decide to self-custody their XRP. He further remarked that the bill for this mistake is “massive,” as it has some repercussions. 

The crypto pundit noted that most companies think that holding their own crypto tokens is the same as holding cash in a bank account. However, he explained that they are not the same as custodying XRP is one of the “most complex, expensive, compliance-heavy things” an organization can do. Vincent Van Code then used the altcoin as a case study. 

He stated that to self-custody at a large scale, companies are not just storing a seed phrase but are now operating a regulated asset environment. The crypto pundit explained that this exposes these companies to annual audits, SOC2 controls, and cold storage infrastructure. They would also have to worry about key ceremony documentation, segregation of duties, insider threat mitigation, and round-the-clock monitoring. 

Other Implications Of Custody

Vincent Van Code further mentioned that companies looking to self-custody their XRP will need incident response teams, a compliance officer, a risk team, internal policies, board oversight, and a full suite of legal and operational safeguards that they must continually maintain. He further highlighted the cost implications of implementing such safeguards. 

The crypto pundit revealed that the annual cost for a proper crypto custody program could easily hit seven figures. He noted that external audits alone cost between $250,000 and $500,000 annually, once these companies factor in SOC2 Type II, penetration testing, cyber insurance, regulatory reporting, and chain-of-custody reviews. 

Vincent Van Code also factored in staff that these companies will need to run the self-custody of their XRP assets. Meanwhile, these companies have to bear the risk and liability when something breaks, or a regulator asks questions, or the auditor finds a gap in the accounts. 

The Best Way For Institutional Adoption

Vincent Van Code stated that the real path to large-scale, multi-billion-dollar XRP adoption is not through thousands of companies holding the token. Instead, he claimed that it is through regulated wrappers, such as spot XRP ETFs and institutional treasury firms such as Ripple-backed Evernorth. 

He explained that these vehicles absorb the compliance load, audit burden, operational risk, and infrastructure costs. Vincent Van Code further remarked that they allow companies to hold XRP exposure without becoming a bank. The crypto pundit added that if mainstream enterprises are going to adopt the token globally, it will be through these structures and not DIY custody operations that could collapse under their complexity.

Securitize and Binance have jointly announced on Friday that the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) will now be accepted as off-exchange collateral for trading on Binance. 

BlackRock’s BUIDL Gains Momentum

Fortune reported that the collaboration with Binance is expected to boost the popularity of BUIDL, a token launched by the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, last year. Since its inception, BUIDL has witnessed significant growth, with its market capitalization exceeding $2.5 billion. 

Functioning akin to a stablecoin, BUIDL is commonly utilized as collateral for trading cryptocurrency derivatives, catering primarily to large institutional investors like private equity firms and hedge funds that make a minimum investment of $5 million into the BlackRock BUIDL fund. 

What sets BUIDL apart from traditional stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) is its unique feature of distributing the yield collected from its reserves to investors. 

Currently offering a yield of around 4%, BlackRock imposes a management fee ranging from 0.2% to 0.5% on the token. To bring BUIDL into existence, BlackRock collaborates with Securitize, a company specializing in issuing digital assets. 

Securitize’s CEO, Carlos Domingo, highlighted the growing popularity of tokenized assets due to their ability to facilitate quick and efficient trade settlements. 

Domingo emphasized the “antiquated nature” of current capital market ledgers, often built on outdated software, contrasting this with the “agile and near-instant settlement capabilities” of blockchain technology. 

Binance Responds To Demand

Catherine Chen, Binance’s Head of VIP & Institutional, noted that the addition of BUIDL was driven partly by customer demand. She noted in the statement: 

Integrating BUIDL with our banking triparty partners and our crypto-native custody partner, Ceffu, meets their needs and enables our clients to confidently scale allocation while meeting compliance requirements.

Concurrently, BUIDL is set to introduce a new share class on the BNB Chain network, enhancing investor reach and interoperability with other blockchain financial applications.

Launched in March 2024, BUIDL marked BlackRock’s inaugural tokenized fund on a public blockchain, tokenized by Securitize, offering qualified investors access to U.S. dollar yields with flexible custody, daily dividend payouts, and seamless peer-to-peer transfers.

This integration builds upon BUIDL’s presence across networks like Arbitrum (ARB), Aptos (APT), Avalanche (AVAX), Ethereum (ETH), Optimism (OP), Polygon (POL), and Solana (SOL), further enhancing its accessibility and utility within the blockchain ecosystem.

