源聚合

Биткоин 15–16 декабря потерял около 5% стоимости, опускавшись до $85120. Падение первой криптовалюты могла спровоцировать распродажа актива корпоративными инвесторами и значительный отток средств из спотовых ETF на биткоины, сообщили аналитики платформы Farside.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has announced a new framework that outlines how banks can apply to issue payment stablecoins through subsidiaries as part of the implementation of the country’s stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act. 

FDIC’s First Move On GENIUS Act

In a statement, Acting Chair Travis Hill emphasized that the proposed process is tailored to allow the FDIC to thoroughly evaluate the safety and soundness of applications from banks seeking to enter the stablecoin market. 

According to a summary from FDIC staff, banks wishing to issue payment stablecoins will need to submit detailed applications outlining various aspects of their proposed activities.

Each application must include a description of the intended payment stablecoin, along with a comprehensive overview of the subsidiary’s activities. 

Additionally, institutions must provide financial information, details regarding the ownership and control structure of the subsidiary, and pertinent policies related to customer agreements, including provisions for custody. Applicants will need to submit an engagement letter from a registered public accounting firm.

30-Day Review Period For Stablecoin Applications

The FDIC aims to promptly review submissions, notifying stablecoin applicants within 30 days whether their application has been deemed substantially complete. Following that, the agency must make a decision on approval within 120 days from the time the application reaches this status.

“This proposed rule is the FDIC’s first action to implement the GENIUS Act,” stated Acting Chairman Travis Hill. He added that in the coming months, the agency plans to introduce proposals to establish the required management standards for subsidiaries of FDIC-supervised institutions that are approved to issue payment stablecoins. 

The FDIC is also committed to providing comprehensive regulatory clarity regarding activities associated with digital assets and tokenized deposits. The plan will undergo a public consultation period before it can be finalized.

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Following the sudden pullback observed across the cryptocurrency market, the price of XRP has fallen sharply, causing it to revisit the $1.8 threshold. With XRP’s price facing heightened bearish pressure, traders appear to be stepping back, raising questions about the current price action.

Leverage Unwinds Across XRP Markets

XRP’s waning price action is starting to trigger a crucial shift in investors’ action and sentiment toward the leading altcoin. A widely monitored derivatives metric outlined by Arab Chain, an author at CryptoQuant, is still trending lower, suggesting that the market risk balance for the altcoin is subtly recalibrating.

Specifically, the Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR) for XRP, a metric that monitors the amount of borrowed capital traders use in relation to exchange balances, is showing a persistent downtrend. Typically, a continued decline in the measure is a clear sign of reduced risk in the derivatives market.

After examining the XRP’s ELR on Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Arab Chain found a persistent decrease to roughly 0.18, reflecting a clear sign of caution in the XRP market on Binance. It is worth noting that this position is one of the lowest levels recorded during the ongoing period, as the price of the token trades close to the $2.00 mark.

Arab Chain highlighted that the drastic decline in the ELR suggests that investors’ reliance on decrease is decreasing, meaning that most of the funded positions have been closed or limited. Structurally, a decline in leverage is seen as an indication of reduced market fragility.

When this occurs, it lowers the likelihood of forced liquidations, which are caused by sudden price movements. As the market tends to lower risk and reset open positions, this behavior usually happens following times of increased volatility or price corrections. 

Interestingly, the drop is occurring along with a downward trend in XRP’s price compared to its previous levels above $3.00. This synchronicity is a sign that the accumulation of highly leveraged positions does not fuel the price decline. Rather, it is riven by the unwinding of such positions.

In the past, environments like these typically marked transitional phases. During this period, the market transitions from active speculation to a calmer phase concentrated on rebalancing. 

A Stabilization To Kickstart A Rally

Once the metric starts to stabilize again at a relatively low level, Arab Chain noted that it could lay the foundation for more substantial XRP price movements in the future. However, this is expected to happen once liquidity slowly returns to the derivatives market in the absence of excessive leverage.

In other words, low leverage would make any future rally less likely to see a dramatic reversal. While the ELR sits at 0.18, the market is still reconstructing itself and creating a more balanced base prior to calculating its next major direction. Whether it resumes its upside direction or enters a prolonged consolidation phase depends heavily on the metric’s movement.

Crypto pundit Chain Cartel has raised several key points following SWIFT’s latest comment on its move to adopt blockchain technology. The pundit claimed that Ripple’s XRPL network best suits what SWIFT is trying to achieve and suggested that the two firms collaborate. 

Pundit Points To Ripple’s XRPL After SWIFT’s Announcement

In an X post, Chain Cartel stated that SWIFT admitted they are building Ripple’s XRPL network, but did not explicitly say so in their announcement. The pundit was referring to an X post from SWIFT highlighting their earlier announcement to add a blockchain-based ledger to their infrastructure.

