源聚合

A growing legal clash over prediction markets in the United States is intensifying after federal regulators aligned with the Trump administration stepped in to support industry operators Kalshi and Polymarket, even as Nevada moves forward with enforcement action to shut down parts of their businesses.

The dispute raises a broader question facing courts and regulators: whether prediction markets are financial products governed by federal law or a form of online gambling subject to state control.

The latest developments came after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected Kalshi’s request to pause enforcement actions by Nevada regulators. Within hours of the decision, the Nevada Gaming Control Board filed a civil lawsuit seeking to block the platform from offering sports-related event contracts to state residents.

Nevada Pushes Gambling Enforcement

Nevada regulators argue that Kalshi’s event contracts, which allow users to trade on outcomes such as sports results, function similarly to traditional sports betting and therefore require a state gaming license.

Officials say the company is offering unlicensed wagering that violates Nevada’s gaming laws and undermines the state’s tightly regulated betting market.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction that could force Kalshi to halt its local operations while litigation continues. The state has taken similar action against other platforms, reflecting a wider effort by multiple jurisdictions to limit prediction markets they view as gambling products.

Kalshi disputes that characterization, maintaining that its contracts are financial derivatives, not bets. The company operates as a federally regulated exchange and has moved to have the case transferred to federal court, arguing that state laws are preempted by federal oversight.

Federal Regulators Enter the Fight

At the center of the dispute is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which, under Chairman Michael Selig, has taken a more active stance in defending prediction markets. The agency filed an amicus brief supporting federal jurisdiction, arguing that states cannot reclassify federally regulated derivatives trading as illegal gambling.

The Trump administration’s backing of Kalshi and Polymarket shows a broader policy shift toward treating prediction markets as part of the financial system rather than the gambling industry. Federal officials argue that allowing individual states to impose bans could create fragmented regulation and undermine national derivatives markets.

Prediction platforms allow participants to buy contracts priced between one and 99 cents based on the probability of real-world events occurring. While markets cover politics, economics, and weather outcomes, sports-related contracts account for the majority of trading volume.

What Comes Next for Prediction Markets

The legal battle is unfolding across several courts and could ultimately determine who regulates prediction markets nationwide. States, including Massachusetts, Tennessee, and others, have issued lawsuits or cease-and-desist orders, while operators continue to argue for federal protection.

Nevada’s enforcement action increases immediate pressure on Kalshi, though appeals, including a potential emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court, remain possible.

The outcome could reshape how Americans participate in event-based trading and define the boundary between financial speculation and online gambling for years to come.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

The crypto market continues to face sustained selling pressure, with sentiment increasingly shaped by caution and, in some segments, outright panic. After the strong rally that culminated in late 2025, price action across major digital assets has shifted into a defensive phase. Bitcoin, for example, is currently trading near $68,800, a significant decline from its all-time high above $125,000 recorded in October 2025. This retracement has coincided with broader weakness across altcoins, where volatility and liquidity conditions remain fragile.

Recent on-chain analysis from CryptoQuant highlights the scale of this shift. According to the report, altcoin selling pressure has reached a five-year extreme, reflected in a cumulative Buy/Sell Difference of approximately -$209 billion when excluding Bitcoin and Ethereum. Notably, as recently as January 2025, this metric was close to neutral, indicating a balance between demand and supply. Since then, however, flows have moved consistently in one direction, pointing to persistent distribution rather than episodic selling.

Such prolonged imbalance typically signals structural repositioning rather than short-term volatility alone. While this does not automatically confirm a prolonged bear phase, it suggests the market is still absorbing excess supply. Investors, therefore, remain focused on liquidity trends, macro conditions, and whether demand can stabilize in the coming months.

Sustained Outflows Point To Weak Altcoin Demand

According to the analyst, recent on-chain data suggest a structural shift in crypto market participation rather than a temporary pullback. Retail activity appears to have faded significantly, while capital traditionally categorized as “smart money” has largely rotated away from altcoins. Notably, there are currently few signs of meaningful institutional accumulation across the altcoin segment, reinforcing the perception of reduced risk appetite.

The cumulative Buy/Sell Difference for altcoins excluding Bitcoin and Ethereum has reached approximately -$209 billion over the past 13 months. Importantly, this figure reflects persistent net selling on centralized exchange spot markets rather than isolated liquidation events. The continuous nature of these outflows distinguishes the current phase from typical short-lived corrections driven by leverage flushes or episodic panic.

Such sustained distribution implies that liquidity support from marginal buyers has weakened considerably. In practical terms, this does not automatically signal a market bottom; instead, it indicates a period in which demand has yet to re-establish equilibrium with supply.

Historically, recovery phases tend to begin only after new buyers return decisively. Until that shift materializes, altcoin price action may remain subdued, with consolidation or further downside risk still plausible.

Crypto Market Cap Weakens As Capital Concentrates In Major Assets

The total crypto market capitalization excluding the top ten assets continues to show structural weakness, reflecting sustained capital rotation away from smaller altcoins. The chart highlights a clear decline following the late-2025 peak, with market cap retracing toward the $170–180 billion region after previously trading above $400 billion. This sharp contraction suggests reduced risk appetite and diminished speculative participation across the broader altcoin sector.

Price structure also remains technically fragile. The market cap has fallen below key moving averages, which are now trending downward and acting as dynamic resistance. Historically, this configuration tends to accompany extended consolidation phases or gradual distribution rather than immediate recovery. Until price can reclaim these averages convincingly, upside momentum is likely to remain limited.

Volume patterns reinforce this interpretation. Selling activity increased notably during the recent breakdown, indicating active capital withdrawal rather than simple inactivity. Although some stabilization appears near current levels, the absence of strong accumulation signals suggests buyers remain cautious.

From a broader market perspective, this divergence often coincides with capital concentration into Bitcoin, Ethereum, or stablecoins during uncertain conditions. Whether this phase evolves into a base formation or deeper correction will depend largely on liquidity returning to the altcoin segment and improving overall risk sentiment.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com