When writing, Binance’s native token, BNB, trades at $931.60, recording losses exceeding 20% in the past 30 days. This positions Binance Coin 32% below all-time high levels of $1,369 reached back in October of this year. 

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Bitcoin has dropped below the $100,000 mark for the first time since May, igniting renewed anxiety across the crypto market. The flagship cryptocurrency is currently trading near $97,000, with traders and investors facing growing uncertainty amid persistent selling pressure and waning momentum. Fear levels have surged as many market participants begin to question whether this breakdown marks the start of a new bear market phase or simply a deeper correction within the ongoing cycle.

Some analysts warn that the recent loss of key psychological support could trigger further downside if buyers fail to defend lower levels. Historical patterns show that once BTC breaks below major round numbers, volatility tends to accelerate before finding a stable base.

However, others remain cautiously optimistic. Ki Young Ju, CEO of CryptoQuant, noted that it is still too early to confirm a full-scale bear market. He argues that on-chain data — including exchange flows, miner behavior, and long-term holder activity — does not yet reflect the kind of structural weakness typically seen during cycle tops. Instead, he suggests that the market may be entering a prolonged consolidation phase, where volatility cools before Bitcoin prepares for its next directional move.

$94K Becomes the Line in the Sand for Bitcoin’s Bull Case

According to Ki Young Ju, CEO of CryptoQuant, the key level that could determine Bitcoin’s next major trend lies around $94,000. On-chain data shows that investors who entered the market between six to twelve months ago have an average cost basis near this level, meaning it represents a crucial psychological and structural support zone.

Ju explains that while Bitcoin’s drop below $100,000 has triggered widespread concern, the market hasn’t yet confirmed a full-blown bear cycle. He notes that price action would need to sustain a breakdown below $94,000 before signaling a significant shift in sentiment and long-term trend structure. “Personally, I do not think the bear cycle is confirmed unless we lose that level,” Ju said, emphasizing the importance of patience amid heightened volatility.

He adds that overreacting to short-term fluctuations often leads to poor decision-making during periods of market stress. For now, the best course of action may be to wait rather than jump to conclusions. If $94,000 holds as support, it could serve as the foundation for a potential recovery. Conversely, a decisive breakdown below that threshold would mark a clear warning sign that the bull phase has likely ended.

Bitcoin Drops Below $100K, Testing Long-Term Support Levels

Bitcoin’s weekly chart paints a concerning picture as the cryptocurrency trades around $96,900, marking its first sustained move below the $100,000 level since May. The breakdown represents a 7.4% decline over the last week, with selling volume increasing significantly — a clear sign that market participants are de-risking amid fear and uncertainty.

The most notable feature on the chart is Bitcoin’s test of the 50-week moving average (blue line), which currently sits near $95,000. Historically, this level has acted as a key support zone during mid-cycle corrections, helping to stabilize price before major recoveries. A confirmed weekly close below this moving average, however, could shift momentum firmly in favor of the bears, opening the door for a potential retest of the $88,000–$90,000 region near the 100-week MA (green line).

Despite the bearish tone, there’s also evidence of potential accumulation. Volume spikes during declines often indicate that larger players are stepping in to absorb selling pressure. If Bitcoin can hold above $95,000 and reclaim $100,000 in the coming weeks, it could form a solid base for recovery. Conversely, failure to defend this area would reinforce the narrative that the market is entering a deeper correction phase.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

While the European Union (EU) authorities are pushing to shift oversight of key financial markets, including crypto, to a centralized supervisory authority, some industry players have shared multiple concerns about the proposal.

EU’s Plan For Crypto Oversight Shift Raises Concerns

On Friday, Bloomberg affirmed that the European Commission (EC) is pressing to advance its proposal to transfer regulatory supervision of the crypto businesses from national authorities to the bloc’s market watchdog, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).

As reported by Bitcoinist, ESMA’s Chair, Verena Ross, stated last month that the EU’s executive arm was preparing rules to give new powers to the regional watchdog to push for a “more integrated and globally competitive” capital market in Europe.

Ross argued that “while we are doing a lot of work to try to make sure the implementation of MiCA is aligned, it clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve that.”

“It also means that people had to build up specific new resources and expertise 27 times in different national supervisors, which could have been done more efficiently once at a European level,” she continued.

According to the Friday report, draft plans circulated by EU officials propose that the bloc’s market watchdog be responsible for authorizing new businesses and the main supervisor for all Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASP). This was initially suggested during the development of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).

Nonetheless, some consider that the move could overturn the work that national watchdogs and businesses have done over the past few years to regulate the industry and implement the bloc’s comprehensive framework for digital assets.