The pundit explained that SWIFT’s language in the X post suggests that they want to build something like Ripple’s XRPL. He declared that it is not Bitcoin, Ethereum, or any generic blockchain experiment but precisely what Ripple has been building for a decade. Chain Cartel noted that Ripple’s model has always been a neutral settlement layer, real-time atomic finality, shared ledger visibility for institutions, interoperability with legacy rails, and liquidity-first design. 

Chain Cartel then alluded to SWIFT’s statement about its plans to build a blockchain-based ledger to be included in its payment infrastructure and provide a single source of truth, enabling instant, 24/7 cross-border payments. He declared that this is Ripple’s blueprints with the XRPL, as the crypto firm uses the network for its payment services. 

In line with this, the pundit remarked that SWIFT doesn’t replace rails, but instead coordinates them, and that Ripple doesn’t replace banks, but instead connects them. He added that SWIFT is acknowledging that the future payment stack requires a ledger layer, not just messaging, and that the only model already battle-tested at scale is Ripple’s XRPL.

However, it is worth mentioning that SWIFT doesn’t plan to integrate Ripple’s Ledger. Instead, it is building this blockchain-based ledger in partnership with Consensys and Chainlink. As such, although SWIFT may plan to build a network similar to Ripple’s XRPL, it intends to do so without assistance from the crypto firm. 

Ripple Looking To Expand Its Payment Service

Ripple is looking to expand its payment service, as it recently announced plans to begin testing its RLUSD stablecoin on Ethereum layer-2 networks Base, Ink, Optimism, and Unichain. The move comes just days after the OCC granted Ripple a conditional approval to become a bank, which is also a major boost for the firm’s payment service. 

Ripple plans to expand its RLUSD stablecoin beyond the Ethereum and XRPL networks to these layer-2 networks through its partnership with Wormhole. The firm noted that the future of crypto is multichain, which is why it is adopting this strategy. This move gives Ripple’s clients greater options when using the RLUSD stablecoin, and it could also attract new users to the stablecoin, which is currently one of the fastest-growing stablecoins. 

Доля владельцев криптовалют среди жителей Великобритании сократилась до 8%, сообщили авторы исследования, проведенного Управлением по финансовому надзору Великобритании (FCA) при участии платформы YouGov.

Работающий с криптовалютами Custodia Bank обратился в Десятый окружной апелляционный суд США с просьбой пересмотреть решение суда штата Вайоминг, поддержавшего отказ Федеральной резервной системы США предоставить необанку доступ к своим платежным системам.

As volatility weighs heavily on the market, fresh insights are shedding light on who is really driving activity in the XRP ecosystem. A crypto analyst has shared new observations, revealing that a specific demographic continues to dominate XRP trading activity. The analyst explained that this trend has held steady despite the cryptocurrency experiencing notable downside momentum, with prices sliding to new lows amid broader market uncertainty.

Analyst Says Whales Are Dominating XRP 

A recent analysis report by market expert Xaif Crypto suggests that whales remain the dominant demographic influencing price action. He shared a chart on X highlighting Spot Average Order Size on the XRP Ledger, showing normal, retail, and big and small whale orders. 

The analyst noted that the recent spike in XRP trading has been driven primarily by whales. According to his report, this trend has persisted despite the altcoin entering a period of short-term price weakness. The cryptocurrency has recently declined toward its lowest price levels this year, raising concerns among smaller investors. 

Xaif Crypto explained that this type of behavior from whales is often seen during market bottoming phases. He emphasized that large holders typically increase accumulation when prices are depressed and avoid aggressive buying once a strong uptrend is already underway. The analyst also noted that this strategy suggests whales may be positioning themselves ahead of a potential recovery in XRP’s price.

The continued presence of whales has also helped stabilize liquidity to some degree during the ongoing decline. While retail traders may hesitate amid falling prices, whale activity tends to prevent sharp breakdowns by absorbing significant selling pressure. 

Buying Sentiment Surges Amid Price Weakness

A CryptoQuant analyst who also highlighted that XRP’s trading activity continues to be dominated by whales has observed a notable change in the cryptocurrency’s Spot Taker CVD. According to the analyst’s report, XRP’s Spot Taker CVD has entered a taker-buy dominant trend. This shift suggests that aggressive buyers are now outweighing sellers, often interpreted as a sign of strengthening market sentiment and potential upside for price action.

These market changes follow XRP’s sharp drop, which has pushed its price below $2 for the first time in months. The cryptocurrency has struggled to break through resistance zones needed to establish new highs, keeping overall sentiment cautious among traders. 

