源聚合

US President Donald Trump’s advisory group is looking at a plan to issue a US dollar-backed stablecoin to help people in Gaza who face severe cash shortages and broken banking services.

The plan is being talked about by the Board of Peace and a handful of outside advisers. Based on reports by the Financial Times, the pitch aims to let aid and basic trade carry on even when ATMs and regular banks are offline.

$1 Billion Membership

Membership in the board requires a $1 billion contribution, according to reports, a condition that has fueled debate over influence and oversight. Trump announced the assembly of the board in January.

The effort has technical backers. One name tied to early planning is Liran Tancman, who has been linked to discussions with the territory’s technocratic team, the National Committee For The Administration Of Gaza.

They have talked about a currency token that would be pegged to the dollar, with reserves and systems that would allow people and aid groups to buy food, medicine, and fuel without needing functioning local banks.

Officials advising Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” are exploring a US dollar-backed crypto stablecoin for Gaza.

According to the Financial Times, this crypto concept is in an exploratory phase, but it could spell the rebuilding of Gaza being tied to a crypto experiment.

— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) February 23, 2026

Stablecoin Support For Transactions

Supporters say a token could cut some friction. When cash runs low and banks are down, people cannot get what they need. A simple digital token held on phones could move value quickly between traders and charities.

It might also let international donors send help with fewer middlemen. There are questions about how to store the reserves, who would audit them, and what legal system would enforce payments. None of those issues has been solved.

Concerns About Control And Isolation

Critics warn of political and practical risks. Some worry that a special token for the strip could deepen separation from nearby markets and make coordination with the West Bank harder.

Others point to patchy internet access and the risk that a digital system could be shut down or manipulated during fighting. There is also debate over which institutions would hold the funds and who would be allowed to issue or burn tokens if things go wrong.

How It Would Work In Practice

Reports say the plan is still preliminary and that no issuing authority has been chosen. Proposals vary. One model uses a trusted third party outside the region to hold dollar reserves and run the ledger. Another relies on local partners to manage day-to-day distribution.

In both cases, safeguards have been suggested: independent audits, multi-party control of reserves, and strict rules for spending on essential goods only. These are ideas on paper more than firm plans.

Featured image from Crypto Valley Journal, chart from TradingView

Компания Bitdeer, крупнейшим в мире по вычислительной мощности оборудования майнер биткоинов, продала всю криптовалюту из своих запасов — объяснив необходимостью срочно получить деньги.

Crypto firm Terraform Labs’ wind-down administrator has sued Jane Street in Manhattan federal court, alleging the trading firm used material non-public information from Terraform insiders to trade around the May 2022 collapse of TerraUSD (UST) and Luna.

The complaint was filed by Todd R. Snyder, the administrator overseeing recoveries tied to Terraform’s bankruptcy wind-down. It names Jane Street entities and several individuals, including Bryce Pratt, and accuses the defendants of insider trading, fraud, and market manipulation tied to trading during the depeg crisis. The suit seeks damages and disgorgement, with any recovery intended to support creditor distributions.

Did Jane Street Cause The $40 Billion Crypto Crash?

A central part of the case is the role of Pratt, who allegedly moved from an internship at Terraform to a position at Jane Street while maintaining contact with Terraform personnel. The complaint claims he kept a confidential back channel with Terraform’s head of research and passed along sensitive information.

The filing quotes messages that, according to the plaintiff, show both the existence of confidential communications and an understanding that the information should not be shared. One message allegedly included the phrase “don’t share pls.” The complaint also claims Terraform personnel asked Pratt what Jane Street was discussing internally.

That point is critical to the plaintiff’s theory. The case is not framed as Jane Street simply trading aggressively during a volatile market event. It is framed as a claim that Jane Street had a private informational edge at a moment when the market was relying on public signals and deteriorating liquidity.

The lawsuit’s market narrative centers on the early phase of the UST depeg and liquidity movements on Curve. Snyder alleges that after Terraform adjusted liquidity in Curve’s 3pool, a Jane Street-linked 85 million UST trade hit the pool and became “the largest single swap on the Curve 3pool.”

The complaint goes further, alleging that this trade “precipitated a steep sell off in UST” and helped trigger the broader collapse of the Terra ecosystem. It also describes how conditions worsened over May 8 and 9, with UST trading volume surging and the token falling below $0.80 as Terraform attempted to defend the peg.

This sequence matters because the plaintiff is trying to connect alleged access to non-public information with a specific trading action and then link that action to damages suffered during the unwind.

The suit also cites direct communications during the meltdown. In one May 9 message referenced in the complaint, Pratt allegedly wrote to Do Kwon: “Hey Do Kwon, just wanted to express our interest in bidding on either BTC or LUNA.”

According to the filing, Kwon responded that “Bill from Jump” should have contacted Jane Street regarding a Terraform fundraise. The plaintiff uses that exchange to argue that Jane Street was not just an outside trading firm reacting to market prices, but was in direct communication with Terraform leadership while emergency options were being discussed.

Jane Street has pushed back on the allegations and is expected to contest the claims aggressively. As in other post-Terra litigation, key issues will likely include whether the information was truly material and non-public, whether the trades were causally connected to the collapse, and whether the plaintiff can prove intent.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.17 trillion.