Robert Kopitsch, secretary general of Blockchain for Europe, an organization that represents international Blockchain industry players in the EU, told Bloomberg that “reopening MiCA at this stage would introduce legal uncertainty, risk delaying the authorization process, and divert attention and resources from the practical task of consistent implementation.”

Kopitsch affirmed that a shift to a more centralized supervisory model should happen in the future, based on “concrete experience and evidence gathered from MiCA’s first years of implementation,” noting that local regulators have had closer day-to-day engagement with firms.

Meanwhile, Andrew Whitworth, founder of Global Policy Ltd., a consulting firm that works with crypto companies and regulators, believes that digital assets could be a good test for ESMA’s ability to take on more responsibilities. However, it would require additional resources to handle the workload currently managed by local regulators.

He emphasized that the change would be difficult at the time, “given where we’re at with implementation for the goalposts to change.”

‘Institutional Standoff’ To Undermine MiCA?

Notably, smaller EU nations, including Luxembourg, Ireland, and Malta, have also questioned the proposal and ESMA’s ability to oversee the rapidly growing crypto market, claiming it could weaken their financial sectors.

Recently, Judith Arnal, associate senior research fellow at the Centre for European Credit Research Institute (ECRI) and board member at the Bank of Spain, affirmed that the ongoing “institutional standoff has created regulatory paralysis with far-reaching consequences.”

Arnal has argued that the recent attempts to already amend the bloc’s crypto rules, particularly in the stablecoins sector, risk “undermining MiCA’s credibility as a coherent and globally influential regulatory framework.”

Earlier this week, the European Banking Authority (EBA) addressed the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB)’s concerns about financial instability risk related to stablecoins.

The ECB has recently been calling for stricter regulations, including a ban on multi-issuance stablecoins in the bloc and other jurisdictions. However, the region’s banking supervisor defended the framework, arguing that MiCA already has safeguards against risks posed by stablecoins.

On-chain data shows Ethereum investors with a holding time greater than three years have ramped up their selling to levels not seen since 2021.

Seasoned Ethereum Holders Are Increasing Their Distribution

As explained by on-chain analytics firm Glassnode in a new post on X, the 3 to 10 years old Ethereum holders have notably raised their spending recently. These investors belong to a broader group known as the long-term holder (LTH) cohort, which has a holding time cutoff of 155 days.

Statistically, the longer an investor holds onto their coins, the less likely they become to sell them at any point. As such, the LTHs as a whole can be considered diamond hands.

Since the 3 to 10 years old ETH investors would be old even by the standard of the LTHs, they may be assumed to include the most stalwart of HODLers. Given this stature of the cohort, the behavior of its investors may be worth keeping an eye on, for selling from them could be a sign that market conditions have forced even the most seasoned hands into exiting.

One way to track the behavior of the group is through the Spent Volume by Age indicator, which tracks the transactions that the various investor age bands are making on the blockchain. Below is the chart for the metric shared by Glassnode that shows the trend in its 90-day moving average (MA) for Ethereum over the last few years.

As displayed in the graph, the Spent Volume by Age has shot up for the investors belonging in the 3 to 10 years holding time bracket since late-August. At present, the 90-day MA is sitting above 45,000 ETH, meaning the veterans of the market are selling tokens worth $139 million every day.

“This marks the highest spending level by seasoned investors since Feb 2021,” noted the analytics firm. Besides the selloff in February, this group also participated in almost the same level of distribution alongside the bull run top in the second half of that year.

As the latest wave of selling has arrived, Ethereum has witnessed bearish momentum. It only remains to be seen whether this decline in the price would lead into another bear market like in late 2021, or if the bull run will regain its footing as in February 2021.

LTH selling isn’t the only bearish factor that ETH has had to deal with recently. As the chart shared by CryptoQuant community analyst Maartunn shows, the Ethereum spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have witnessed significant outflows over the past month.

From the above chart, it’s apparent that Ethereum spot ETFs are seeing a negative 30-day netflow of $1.21 billion, while Bitcoin has had it even worse with $2.80 billion in net outflows.

ETH Price

At the time of writing, Ethereum is trading around $3,100, down over 4% in the last week.

Bitcoin has fallen below the crucial $100,000 mark, now trading near $97,000 for the first time since May. The drop underscores the growing weakness in bullish momentum, as traders struggle to defend key support levels amid mounting macroeconomic uncertainty and fading risk appetite. Market sentiment has turned sharply fearful, with investors showing increased caution following a wave of liquidations and declining volume across major exchanges.