At present, XRP is trading around $1.82, down more than 6% over the past 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. Over the past week, the cryptocurrency’s price has fallen by nearly 9%, adding to the broader bearish outlook. XRP’s year-to-date performance is also negative, with the cryptocurrency losing about 22% of its value so far. 

Despite these severe declines, buying activity has increased significantly. Additionally, daily trading volume has surged by more than 97%, suggesting renewed interest as whales continue to shape the market’s direction. 

Инвестиционный директор Bitwise Мэтт Хоуган (Matt Hougan) уверен, что биткоин больше не следует четырехлетней закономерности, согласно которой после проведения халвинга курс биткоина растет в течение нескольких лет, а затем крипторынок уходит в медвежий тренд.

Биткоин снова уперся в собственный парадокс: чем он ценнее как «база доверия», тем сильнее хочется использовать его не только как хранилище, но и как средство для платежей, DeFi и ончейн‑продуктов. И тут начинаются проблемы. Базовый слой Bitcoin по дизайну медленный, ограниченный по пропускной способности и дорогой в периоды перегрева. На нем далеко не уехать. Да, бывают окна «дешевого» мемпула — но рынок уже понял, что стабильная UX‑модель не строится на удаче.

В 2025‑м эта тема звучит еще громче из‑за дискуссии вокруг «комиссионного будущего» сети. Когда комиссии падают, пользователям приятно, майнерам — не очень, и это запускает неприятные вопросы о долгосрочной устойчивости модели безопасности после халвинга. Cointelegraph, ссылаясь на Galaxy Digital, писал, что дневные комиссии Bitcoin обвалились более чем на 80% относительно апреля 2024 года, а часть блоков фактически «почти бесплатная».

На этом фоне внимание к Bitcoin Layer 2 и инфраструктуре вокруг $BTC выглядит не модой, а прагматикой. Если ликвидность и доверие — в Bitcoin, то где будет исполняться «быстрый» финансовый слой? Именно поэтому такие истории, как Bitcoin Hyper, начинают собирать спрос еще до выхода продукта: рынок покупает не только токен, а ставку на архитектурный сдвиг — исполнение вне L1, финальная безопасность через L1.

КУПИТЬ BITCOIN HYPER

Почему нарратив Bitcoin Layer 2 снова возвращается в 2025 году

Ралли интереса к Bitcoin L2 подпитывается сразу двумя силами: UX и экономика. UX — потому что пользователи и билдеры привыкли к почти мгновенным подтверждениям и копеечным комиссиям в других экосистемах. Экономика — потому что «пустой мемпул» звучит хорошо до тех пор, пока вы не задаетесь вопросом: а что будет поддерживать рынок комиссий в долгую? Отсюда и рост обсуждений тезиса про перенос активности, которая генерирует комиссии и удерживает пользователей, в «надстройки» вокруг Bitcoin.

В конкурентном поле тоже происходит любопытное расслоение. Одни команды идут в сторону BitVM/zk‑нарративов и мостов, пытаясь минимизировать доверие к бриджам и повысить безопасность выхода в $BTC. Например, Citrea в 2025 году выкатывала крупные апгрейды тестнета и работала над BitVM‑основанной мостовой архитектурой, параллельно снижая комиссии на уровне системы.

Другие экосистемы делают ставку на «Bitcoin‑ориентированные» смарт‑контракты и ускорение исполнения транзакций поверх Bitcoin‑сеттламента (тот же Stacks исторически двигался в эту сторону через крупные апгрейды). В этом ландшафте Bitcoin Hyper — еще один вариант ставки, но с иной технической интонацией: скорость и девелоперский стек как главный крючок. И, если честно, именно это сейчас лучше всего «продается» разработчикам: меньше ожидания, больше результата.

Почему SVM на Bitcoin может стать настоящим магнитом спроса

У Bitcoin Hyper ставка предельно ясная (и слегка дерзкая): принести Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) в Bitcoin Layer 2 и получить исполнение смарт‑контрактов с экстремально низкой задержкой — проект прямо обещает производительность «быстрее, чем Solana». Это важно, потому что для DeFi, игр и высокочастотных сценариев задержка — не косметика, а экономика продукта: арбитраж, ликвидации, MEV‑динамика, UX в платежах. Чем быстрее «кухня» исполнения, тем выше потолок по сценариям.

Архитектурно месседж тоже попадает в нерв рынка: модульная схема, где Bitcoin L1 выступает базовым слоем, а реальные расчеты уносятся в L2. Да, у модели есть компромисс — заявлен single trusted sequencer с периодическим якорением состояния в L1. Риск тут очевиден: централизация последовательности транзакций и потенциальные точки отказа/цензуры на уровне секвенсора (как бы ни был красив мост и SDK). Но вот что многие упускают: на ранней стадии рынок часто покупает не «идеальную децентрализацию», а скорость выхода экосистемы и время до product‑market fit. Точнее — баланс: чуть меньше идеала сегодня, чтобы не потерять темп завтра.

Спрос на историю подкрепляется и цифрами: пресейл уже привлек $29,5 млн при цене токена $0,013435. Вдобавок данные по крупным адресам показывают две заметные покупки примерно на $396 тыс.; самая крупная транзакция — около $53 тыс. (19 ноября 2025 года). Это не гарантия роста, но сигнал: часть капитала явно хочет экспозицию к нарративу «Bitcoin L2 + быстрые смарт‑контракты». И да — для многих это выглядит логичнее, чем просто держать еще один «L1 ради L1».

Дальше будет решать не лозунг, а три метрики: качество бриджа для BTC‑перетоков, реально достижимая задержка/стоимость исполнения и способность привлечь билдеров (Rust‑ориентированный SDK тут играет в плюс). Для понимания полезно сравнить, что именно рынок «покупает» сейчас: технологию, бренд или ликвидность — см. список лучших монет на 2025 год.

Solana has been battling what some ecosystem builders are calling an internet-scale DDoS campaign — and, despite the usual “Solana is fragile” jokes, the network seems to be shrugging it off.

Pipe Network said of the ongoing attack via X today: “The ongoing DDoS attack on Solana is one of the largest in internet history. 6 Tbps volumetric attack translates to billions of packets per second. Under that kind of load, you’d normally expect rising latency, missed slots, or confirmation delays.”

Pipe further says that’s not what the data is showing. “Median tx confirmation ~450ms,” the team wrote, adding that p90 remains under 700ms and slot latency is holding at 0–1 slots. In other words, if you’re a regular user or trader, you might not even know anything’s happening. Which is kind of the point.

Reactions From The Solana Community

Raj Gokal, Solana Labs’ co-founder and COO, put it more bluntly in a reply to a broader DDoS debate: “have you heard about the ongoing DDOS against Solana that has had zero effect on performance?”

The backdrop here matters. Justin Bons had posted about Sui being DDoS’d yesterday, claiming it triggered “mass delays” and arguing that “127 validators is not enough,” with the broader warning: don’t let validator counts drift too low if you want a chain to be resilient.

Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius, largely agreed with the premise — but pushed back on the simplistic “more validators = solved” framing.

“I understand your point & mostly agree with you,” Mert wrote, before adding that “a chain is more resistant to DDoS with 100 professional high powered validators compared to 10k validators run by amateurs.” He also said there are scenarios where higher validator count can help, but emphasized it isn’t the core defense by itself. Then he dropped the key detail: Solana’s attack hasn’t been a one-day headline, it’s been going on for a while.

“And fyi there has been a colossal ddos attack on Solana for weeks now,” Mert wrote, later adding that Solana “has been under a colossal DDoS attack for at least over a week now btw” — and that the fact most users haven’t felt it is “a big testament to the level of engineering present here.”

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko chimed in with a more technical angle on why validator count can matter in specific leader-hand-off dynamics: “Validators count helps if the previous leader can finish their block while the current one is being hit. Then the cost of ddos approaches the cost of ddos the whole network.”

Translation: if an attacker wants to reliably disrupt block production, they may have to sustain pressure across more of the network, not just pick off a single leader at the wrong moment. That gets expensive fast.

SolanaFloor summed it up via X: “Solana has been under a sustained DDoS attack for the past week, peaking near 6 Tbps, the 4th largest attack ever recorded for any distributed system. Network data shows no impact, with sub second confirmations and stable slot latency. The Sui network was also targeted by a DDoS attack yesterday, resulting in delays in block production and periods of degraded network performance.”

And there’s a more strategic takeaway that’s starting to sound less theoretical each month: blockchains are now juicy targets. David Rhodus, founder of Permissionless Labs (and a contributor to Pipe Network), said: “This puts Solana among the most heavily DDoSed targets in internet history. It reinforces that blockchains are now Tier-1 DDoS targets. This is not “script kiddie” activity — 6 Tbps is industrial-scale.”

If you’re a validator, Mumtaz offered the practical advice you’d expect in a week like this: have backups across multiple hosting providers and regions. Because even if the chain holds, your own infrastructure might not.

The broader point, though, is the new baseline: these networks are getting stress-tested like mainstream internet services now. Solana’s claim today is that it passed — quietly, under load, and without users noticing. That’s the kind of victory that doesn’t look dramatic on a chart. It just […] works.

At press time, Solana traded at $126.