According to data shared by CryptoQuant analyst Axel Adler, Bitcoin’s performance has notably lagged behind traditional assets. Year-to-date, BTC is up just 5.5%, a gain that now risks evaporating entirely if current conditions persist. In stark contrast, gold surged 5.6% in just the last week, continuing its strong rally as investors seek safer havens amid global volatility.

While Bitcoin’s long-term structure remains intact, its short-term weakness reflects a tightening liquidity environment and growing skepticism about risk assets.

Bitcoin Faces Harsh Comparison As Traditional Markets Outperform

Axel Adler highlights how Bitcoin’s muted performance stands in sharp contrast to the impressive gains seen across traditional markets this year. His analysis paints a sobering picture of where capital has been flowing in 2025.

Gold leads the pack with a staggering 55% year-to-date (YTD) increase, driven by global uncertainty and strong institutional demand. Copper follows with +27%, benefiting from industrial expansion and supply constraints. Meanwhile, risk assets like the Nasdaq (+21%) and S&P 500 (+16%) have also delivered consistent returns, reflecting continued investor confidence in equities despite macroeconomic headwinds.

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin’s modest 5.5% YTD gain appears increasingly underwhelming. Adler notes that professional fund managers are often measured against the S&P 500 benchmark, meaning any underperformance tends to attract swift scrutiny. “If a fund manager delivers less than the S&P 500, they usually don’t stay in the job for long,” Adler remarks — a pointed reminder of how traditional assets continue to set the standard for performance.

His final comment cuts to the heart of the matter: “You don’t need a Harvard degree to buy SPY.” The implication is clear — in a market where simplicity and stability outperform speculation, Bitcoin must prove its resilience or risk losing investor attention.

Bitcoin Slips Below $100K as Selling Pressure Builds

Bitcoin’s price has fallen sharply below the psychological $100,000 mark, currently hovering around $97,300 after losing more than 2% in the past 24 hours. The daily chart reveals a clear continuation of the recent downtrend, with BTC now trading well below its 50-day and 100-day moving averages, signaling sustained weakness in short-term momentum.

The next significant support zone sits near $94,000, where Bitcoin previously consolidated in early summer. A decisive breakdown below this level could open the door to deeper retracements toward the 200-day moving average near $88,000–$90,000. On the flip side, reclaiming $100,000 as support will be crucial for any potential recovery, as that level now acts as a strong resistance barrier.

Volume data shows an uptick in sell-side activity, confirming growing pressure from profit-taking and possible liquidations. Despite the pullback, analysts suggest that the recent correction may serve as a market reset, allowing leverage to unwind and preparing for a healthier recovery phase.

Bitcoin remains in a volatile consolidation period, with macro uncertainty and exchange inflows weighing on sentiment. Bulls must defend current levels to prevent momentum from shifting decisively toward a deeper mid-cycle correction.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

A senior VanEck executive has reignited a long-running debate over XRP’s real-world utility, questioning both the relevance of the XRP Ledger and the economic case for holding the token—just as a new spot ETF has posted the strongest launch numbers of any fund this year.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, took direct aim at supporters on X, opening with a post that combined sarcasm and skepticism. “Dear XRP maxis,” he wrote, “I may never understand what your ‘blockchain’ actually does, but I’ll always respect the passion required to pretend it does something. So keep hustling!”

XRP Utility Debate Reignites

The tone set the stage for a thread that pushed beyond memes into pointed questions about developer activity and value accrual. In a follow-up post, Sigel asked: “Genuine question: has any developer ever woken up and said, ‘Time to build… on XRP’? Would love citations.”

Hours later, he underscored the lack of detailed responses from the community with a terse update: “Zero replies so far”. The challenge is clear. In a market where developer traction and on-chain activity are often treated as proxies for network value, Sigel is not just criticizing the narrative, but demanding evidence that ledger is actually a target platform for builders.

When an supporter pointed to Ondo Finance launching its OUSG tokenized Treasury fund on the XRP Ledger as proof the ecosystem is active, Sigel shifted the discussion to token economics.

“Cool initiative, but does any of this actually accrue value to XRP token holders? I’m not aware of any fee capture, revenue share, burn, or economic linkage. I think maybe I’m not smart enough to understand but I’ll keep trying to learn and update my views!”

The exchange also touched on the fortunes created around the token and the controversies attached to them. After one user sarcastically wrote that XRP had “funded a whole company [Ripple] on nothing and got a few billionaires out of it,” Sigel replied: “Like the one who funded Greenpeace’s ‘Change the Code’ campaign to pressure Bitcoin into abandoning PoW? Quite a legacy.”

The remark alludes to the well-known funding of Greenpeace’s anti–proof-of-work campaign by a Ripple co-founder, a move that has long polarized Bitcoin and XRP communities.

When another commenter accused him of trying to “hold ppl back” from investing in the token and dismissed Bitcoin as “completely speculative,” Sigel contrasted the two assets in terms of institutional adoption and state-level engagement.

He argued that “retail investors like University Endowments, Sovereign Wealth Funds, and today a Central Bank” are now in bitcoin, and claimed that “12 countries are now mining Bitcoin with direct government support, thanks to its synergies with the electrical grid,” before adding, “Anyway by all means, invest away in XRP. I’m not stopping you.”

The thread drew in Solana Foundation’s Vibhu Norby, who has previously clashed with the XRP community but here offered a more reconciliatory, if still critical, framing.

“XRP is a SoV coin similar to Bitcoin with cheaper fees wrapped in 13 years of payments mythology. Instead of Satoshi, the collective unconscious of the XRP Army centers around a company (which btw happens to be very well run). The XRPL has minimal usage for transactions compared to smart contract blockchains, but it is not important to its value just like Bitcoin has minimal transactions compared to smart contract blockchains but it is not important to its value,” Norby commented.

All of this unfolded against a striking market backdrop. Canary Capital’s spot ETF XRPC, began trading on November 13 and generated around $58 million in first-day volume, including $26 million in its first hour—enough to make it the biggest ETF debut of 2025 so far and narrowly surpass the launch-day volume of Bitwise’s Solana ETF, BSOL. The two funds now define the upper tier of single-asset ETF launches this year, with the next-best newcomer more than $20 million behind in day-one trading.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.27.

Bitcoin faced renewed selling pressure this week as large investment funds pulled money out at a pace not seen in months.

Reports from Farside Investors showed that spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $866 million in withdrawals on Thursday, a sharp move that arrived even after the US government reopened following a 43-day shutdown.

The flow of money leaving these funds caught the attention of traders who had expected a stronger reaction once political uncertainty cleared.

Heavy Withdrawals Hit Major Bitcoin Funds

According to new data, this wave of outflows marked the second straight session of losses for US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs.

A separate reading from SoSoValue pointed to nearly $897 million leaving those products on the same day, suggesting widespread pullback from institutional players.

The shift surprised some market watchers because ETF inflows had been one of the main drivers of Bitcoin’s strong run earlier in 2025.

Those who entered Bitcoin 6 to 12 months ago have a cost basis near 94K.

Personally, I do not think the bear cycle is confirmed unless we lose that level. I would rather wait than jump to conclusions. pic.twitter.com/i9a5M0xnMW

— Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) November 14, 2025

Ki Young Ju of CryptoQuant warned that the broader uptrend could weaken if Bitcoin falls below $94,000, which he identified as the average buying level for holders who entered during the past six to 12 months.

XRP Fund Shines Amid Market Pressure

While Bitcoin funds struggled, one new altcoin product posted an unusually strong debut. The Canary Capital XRP (XRPC) ETF reached $58 million in first-day trading volume, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas.

That figure barely topped the $57 million logged by a Solana ETF earlier this year, but it still ranked as the biggest opening among roughly 900 ETF launches in 2025.

Reports also noted that Ether ETFs faced $259 million in withdrawals on Thursday, while Solana ETFs extended a 13-day run of inflows by adding another $1.5 million.

Rate Cut Doubts Add To The Slide

Bitcoin slid under the $100,000 line on Friday and traded around $96,900 by 00:00 ET (05:00 GMT). It dipped to an intraday low of $96,650, pressured by fading hopes of a Federal Reserve rate cut in December.

Markets now price about a 45% chance of a 25 basis point cut at the December 10-11 meeting, down from 63% a week earlier.

The government shutdown created gaps in official inflation and jobs data, leaving the Fed with fewer signals to work with and keeping traders cautious about taking on risk.

Mixed Sentiment As Crypto Heads Into The Weekend

Institutional demand has been cooling, shown by repeated outflows and slowing treasury purchases. Some analysts believe the market has been in a quiet bearish phase for months.

Hunter Horsley of Bitwise said the downturn may be closer to ending than many assume, although broader risk markets have offered little support.

Others caution that continued ETF withdrawals could extend Bitcoin’s losing streak, which is now headed toward a third week.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView