源聚合

On-chain data shows Bitcoin buyers from 2025 and 2026 realized $1.5 billion in losses per day on the recent move down in the cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin Net Realised Profit/Loss Has Plunged Recently

In a new post on X, on-chain analyst Checkmate has talked about how loss-taking has looked during the latest Bitcoin price crash. The indicator cited by Checkmate is the “Net Realised Profit/Loss,” which measures the net amount of profit or loss that investors are realizing through their transactions.

The metric works by going through the transaction history of each coin being sold to see what price it was moved at prior to this. If the last selling price was greater than the latest spot price for any token, then that particular coin is now being moved at a net loss. On the other hand, the previous selling price being less suggests the sale is leading to profit realization.

In each case, the degree of profit/loss involved is equal to the difference between the two prices. The Net Realised Profit/Loss sums up this value for both types of sales and then finds their net value.

When the value of the indicator is greater than zero, it means the investors are selling their coins at a net profit. Similarly, it being negative implies loss-taking is the dominant mode of selling.

Now, here is the chart for the Ethereum Net Realised Profit/Loss shared by Checkmate that shows the trend in its 7-day exponential moving average (EMA) value separately for buyers from different years:

As displayed in the above graph, the Ethereum Net Realised Profit/Loss fell into the negative zone for the 2025 and 2026 buyers as the market crash took place. This suggests that buyers from the past year participated in loss realization.

“Class of 2025 and 2026 collectively puked out $1.5B/day in losses on the move lower, equivalent to the June 2022 low at $17.6k,” noted the analyst. Buyers from other years also participated in selling during the drawdown, but their distribution mostly involved profit-taking.

In related news, the unrealized loss in the market has also hit a value similar to that witnessed during the 2022 bear market, as on-chain analytics firm Glassnode has pointed out in an X post.

From the chart, it’s visible that the Relative Unrealized Loss, an indicator representing the unrealized Bitcoin loss as a percentage of the market cap, has risen to 16% recently. “Current market pain echoes a similar structure seen in early May 2022,” explained Glassnode.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $69,300, down more than 11% over the past week.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that progress on the long‑anticipated crypto market structure legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, appears to have stalled in Congress. 

His remarks come as lawmakers remain divided over key issues, most notably stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve’s proposal for so‑called “skinny” master accounts, a topic earlier highlighted by Crypto In America.

Stablecoin Yield Fight Fuels CLARITY Act Stalemate

Waller’s comments quickly drew reaction from market observers. Crypto analyst MartyParty noted on X that the governor’s assessment reflects the ongoing deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act.

According to MartyParty, the delay is not accidental. He argued that resistance from the banking sector has intensified, particularly around the treatment of stablecoin yields and rewards. 

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms such as exchanges and digital wallets should be allowed to offer interest‑like returns or incentives on stablecoins held by users.

Crypto industry advocates contend that yield‑bearing stablecoins encourage adoption, improve efficiency, and increase competition in the payments market. Banking groups, however, strongly oppose this view. 

They argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, warning that higher returns—often in the range of 3% to 5% or more, compared with near‑zero yields on many bank accounts—could trigger massive deposit outflows. 

In MartyParty’s assessment, banks are concerned that passage of the CLARITY Act could move trillions of dollars onto crypto‑based payment rails, breaking what he described as the banking sector’s “closed‑loop system” and putting pressure on long‑established profit models.

Crypto And Banks Head Back To White House  

Amid rising tensions, MartyParty also reported that the White House has scheduled a second meeting for Tuesday, February 10, aimed at easing friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over stablecoin yield payments. 

The meeting is expected to include senior policy officials rather than company chief executives, along with representatives from banking and crypto trade associations.

Another major point of contention is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account model. Under this framework, eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

The debate around skinny accounts became especially clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve. Crypto firms and industry groups generally expressed support, while banking organizations responded with caution or outright opposition. 

Banking groups raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many entities likely to qualify for payment accounts lack a long‑term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards. 

Governor Waller indicated that he hopes the Federal Reserve will be able to publish proposed regulations for skinny master accounts in the fourth quarter of this year.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com 

Bitcoin is struggling to hold the $70,000 level as the market shows clear signs of weakening demand following weeks of sustained selling pressure. After several failed recovery attempts, price action continues to reflect fragile sentiment, with liquidity thinning and volatility increasing. Investors remain cautious as macro uncertainty, declining risk appetite, and persistent outflows from speculative assets weigh on the broader crypto market.

A recent analysis from Axel Adler indicates that the bear market underway since November 2025 has entered a deeper phase following last Friday’s sharp decline, which pushed total drawdown to roughly 46% from the cycle peak. This magnitude of correction historically marks a transition from an early pullback into a more mature bearish stage, where sentiment typically deteriorates further before stabilization occurs.

The report highlights that Bitcoin has approached the 1.25× Realized Price Band, a historically significant level that often separates standard corrections from capitulation phases. When price tests this boundary, market structure tends to become highly sensitive to liquidity shifts and investor positioning.

Whether Bitcoin can hold above this zone will likely determine the short-term direction. A sustained breakdown could signal deeper capitulation dynamics, while stabilization may provide the foundation for eventual accumulation.

Bear Market Drawdown Signals Transition Into Deeper Phase

Adler notes that the Bitcoin Bear Market Correction Drawdowns chart places the current 2025–2026 decline in historical context, comparing its magnitude with previous bear cycles. The metric tracks percentage drawdowns from each cycle’s all-time high on a logarithmic scale, allowing a clearer assessment of structural market stress rather than nominal price moves alone.

The current bear phase began after Bitcoin topped near $124,450 in October 2025. By November, the market had entered a persistent downtrend, with the correction expanding from roughly −20% to −30% initially before accelerating to around −46% by early February. Notably, the pace intensified sharply: the drawdown moved from approximately −28% on January 28 to −46% by February 6. A modest rebound followed, with price briefly stabilizing near $70,700, still implying a drawdown of roughly −43%.

Historically, earlier cycles saw significantly deeper declines, including roughly −93% in 2011, around −83% in both the 2013–2015 and 2017–2018 bear markets, and about −76% during the 2021–2022 correction. Against that backdrop, the current decline appears less severe so far.

Adler argues that three months of persistent downside momentum signal entry into a deeper corrective phase. Stabilization between −40% and −50% would suggest moderating cycle volatility, while a drop beyond −50% could reopen downside targets toward the −60% to −70% range.

Bitcoin Tests Critical Support As Downtrend Pressure Intensifies

Bitcoin’s latest price action shows a clear deterioration in market structure after the sharp breakdown toward the $65K–$70K region. The chart highlights a decisive loss of short-term support, followed by an aggressive selloff that pushed price well below the key moving averages, signaling sustained bearish momentum rather than a simple correction.

Notably, BTC is trading under the 50-, 100-, and 200-period moving averages, all of which are beginning to slope downward. This alignment typically reflects a transition from consolidation into a more established downtrend. The rejection near the mid-$90K area earlier in the cycle appears to have confirmed a lower high, reinforcing bearish continuation risk.

Volume dynamics also deserve attention. The sharp spike during the most recent drop suggests forced selling, likely driven by liquidations and panic positioning. Historically, such spikes can either mark capitulation or precede further downside if follow-through selling emerges.

From a structural perspective, the $65K zone is now critical. Holding above it could allow stabilization and a potential relief bounce. However, a sustained breakdown below this level would likely expose the next demand region closer to the low-$60K range, where stronger historical support may emerge.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

After one of its sharpest swings in over a year, Bitcoin (BTC) is attempting to find balance. Prices have stabilized above $70,000 following a rapid drop to $60,000 last week, but the calm has done little to settle the broader debate; is this a completed reset, or just a pause before another move lower?

The recent volatility has flushed out leverage, forced large players to cut risk, and shifted sentiment from optimism to caution. While dip buyers have returned, on-chain data, derivatives metrics, and macro signals suggest the market remains in a fragile holding pattern rather than a clear recovery.

Whales Step Back as Leverage Unwinds

One of the clearest signs of the reset came from whale activity. On-chain data shows that the so-called Hyperunit whale sold more than $340 million in Bitcoin, sending the funds to Binance after months of aggressive, leveraged trading across crypto markets. The move followed a major liquidation on a large Ethereum position, which reportedly resulted in losses of roughly $250 million.

At its peak, the wallet held over $11 billion in Bitcoin. Holdings have since fallen to about $2.2 billion, signaling a shift away from expansion toward capital preservation.

The selling coincided with a broader decline in Bitcoin open interest, which fell from around $61 billion to near $49 billion, pointing to widespread deleveraging rather than fresh short positioning.

This reduction in leverage has eased immediate downside pressure but has also reduced momentum, leaving Bitcoin without strong directional conviction.

Bitcoin Price Stabilizes, But Signals Remain Mixed

Bitcoin was trading around $70,000–$71,000 in Asian hours on Monday, holding steady after last week’s rapid rebound. Technical indicators still show weak momentum, with subdued volume and no clear signs of either buyers or sellers being firmly in control.

Market participants are split. Some analysts argue that the recent washout has removed excess risk and created conditions for a healthier base. Others warn that similar rebounds in this cycle have turned into bull traps, especially when driven by short-term traders rather than long-term accumulation.

Support near $60,000 remains a key level to watch, while resistance between $73,000 and $75,000 is seen as a test for any sustained upside.

Macro, Sentiment, and Structural Questions

Beyond price action, broader factors are shaping the debate. Global equity markets rebounded, helping risk assets stabilize, while US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded modest inflows as investors selectively bought the dip.

At the same time, concerns around long-term narratives, from Bitcoin’s safe-haven role to emerging discussions about quantum computing risks, continue to hover in the background.

Bitcoin’s ability to hold above $70,000 suggests the forced reset may be largely complete. Whether that turns into a durable recovery or another leg lower will depend on liquidity, conviction from larger players, and how markets respond to upcoming macro data.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart on Tradingview

Bitcoin is struggling to reclaim the $70,000 level after several days of recovery from the recent $60,000 low, reflecting a market still searching for stability. The rebound offered temporary relief following intense selling pressure, yet momentum appears fragile as resistance continues to cap upside attempts. Volatility remains elevated, and sentiment has yet to fully recover from the sharp drawdown that pushed prices toward multi-month lows.

Amid this uncertain backdrop, fresh data indicate that the Binance SAFU Fund has purchased an additional 4,225 BTC, valued at roughly $299.6 million. The move comes at a time when broader market confidence remains subdued, immediately drawing attention from analysts tracking institutional positioning and liquidity dynamics. Historically, large strategic purchases during periods of weakness have sometimes preceded stabilization phases, although they do not guarantee an immediate reversal.

Market participants are now debating whether this accumulation reflects long-term confidence from major players or simply opportunistic positioning within an ongoing corrective cycle. While some analysts interpret the purchase as a constructive signal, others remain cautious, noting that macro conditions, exchange flows, and derivative positioning continue to exert pressure on price. For now, Bitcoin’s ability to sustain recovery above key resistance levels will likely determine whether this rebound evolves into a trend shift or remains a temporary bounce.

Institutional Accumulation Signals Amid Fragile Market Conditions

Data from Arkham indicates that Binance’s SAFU Fund has now accumulated a total of 10,455 BTC, worth roughly $734 million at current prices. This expansion of reserves is notable because it occurs during a period of persistent market fragility, when liquidity conditions remain tight, and investor sentiment is still recovering from recent drawdowns. Such activity from a major exchange-linked fund tends to attract attention, as it can reflect both strategic treasury management and broader confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term market structure.

From a market perspective, these purchases matter primarily due to their signaling effect rather than immediate supply impact. While the acquired volume represents only a fraction of circulating supply, institutional accumulation during corrective phases has historically coincided with stabilization periods, particularly when retail flows remain defensive.

However, this should not be interpreted automatically as a bullish catalyst. Exchange inflows, derivative positioning, and macroeconomic uncertainty continue to influence short-term price behavior.

Currently, the market remains in a transitional phase characterized by elevated volatility, cautious positioning, and selective accumulation. Large entities adding exposure while prices consolidate below key resistance levels can indicate long-term confidence, but confirmation typically requires improving liquidity conditions, declining exchange sell pressure, and stronger spot demand. Until those factors align, Bitcoin’s recovery remains tentative despite visible institutional participation.

Market Structure Weakens: Bitcoin Tests Long-Term Support Zones

Bitcoin’s weekly structure continues to show a fragile recovery attempt after the sharp breakdown that pushed price back below the $70,000 zone. The chart highlights a clear rejection from the region above $90,000 earlier in the cycle, followed by a sequence of lower highs and accelerated downside momentum. This pattern typically reflects distribution transitioning into a corrective phase rather than a simple pullback.

Price is currently trading beneath the short-term moving average cluster while approaching the longer-term trend support represented by the 200-week moving average area. Historically, this zone often acts as a structural support during deep corrections, but it does not guarantee an immediate reversal. Momentum indicators inferred from price behavior suggest sellers still dominate the order flow.

Volume dynamics reinforce this interpretation. The recent decline occurred alongside noticeable spikes in trading activity, indicating forced selling, liquidation cascades, or repositioning by large participants rather than passive drift lower.

If Bitcoin stabilizes above the mid-$60K region, consolidation could emerge before a new directional move. However, a sustained breakdown below that zone would likely open the door to deeper retracement levels, potentially testing prior accumulation areas formed earlier in the cycle.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

Japan’s snap election delivered a decisive mandate for Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, triggering an immediate rally across equities, foreign exchange, and crypto markets. The Nikkei 225 surged to record highs above 57,000, the yen weakened sharply, and Bitcoin briefly climbed past $72,000 during Asian trading hours.

Related Reading: Arthur Hayes Puts $100K On Hyperliquid (HYPE) Outrunning Every $1B+ Altcoin

At first glance, the reaction looked like a classic risk-on move driven by expectations of fiscal stimulus and policy continuity. But beneath the rebound, a different dynamic is taking shape, one that could tighten global liquidity and pressure risk assets in the near term.

Traders have dubbed the shift the “Takaichi trade,” a combination of aggressive fiscal expansion, tolerance for a weaker yen, and support for loose monetary conditions. While this mix has lifted Japanese stocks and exporters, analysts warn it is also reshaping cross-border capital flows in ways that may weigh on global markets.

Portfolio Rebalancing and Liquidity Tightening

According to analysis from CryptoQuant contributor XWIN Research Japan, the main risk does not stem from capital fleeing the United States outright. Instead, global investors are rebalancing portfolios as Japanese government bonds regain appeal after years of ultra-low yields.

Expectations of higher spending and reflation have pushed yields up, drawing capital back into domestic Japanese assets. This rotation has coincided with a pullback in U.S. equities.

Over the past week, major indices, including the Nasdaq and S&P 500, slipped into correction territory, reflecting tighter financial conditions and a reassessment of risk. As inflows into U.S. equity ETFs slow, marginal liquidity across global markets has declined, amplifying volatility.

Currency dynamics add another layer of pressure. Yen weakness, persistent U.S.–Japan rate differentials, and steady demand for dollars have increased funding costs for leveraged trades. Historically, such conditions tend to push investors to de-risk across multiple asset classes simultaneously.

Equity Weakness Spills Into Bitcoin

Bitcoin’s recent pullback fits this pattern. Despite briefly reclaiming levels above $70,000 after the election, analysts note that crypto markets remain closely linked to U.S. equities during risk-off phases. When stocks weaken, portfolio managers often trim crypto exposure simultaneously to manage overall volatility.

CryptoQuant data suggests the current softness in Bitcoin prices is driven less by on-chain deterioration and more by futures unwinds and leverage reduction. Open interest has declined, and forced liquidations earlier in the month cleared out crowded long positions, leaving traders more cautious about chasing rebounds.

From a longer-term perspective, Japan’s political stability could still support digital asset adoption. Takaichi’s supermajority gives her administration room to advance tax reforms, stablecoin regulations, and Web3 initiatives later in 2026.

Related Reading: Crypto Alert: 2 Victims Lose Over $60M In Address Poisoning Scam

For now, however, the market remains vulnerable to global risk cycles. As capital continues to adjust to Japan’s fiscal pivot and U.S. equities stay under pressure, short-term downside risks are likely to persist despite the post-election bounce.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Ripple has been slotted into the global top 10 of the most valuable private companies at an estimated $50 billion valuation, according to a widely shared “unicorn companies” table circulating on X.

The ranking matters because it reframes Ripple less as a single-token narrative and more as a scaled private-market franchise: a payments infrastructure firm that, at least in secondary valuation terms, is now being discussed in the same breath as the largest AI and fintech “super-unicorns.”

Ripple Ranks #9 Among World’s Largest Private Companies

The image that has been widely reposted on X presents a “List of unicorn companies” with Ripple highlighted at a $50 billion valuation. In that snapshot, Ripple appears alongside a cohort dominated by AI, fintech, and consumer platforms, including OpenAI ($500B), ByteDance ($480B), SpaceX ($400B), Anthropic ($350B), xAI ($230B), Databricks ($100B), Revolut ($75B), Stripe ($70B), and Shein ($66B).

A $50 billion tag implies a step-up from a $40 billion post-money valuation associated with a late-2025 equity financing. Taking those two marks at face value, the move to $50 billion represents roughly a 25% increase in implied enterprise value in a short window, an unusually sharp change for a late-stage private company unless secondary markets are repricing aggressively or a new transaction has reset expectations.

Ripple’s private valuation history has also been shaped by company-led liquidity events. The firm has previously conducted share repurchases that effectively created valuation reference points for employees and early investors, including buybacks at an implied $15 billion valuation in 2022 and $11.3 billion in early 2024. Against that backdrop, the late-2025 jump to $40 billion and the current $50 billion figure depict a company whose private-market value has been re-marked upward in distinct steps rather than through the continuous feedback loop of public markets.

That context also matters for how traders and allocators interpret the headline. Private valuations are not the same thing as liquid market prices, and they can reflect transaction structure, preferred terms, or limited float dynamics as much as broad investor consensus. Still, when a company starts appearing on top-10 private-company lists dominated by AI and mega-fintech, it signals that the market increasingly views it as an infrastructure-scale business rather than a niche crypto-adjacent story.

The valuation narrative is also colliding with IPO expectations and Ripple’s consistent stance that a listing is not imminent. With no near-term plan or timeline to go public, Ripple’s price discovery remains anchored to episodic financings and tender offers, meaning the next meaningful datapoint could come from another private round, a new buyback, or secondary transactions that leak into the market.

For crypto markets, the immediate implication isn’t a direct token catalyst so much as a reframing of Ripple’s corporate footprint. If the $50 billion valuation is true, it sets a higher bar for how investors model the company’s optionality: whether that’s future capital raising, M&A capacity, or leverage in institutional partnerships. If it doesn’t, the episode will still have demonstrated how quickly private-market narratives can harden into “consensus” once a single, shareable number hits the timeline.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.40.

The Bitcoin market shrugged, but the conversation about quantum computers and Bitcoin popped back into feeds this week. It’s an old worry that keeps coming up: could future machines break the cryptography that protects wallets?

Based on reports from CoinShares and comments from long-time Bitcoin voices, the real story is less about an immediate panic and more about practical planning and who would actually be at risk.

Public Keys Expose A Small Slice

Reports say that only 10,230 BTC sit in addresses where public keys are already visible, and that changes the math. Those coins would be the easiest targets if a powerful quantum machine appeared.

Around 7,000 BTC sit in mid-size wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 coins. About 3,230 BTC live in larger addresses holding between 1,000 and 10,000 coins.

At today’s values that stake is worth several hundred million dollars. That’s big money, but it’s not the same as a collapse of the protocol. An aggressive theft of that size would look like a heavy trade or a major security incident, not a network failure.

 

Quantum Hardware Still Falls Short

According to experts, the algorithmic threat is straightforward: Shor’s algorithm would attack elliptic-curve signatures and Grover’s algorithm would weaken SHA-256 hashing.

But reports note a huge gap between experiment and attack. Current machines run at a little over 100 qubits in experimental setups. An effective break would need millions of stable, error-corrected qubits.

That kind of hardware has not been built. In short: the math shows a possible route, but the engineering is far from ready.

Old Coins, The Real Operational Headache

Many of the more exposed addresses date back to Bitcoin’s early days and contain coins that have never moved. That makes them special. When those keys were first used, best practices were different.

Now, those same keys are a known point of weakness if quantum computing power ever arrives. Movement of those coins would be messy. Custodians, exchanges, and individual holders would all need to coordinate.

A technical fix could be proposed and adopted. The hard work would be getting people to update software and migrate keys before any real danger materializes. That is a logistics problem more than a cryptography puzzle.

Veteran Voices Call For Early Work

According to Andreas Antonopoulos, a well-known Bitcoin and cryptocurrency expert, the threat is real but distant; he urges preparation rather than alarm.

British cryptographer Adam Back has said planning can happen in an orderly way, and panic is unnecessary so long as steps start now.

Those views line up: upgrade paths should be designed, wallets must discourage key reuse, and the community should test migration procedures.

If action is taken early, there’s ample room to make the shift without rushing or breaking systems.

Featured image from Crypto Valley Journal, chart from TradingView

Even after reclaiming the $70,000 price level following a relief bounce, Bitcoin short-term investors remain bearish about the cryptocurrency’s trajectory in the near term. With the price of BTC facing downside pressure, these investors are reducing exposure by offloading their holdings.

Short-Term Holders Quietly Shed Bitcoin Holdings

Investors’ activity and sentiment are starting to flip as the Bitcoin price battles with the ongoing volatile market state, bringing it back to downside levels not seen since 2024. Given the persistent downward movement, the supply held by short-term BTC holders is declining, marking a shift in supply and market dynamics.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Short-Term Holders Deep In Loss: MVRV Signals Capitulation Phase

Alphractal, an advanced investment and on-chain data analytics platform, reported that changing sentiment among short-term holders after examining their Net Position Change and Supply. This pattern implies that weaker hands are lowering their exposure by either selling into the recent volatility or allowing longer-term investors to buy their coins.

Historically, a market moving from speculative to more conviction-driven behavior is reflected in a declining short-term holding supply. At the same time, it is evident from the 90-day net position change that new wallet addresses are not interested in building up to these levels.

This reinforces a market scenario where continuation is improbable absent a price or mood reset and suggests weak marginal demand. In the meantime, Alphractal highlighted that the on-chain data remains very clear. 

Alphractal noted in another post that the Bitcoin LTH/STH is declining. A drop in this metric implies that BTC transactions from long-term holders are becoming increasingly less profitable in comparison to those from short-term holders. On-chain behavior is repeating, and this pattern has been present in every previous bear market.

BTC Short-Term And Long-Term Holders Are Now Facing Pressure

These investors are still underwater as prices decline. In a recent research, Darkfost, an author at CryptoQuant, revealed that Bitcoin has put all the short-term holders under pressure and is now beginning to test long-term holders since the start of the correction. This change signifies a significant stage in the market structure, where sustained pressure may either confirm long-term holding resistance or compel wider capitulation.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Market Calm As Long-Term Holder Sell-Side Activity Dries Up, Bullish Phase Returning?

With a cost basis of  $103,188 and $85,849, the expert stated that the first long-term holder cohorts, particularly holders between 6m and 12m, and 12m and 18m holders, are already under pressure. However, the price of Bitcoin has reacted after hitting the realized price of older holders (those holding between 18m and 2 years), which is currently positioned at $63,654.

According to Darkfost, this level seems to be an area of interest to these holders, but this is not what is displayed exactly on the chart. The fact that their cost basis has been in an upward trend suggests that more holders have been keeping their coins longer. As the correction evolves, the reaction of long-term holders may play a critical role in determining the next possible direction for the flagship cryptocurrency asset.

XRP’s efforts to regain upward momentum following last week’s sharp decline have so far stalled, with $1.50 now rising as the most important price level. 

A new technical analysis shared by crypto analyst Tara points to Bitcoin’s unfinished price structure as the main reason why XRP’s price action is still stuck below $1.5, with the leading cryptocurrency’s next moves likely to determine whether the altcoin can recover or sink further in the days ahead.

XRP Hits Resistance, Bitcoin’s Structure Remains Incomplete

As the largest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin is known for strongly influencing how other large market-cap cryptocurrencies like XRP move. Interestingly, technical analysis of the altcoin’s price action on the daily candlestick price chart done by crypto analyst Tara links the two cryptos, and the outlook of XRP depends on how the Bitcoin price moves from here.

Expert Says If You Hold XRP, Pay Attention To These Things XRP has already completed a move into its textbook 0.382 Fibonacci resistance, which is sitting around $1.53. As shown on the daily candlestick price chart below, the token filled the liquidity zone around the October 10 flash crash low before bouncing at $1.15. However, this bounce was subsequently rejected at $1.53. The rejection from that region shows that the altcoin’s bulls have done their part technically, but the required follow-through is missing.

The reason, according to the analysis, lies with Bitcoin. The waves on Bitcoin’s chart are still developing, meaning the entire crypto market has not reached a resolution. As it stands, Bitcoin is currently in an unfinished corrective phase, and many analysts are projecting more lows. This has led to cautious capital inflows across the market. As a result, XRP is struggling to attract sustained buying pressure even after reaching important technical milestones on its own chart.

Short-Term Bitcoin Corrections Could Drag It Lower

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $69,800. The outlook by Tara is that Bitcoin will undergo a corrective move to the $65,800 region before making another push higher toward its 0.5 resistance around $75,400. This type of pullback and continuation scenario has implications for XRP’s price action.

If Bitcoin does correct as expected, the altcoin could be pulled back toward the $1.30 area, which is highlighted as short-term support. The continuation wave up by Bitcoin is then expected to take it as high as the 0.5 Fib at $1.65.

The more bearish scenario outlined in the analysis will occur if Bitcoin fails to hold higher support levels and instead breaks down to $52,200. Such a move would likely trigger a much deeper reaction across altcoins, because it would mandate Bitcoin breaking below its recent $62,800 low on February 5. In that case, the altcoin could be drawn down to its 0.786 Fibonacci support, which is currently sitting at $0.87.

Rumors of a possible US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation into Binance have resurfaced long‑running questions about the October 10, 2025 liquidation event, the largest market wipeout in crypto history. 

October 10 Crash Back In Focus

For context, during the October 10 event, roughly $19 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated, with $3.21 billion erased in a single minute. Around 1.6 million traders were forced out of their positions as Bitcoin plunged from about $122,000 to $104,000.

Speculation around Binance’s role in the crash has intensified following a post on X (previously Twitter) by market expert Hugo Crypto. In his message, he cautioned that he could not independently confirm reports of an SEC probe into Binance, stressing that the claim remains a rumor. 

However, he argued that the broader story surrounding the October 10 collapse warrants serious attention regardless of whether a formal investigation is underway.

Since the crash, a series of developments has kept Binance under scrutiny. Shortly after the event in October 2025, the exchange attributed the turmoil to a broader macroeconomic shock and denied responsibility, later paying about $283 million in compensation. 

In January 2026, Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood stated during an appearance on Fox Business that a “Binance software glitch” was responsible for triggering the crash. 

Later that month, OKX CEO Star Xu publicly accused Binance of engaging in “irresponsible marketing campaigns,” further escalating tensions between major exchanges.

In early February, Binance reportedly sent cease‑and‑desist letters to X users who were speculating about the exchange’s solvency. Now, fresh rumors suggesting potential SEC involvement have added a new layer of uncertainty, even though no official confirmation has been made.

Binance Denies Responsibility

Regardless of whether the SEC is actively investigating, some former regulators argue that the October 10 crash itself demands a thorough review. 

Salman Banaei, a former official at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has compared the incident to the 2010 Flash Crash in traditional markets, saying it merits a similarly rigorous investigation.

The exchange’s leadership, however, continues to reject claims that the exchange caused the market collapse. At the end of January, former CEO Changpeng Zhao publicly dismissed accusations that Binance was responsible for the October 2025 crash. 

Zhao addressed claims that technical issues and pricing discrepancies on Binance triggered the record‑breaking liquidations. He emphasized that, following the crash, the platform offered approximately $600 million in compensation to affected users and businesses. 

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

A recent major Ethereum sell-off is sharply taking over the spotlight in the broader cryptocurrency community. Given the prolonged volatile state of the market over the past few months, Trend Research has officially concluded its massive ETH unwinding, offloading thousands of the leading altcoin.

Massive Trend Research’s Ethereum Unwind Concludes

Ethereum’s price is facing heightened bearish pressure, and several big institutions appear to be dumping their ETH holdings, which is likely to extend the ongoing volatility. The most recent and popular sell-off swelling across the community is that of Trend Research, an Edmonton-based marketing research data collection firm.

Trend Research is marking a significant turning point for Ethereum, with the announcement that the protracted tale of strong selling and position unwinding has finally ended. MartyParty, a crypto commentator and the host of The Office Space, shared this update on the X platform, attracting community attention.

Looking at the on-chain tracking, the company has deposited/liquidated the entire 651,757 ETH into Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. At the time of the transaction, the portion of ETH was valued at a whopping $1.34 billion, with a reported average exit price of $2,055.

According to MartyParty, this caps off a brutal leveraged long position that began unraveling hard when the price of Ethereum experienced a sharp decline. Specifically, the forced selling began at levels of $1,750 earlier in February 2026. After the sell-off, the estimated realized loss clocks in at roughly $747 million, while other trackers estimate it at roughly $745 million, marking one of the biggest public sales from a major player in recent memory. 

MartyParty has outlined a breakdown of the action. The commentator highlighted that Trend Research originally built a huge ETH long. This was carried out by borrowing stables on Aave against ETH collateral, then buying more ETH exposure that reportedly peaked near +$2 billion at points.

As the price of Ethereum tanked, the company started moving ETH into Binance in the past days/weeks to repay debt and prevent complete liquidation. Prior batches ranged from 10,000 to 90,000 ETH, and they are increasing. Meanwhile, the final batch removed the rest, basically leaving their wallets empty. However, a few trackers point to tiny remnants like 0.165 ETH left in their wallet.

By making this move, a significant source of sell pressure that had been looming over cryptocurrency for the last week or so is eliminated. However, whether it triggers a relief bounce or if the market simply ignores it hinges on the broader crypto sentiment, including macro, other whales, and ETF flows, among others.

ETH Whales Reviving Buying Pressure

Even with the ongoing pullback, investors’ sentiment has not entirely turned bearish toward the altcoin. CW, a market expert, disclosed that inflows to accumulating wallet addresses seem to have increased despite ETH experiencing a notable drop.

Data shows that large holders or whales have been increasing their holdings, while retail investors continue to offload due to the panic. This divergence represents a shift in ownership, where supply moves from weaker hands to stronger conviction-driven investors.

Quick Facts:

• Cango’s $305M Bitcoin sell-off tested market liquidity, but strong absorption indicates the broader bull trend remains intact.
• Capital is rotating from large-cap consolidation into high-beta assets, favoring projects with strong community narratives.
• Maxi Doge utilizes a unique ‘Leverage King’ culture and trading competitions to capture the aggressive sentiment of retail traders.

Bitcoin just took a $305M hit.

The market faced a serious stress test this week following confirmed reports that Cango offloaded approximately $305M worth of Bitcoin ($BTC). This massive liquidity event, executed over a series of high-volume transactions, momentarily shook confidence in the asset’s short-term price floor.

Usually, when a corporate entity or large holder liquidates a position of that size, it signals profit-taking at local tops, or a desperate need for cash, forcing the spot market to swallow hard.

But the reaction highlights a maturing ecosystem. While the sell-off triggered a flinch, support levels held surprisingly firm, suggesting that institutional demand is quietly absorbing the supply shock. That matters. It indicates the current bull market structure remains intact despite heavy distribution from legacy holders. Analysts are calling it a ‘capital rotation’: as Bitcoin stabilizes post-Cango, risk appetite isn’t vanishing, it’s just sliding down the risk curve.

Smart money appears to be pivoting away from the saturated large-cap trade toward high-beta assets that offer asymmetric upside. In this environment, liquidity flows where the narrative is loud. That rotation is showing up clearly in Maxi Doge ($MAXI), a new project blending meme culture with high-leverage trading utility. It’s cooking, even as the broader market digests that $305M Bitcoin overhang.

Retail Traders Pivot to High-Leverage Narratives

The divergence between Bitcoin’s choppy consolidation and the explosive interest in newer assets suggests a shift in trader psychology. Retail participants, priced out of life-changing multiples on $BTC, are hunting protocols that align with the aggressive ‘grindset’ of the current cycle. Maxi Doge has emerged as a focal point here. Unlike standard meme tokens that rely solely on passive ‘HODLing,’ Maxi Doge markets itself as a canine juggernaut embodying the 1000x leverage mentality.

The project’s architecture targets a specific niche: the lack of community-driven events for high-frequency traders. Through its ‘Leverage King Culture,’ the project plans to introduce Holder-Only Trading Competitions where participants vie for leaderboard rewards. It effectively turns the stress of market volatility into a community sport.

Plus, the Maxi Fund treasury aims to ensure that a portion of the ecosystem’s value flows back into liquidity provision and strategic partnerships, creating a fundamental floor for the token’s economy. This blend of viral gym-bro humor, ‘never skip leg-day, never skip a pump,’ and tangible utility through trading contests positions it to potentially outperform legacy meme coins like the original Dogecoin.

For traders tired of sideways price action, the Maxi Doge ecosystem offers high-octane engagement.

CHECK OUT THE $MAXI ACTION

Whale Accumulation Signals Confidence in Maxi Doge Protocol

While headlines obsess over Cango selling Bitcoin, on-chain data reveals a quieter, yet aggressive accumulation trend happening within the Maxi Doge presale. Smart money is moving. Etherscan data reveals high-net-worth wallets scooping up six-figure purchases, the largest at $314K. An entry of that magnitude during a presale phase is statistically significant; it suggests sophisticated actors are positioning themselves before the token hits public exchanges.

The financial metrics back up this bullish thesis. $MAXI has raised over $4.5M with tokens currently priced at $0.0002803. That level of capital commitment indicates the market sees value in the project’s dual approach of meme-first marketing and serious DeFi mechanics.

Beyond the buy pressure, the protocol incentivizes long-term holding through dynamic staking APY (currently at 68%). A 5% allocation of the total supply is aimed to be dedicated to a staking pool that distributes rewards daily for up to one year, encouraging investors to lock supply and reduce circulating volatility.

With the smart contract governing supply on the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake network, the technical foundation is robust. As Cango’s Bitcoin sales fade into the rearview, the smart money seems to have already found its next target.

BUY YOUR $MAXI HERE

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and projects in presale carry inherent risks. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Биткоин к концу года достигнет $150 000, а нынешняя коррекция представляет собой самый слабый медвежий цикл за всю историю первой криптовалюты, настаивают аналитики инвестиционной компании Bernstein.

Quick Facts:

• Capital is shifting from speculative assets to ‘pick and shovel’ plays, specifically Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions that unlock $BTC liquidity.
• Bitcoin Hyper solves the scalability trilemma by integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), offering sub-second speeds on Bitcoin.
• The project has raised over $31M in its presale, signaling robust market validation for its modular architecture.

The current market cycle is defined by a distinct rotation: capital is moving from speculative assets into critical infrastructure. While meme coins dominate social media volume, on-chain data reveals that ‘smart money’ is increasingly positioning itself in the rails that will carry the next generation of decentralized finance (DeFi).

Bitcoin remains the undisputed king of crypto, but let’s be honest, its utility has historically been capped by technical limitations. The network is secure, yes, but slow. While the Lightning Network attempted to solve payments, the broader issue of programmability remains. Institutions are watching this gap. Unlocking even 1% of Bitcoin’s dormant capital for decentralized applications represents a trillion-dollar opportunity.

The future isn’t about whether Bitcoin will recover and how high it climbs again. It’s about turning it from a place where Bitcoin isn’t just a store of value, but the settlement layer for a bustling ecosystem of high-speed applications. This structural shift is directing liquidity toward Layer 2 solutions that promise to modernize the network without compromising security.

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is capitalizing on this demand, effectively merging the speed of Solana with the security of Bitcoin. This makes it one of the best crypto to buy.

Solving The Scalability Trilemma With SVM Integration

The main driver here is the ‘Scalability Trilemma,’ the challenge of achieving speed, security, and decentralization all at once. Most Bitcoin layers sacrifice performance for security. The result? Sluggish user experiences that fail to retain retail users. Bitcoin Hyper addresses this by integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly into a Bitcoin Layer 2 framework.

That matters because the SVM is currently the gold standard for high-throughput execution. By using this architecture, Bitcoin Hyper delivers sub-second finality and negligible transaction fees, a stark contrast to the costly execution found on traditional Ethereum-based L2s or the mainnet itself. It’s not just a technical upgrade; it’s a user experience revolution.

It lets developers build complex dApps, such as high-frequency trading platforms and interactive gaming, using Bitcoin’s robust liquidity as the settlement layer.

From a development perspective, this modular approach, using Bitcoin L1 for settlement and a real-time SVM L2 for execution, lowers the barrier to entry. Developers can use Rust to build applications that feel as fast as Solana but settle on the world’s most secure blockchain. Plus, the decentralized Canonical Bridge reduces friction, allowing for seamless $BTC transfers. Want a full project play-by-play? Check out our ‘What is Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER)?‘ guide.

For investors, the value proposition is clear: infrastructure that eliminates bottlenecks captures value.

EXPLORE THE $HYPER ECOSYSTEM

Smart Money Flows Favor Early-Stage Infrastructure

Technical architecture provides the thesis, but on-chain flows provide the timing. Traders often look for divergences between price action and capital accumulation. In the case of Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the funding data indicates significant demand for this infrastructure-focused approach.

$HYPER has already raised over $31M. That figure underscores strong conviction from early backers. With tokens currently priced at $0.0136753, the entry point reflects an early valuation relative to established Layer 2 competitors like Stacks. The sheer volume suggests the market is validating the ‘SVM on Bitcoin’ thesis before the mainnet is fully saturated.

Crucially, high-net-worth individuals are already taking positions. Smart money is moving. Etherscan data shows that during the presale, whales have bought up over $1M, with the largest purchase totalling $500K. Whale accumulation during a presale phase is a notable signal; it implies that sophisticated actors are locking in supply, anticipating a supply shock post-TGE.

Plus, the protocol’s decision to offer high APY staking immediately after the Token Generation Event (TGE), with a short 7-day vesting period for presale stakers, incentivizes long-term holding over short-term flipping.

$HYPER isn’t competing with $BTC; it’s lifting it up to what it can be, maximizing its potential.

BUY YOUR $HYPER FROM THE OFFICIAL PRESALE PAGE

The content provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and presale investments carry inherent risks. Always perform your own due diligence before investing.

Bitcoin (BTC), the world’s largest cryptocurrency, is set to debut on Ripple’s blockchain XRP Ledger (XRPL) this month. Analysts have taken to social media to explain what this milestone really means, highlighting how it automatically expands XRPL’s institutional use case and positions it as a leading network in the crypto space. 

Ripple’s XRP Ledger Prepares To Tokenize Bitcoin

XRP is starting the week in the spotlight, after crypto market expert Ripple Bull Winkle and other analysts unveiled an upcoming development in the XRP Ledger. According to Ripple Bull Winkle, XRPL is gearing up to tokenize Bitcoin by the end of February 2026. 

While many in the crypto community question the validity of this announcement, others wonder what this truly means for XRP and its value. In response, Ripple Bull Winkle explained that Ripple Custody, a bank-grade digital asset management service, will hold the real BTC in secure storage and issue tokenized versions of it on the XRP Ledger. For every Bitcoin they hold, they would mint or create an equivalent amount of tokenized Bitcoin, which can be easily transferred across the network. 

Notably, tokenizing Bitcoin does not mean that the cryptocurrency is moving to a new blockchain. Rather, it means that a version of the digital asset will exist and be usable on XRPL as a token that represents the underlying BTC. Ripple Bull Winkle explained that, because the XRP Ledger is much faster than the Bitcoin network, transactions would be settled in about 3-4 seconds instead of 10 minutes. The analyst emphasized that fees would also become cheaper, costing only pennies.

After Bitcoin, Ripple intends to expand its asset tokenization to other cryptocurrencies. Ripple Bull Winkle has stated that it plans to tokenize leading assets like Ethereum and Solana on XRPL, meaning versions of those assets will also be usable on the network. If this happens, the XRP Ledger would not be limited to XRP. Ripple Bull Winkle noted that it would become a universal settlement layer, where many digital assets can move quickly and more affordably. 

Stablecoins Could Be Next 

In a similar post, crypto expert Vincent Van Code discussed Bitcoin’s upcoming tokenization on the XRP Ledger. He addressed whether this feature could later be expanded to include fiat currencies and stablecoins, noting that the main challenge is custody. As an example, the analyst explained that if Ripple wanted to mint RLJPY, a Japanese Yen-pegged stablecoin, a regulated bank would need to hold the actual Yen on investors’ behalf. 

He noted that this process is more complex than it appears, especially when dealing with large amounts, such as $100 million. He also raised concerns about fees, explaining that a stablecoin business model often needs cash-based investments to remain profitable. Despite these challenges, Van Codes still believes XRPL could eventually be used to mint not only stablecoins, but also tokenize gold and diamonds.

Quick Facts:

• Vitalik Buterin challenges DeFi to move away from centralized stablecoins ($USDC/$USDT) toward automated, decentralized models to reduce systemic risk.
• The computational requirements for these ‘sovereign’ stablecoins favor high-throughput environments like the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) over congested legacy networks.
• Bitcoin Hyper combines Bitcoin’s settlement security with SVM speed, raising over $31M to build the infrastructure needed for next-gen DeFi.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin just threw a wrench into the comfortable consensus of decentralized finance (DeFi). His target? The sector’s massive reliance on centralized stablecoins like $USDC and Tether. In recent commentary regarding the future of on-chain stability, Buterin argued that the industry’s heavy dependence on asset-backed models introduces a single point of failure that contradicts the core ethos of crypto.

Instead, he advocates for ‘automated’ or algorithmic alternatives, mechanisms that maintain pegs through math and game theory rather than bank deposits.

That pivot matters. It signals a shift in how institutional capital views DeFi risk. The current model is efficient but fragile. Buterin’s proposed ‘governance-minimized’ future is resilient, sure, but it demands immense computational throughput to manage real-time liquidations and stability mechanisms. Right now, Ethereum struggles to support high-frequency algorithmic stability without pricing out users during volatility spikes. This suggests that the bottleneck for true DeFi innovation isn’t liquidity, but execution speed.

While the market digests what moving away from centralized reliance actually looks like, smart money is quietly rotating. They’re hunting for infrastructure capable of supporting this high-computational future. The focus isn’t just scaling transaction counts; it’s about fundamentally altering execution environments. Leading the pack? Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER). It’s building the rails for this next generation of decentralized finance by merging Bitcoin’s security with the Solana Virtual Machine’s (SVM) speed.

Bitcoin Hyper Integrates SVM to Solve The ‘Trilemma’ of Scalable DeFi

While Ethereum developers debate theoretical frameworks, the necessary infrastructure is being built elsewhere. Bitcoin Hyper has staked its claim as a first-mover in the ‘Bitcoin Renaissance,’ planning to deploy a Layer 2 architecture that directly addresses the latency issues plaguing complex DeFi applications.

By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), the protocol delivers transaction speeds that ostensibly outpace Solana itself. And the kicker? It does this while anchoring finality to the Bitcoin network.

That architecture is critical for the ‘alternative models’ Buterin envisions. Algorithmic stablecoins and complex derivatives require sub-second state updates to prevent de-pegging events, a speed that the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) often fails to deliver under load. Bitcoin Hyper’s modular approach separates the execution layer (SVM) from the settlement layer (Bitcoin), allowing for high-frequency trading and lending protocols to operate with low costs.

Using a decentralized Canonical Bridge, the project ensures that while execution is rapid, the underlying asset security remains tied to Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus. This mix of ‘Rust-based programmability’ and ‘Bitcoin hardness’ allows developers to build the sovereign financial tools Buterin describes, but on the world’s most secure blockchain rather than a congested general-purpose network.

EXPLORE THE $HYPER PRESALE

Whales Gather as Presale Capital Surges Past $31M

The market’s appetite for high-performance Bitcoin infrastructure is showing up in the capital flows surrounding Bitcoin Hyper’s early stages. Check the official presale page, and you’ll see the project has successfully raised over $31M. That figure underscores significant demand for Layer 2 solutions that go beyond simple payment channels. With tokens currently priced at $0.0136753, the valuation offers an interesting entry point relative to established L2s like Stacks or Optimism.

Deep-pocketed investors (whales) appear to be positioning themselves ahead of the token generation event (TGE). There have been multiple six-figure purchases throughout the presale, the largest hitting $500K. Now this doesn’t mean success, but it does show smart money sees potential and that’s reassuring.

This accumulation pattern often precedes broader retail interest, particularly when technical catalysts, such as the launch of mainnet staking with high APY incentives, are on the horizon. Bitcoin Hyper confirmed a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers, a mechanism designed to mitigate post-launch volatility while rewarding long-term participants.

If you’re tracking ‘smart money,’ the combination of massive presale volume and specific whale entries suggests a market segment betting heavily on the convergence of Bitcoin security and SVM speed.

GET YOUR $HYPER HERE

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile; invest only what you can afford to lose.

Quick Facts:

• Bithumb successfully recovered 99.7% of an erroneous Bitcoin airdrop, highlighting the reversibility of centralized exchange errors versus on-chain finality.
• The incident underscores the operational risks of legacy crypto infrastructure, driving demand for automated, protocol-level security solutions.
• BMIC addresses the looming ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ threat with a quantum-secure finance stack and Zero Public-Key Exposure.
• Early traction is visible in the presale, with over $444K raised as investors hedge against future cryptographic vulnerabilities.

The fragility of centralized exchange operations was on full display recently. South Korean giant Bithumb confirmed the recovery of 99.7% of funds from an erroneous Bitcoin airdrop event, a messy situation, to put it mildly. The incident, caused by an internal system calibration error, triggered a scramble that highlights the classic paradox of centralized custody: the ability to correct mistakes versus the risk of human error.

The remaining 0.3% has been repaid using company assets.

While the recovery rate is technically impressive, the event has reignited the ‘not your keys, not your coins’ debate. Bithumb’s ability to claw back funds relied heavily on user compliance and freezing internal ledger movements, luxuries that simply don’t exist in a truly decentralized environment. If this error had occurred on-chain with finalized settlement? Those funds would be gone forever.

This near-miss acts as a serious stress test for the industry. It reminds institutional players (and retail traders watching the charts) that legacy infrastructure remains prone to operational friction, even when wrapped in crypto branding. As the market matures, the focus is shifting from simply fixing mistakes post-mortem to preventing catastrophic loss at the protocol level.

This shift from reactive recovery to proactive immunity is driving capital toward next-gen infrastructure. While exchanges patch operational holes, traders are watching BMIC ($BMIC), a protocol designed to secure the transaction layer itself against the looming threat of quantum computing.

BMIC Offers Quantum-Proof Protection For Your Crypto

The Bithumb incident was a failure of process; the next major crisis in crypto will likely be a failure of mathematics. Current blockchain security relies on elliptic curve cryptography, a standard that quantum computers are projected to break within the decade. This creates a ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ threat vector. Malicious actors are collecting encrypted data today to unlock it once quantum processing power matures.

BMIC acts as the firewall against this existential risk. By deploying a Full Quantum-Secure Finance Stack, the project moves beyond standard wallet security. It uses post-quantum cryptography combined with AI-Enhanced Threat Detection to ensure that wallet integrity remains absolute, even in a post-quantum environment.

What differentiates BMIC from standard security patches is its implementation of Zero Public-Key Exposure. In traditional transactions, your public key is revealed. That creates a potential attack surface for quantum algorithms (like Shor’s algorithm) to derive the private key. BMIC fixes this by keeping keys shrouded. Even if the network is under quantum surveillance, the user’s assets remain mathematically invisible to attackers.

This isn’t just about better hygiene; it’s a fundamental architectural shift. The protocol also uses ERC-4337 Smart Accounts, abstracting away the complexities of seed phrases while maintaining quantum resistance. For enterprises watching the Bithumb debacle, the appeal of BMIC lies in its promise of finality without the fear of cryptographic obsolescence.

CHECK OUT THE QUANTUM STACK AIMING TO FUTURE-PROOF YOUR ASSETS

Smart Money Targets $BMIC Presale as Institutional Hedge

While headlines focus on exchange recoveries and Bitcoin price action, on-chain data suggests a quiet rotation into infrastructure plays offering long-term durability. The BMIC presale has already attracted notice, raising over $444K in its early stages. Sophisticated investors seem to be looking beyond current market volatility, hedging against future technological risks.

At the current price of $0.049474, the token acts as a call option on the security standards of the next decade. The market logic here is straightforward: as the value of assets stored on-chain grows into the trillions, the premium placed on quantum-proof security will likely expand exponentially. Current wallets are like vaults with time locks ticking down; BMIC provides the upgrade required to keep them shut.

The protocol’s utility extends into governance and compute. The ‘Burn-to-Compute’ mechanism and the Quantum Meta-Cloud suggest a broader ecosystem play. Here, the token isn’t just a governance instrument; it’s a resource for accessing high-level security computation. This dual utility (security infrastructure plus compute resources) positions $BMIC favorably against single-purpose security tokens, and makes it one of the next crypto to explode.

For investors, the Bithumb error is a signal. Centralized entities can fix human mistakes, but they can’t fix broken cryptography. As the industry realizes that legacy wallets are living on borrowed time, capital is likely to flow toward protocols that have already solved the quantum dilemma.

GET YOUR $BMIC HERE

The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry high risks, including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own due diligence before investing.

Quick Facts:

• South Korea’s FSS is actively using new digital monitoring tools to identify and penalize whale manipulation and unfair trading practices on major exchanges.
• While regulators fight external manipulation, SUBBD Token uses immutable smart contracts to ensure internal economic fairness for content creators and fans.
• $SUBBD disrupts the $85B creator economy by offering AI voice cloning and automated tools, reducing reliance on high-fee Web2 platforms.
• With over $1.47M raised and a 20% staking APY, the market is showing strong early support for SUBBD’s transparent SocialFi model.

South Korean regulators are finally tightening the net. The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has launched an intensive probe into ‘unfair trading practices,’ specifically targeting whale activity that distorts prices on giants like Upbit and Bithumb. Using new powers from the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the FSS is deploying a dedicated system to hunt down abnormal patterns, think wash trading and spoofing, that have plagued the peninsula’s high-volume market for years.

It’s a pivotal shift in global compliance. By scrutinizing large-scale wallet movements, the FSS aims to dismantle ‘kimchi premium’ exploitation and restore confidence. They’ve already flagged several suspicious cases, signaling that the era of unchecked whale dominance in Seoul is coming to a close.

But while regulators try to force fairness through punishment, a new wave of protocols is engineering it directly into the code. Capital is rotating toward projects prioritizing transparent tokenomics over opaque order books. Leading this shift in the content economy is SUBBD Token ($SUBBD), a project using Ethereum’s ledger to dismantle the predatory fee structures of Web2.

SUBBD Token Disrupts the $85B Content Industry Through Decentralized Transparency

While the FSS fights market manipulation, SUBBD Token tackles economic manipulation in the creator economy. Centralized intermediaries currently dominate the landscape, often extracting up to 70% of creator revenue. Frankly, the economics are brutal. $SUBBD merges Web3 architecture with advanced AI to create a permissionless ecosystem. Value flows directly from fan to creator, no opaque algorithms dictating who gets seen.

The platform rests on Ethereum-based EVM-compatible smart contracts. That means every transaction, from subscriptions to tips, is verifiable on-chain, eliminating the ‘black box’ accounting typical of Web2 streaming. Beyond simple payments, SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) integrates proprietary AI models for content generation and voice cloning. This lets creators scale their output without relying on fragmented, expensive tools.

By tokenizing access, $SUBBD introduces a ‘HoneyHive’ governance model. Holders don’t just speculate; they vote on creator onboarding and platform themes. It shifts power from boardrooms to the community, mirroring the very transparency South Korean regulators are trying to impose on exchanges.

EXPLORE THE $SUBBD ECOSYSTEM

Smart Money Flows Into SUBBD Presale As Staking APY Hits 20%

You can see the market’s appetite for utility in the inflows. SUBBD Token has successfully raised over $1.4M, with the token currently priced at $0.057495. This steady accumulation suggests investors are positioning themselves early in a narrative combining two high-growth sectors: Artificial Intelligence and SocialFi.

Traders are particularly focused on the staking incentives, which are designed to prevent the exact type of ‘pump-and-dump’ volatility the FSS is investigating. SUBBD Token offers a fixed 20% APY for the first year to users who lock their tokens. This mechanism encourages long-term holding over short-term flipping, stabilizing the token’s velocity. Plus, staking grants access to benefits like ‘daily BTS drops’ and XP multipliers.

The integration of AI-driven revenue streams creates a sustainable demand loop. As creators use the AI Personal Assistant, $SUBBD functions as the essential utility currency. For retail participants, the presale represents an entry point into an $85B industry disruption before the token hits public exchanges, where liquidity and volatility usually increase.

GET YOUR $SUBBD NOW FOR $0.057495

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks, including high volatility and potential loss of capital. Always conduct your own due diligence before participating in any presale.

Following the launch of Ripple’s US dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD, many in the crypto space believed that it could negatively impact the XRP price or replace the altcoin. However, new reports from a crypto analyst suggest that RLUSD and XRP actually work together to support each other. He also indicated that the stablecoin could be a major reason XRP could rally again.  

Ripple’s RLUSD To Become Catalyst For An XRP Price Rally

The introduction of RLUSD in 2024 saw mixed reactions from many in the XRP community. While XRP presents a more volatile and speculative digital asset, RLUSD brings stability and reliability. Market analyst Xaif Crypto has explained how this stability, as well as other functions of the Ripple stablecoin, can benefit XRP. 

In his post on X, the analyst noted that RLUSD creates a powerful demand engine that could eventually support a price rally for XRP. He shared an image outlining several ways this could happen. According to Xaif Crypto, as a stable asset, RLUSD eliminates transactional volatility, making it easier for investors to purchase XRP in large amounts. He explained that, rather than regulated banks or institutions relying on fiat to buy XRP, they could use RLUSD, thereby making it a preferred trading and settlement medium for XRP. 

Xaif Crypto also explained how RLUSD could fuel significant price movements in XRP by “clearing the order book.” He noted that banks and financial institutions could use the high-liquidity stablecoin to place large buy orders for XRP on crypto exchanges. As these orders are filled, cheaper XRP sell orders are quickly purchased, depleting liquidity and supply at lower price levels. Once these sell orders are gone, buyers must pay higher prices, potentially fueling an XRP rally as institutional demand grows. 

Furthermore, Xaif Crypto highlighted a “feedback loop” that could support a sustained price growth for XRP. He noted that RLUSD enables large transactions to occur faster and more efficiently than traditional fiat trading pairs such as USD/XRP. As the XRP price rises, institutions may continue using the cryptocurrency due to its speed and cost advantages for payments and settlements, creating ongoing demand that could further reinforce upward price movement. 

How This Theory Works In Reality

Xaif Crypto has outlined a real-world scenario, showing how RLUSD could fuel an XRP price rally. In the example, a bank deposits $1 billion into RLUSD, which is held in a Ripple-supported wallet or exchange and is ready for use. The bank then uses the RLUSD to buy XRP on an exchange. 

The XRP order book is assumed to be:

• 100,000 XRP at $0.50
• 50,000 XRP at $1.00
• 20,000 XRP at $5

The bank’s $1 billion purchase then clears the order books in stages:

• Buys all the $0.50 orders
• Buys all the $1.00 orders
• Starts buying into the $5.00 range.  

Following the large-scale RLUSD purchase, XRP’s price jumps sharply to $5 or higher, establishing a new baseline as cheaper sell orders are depleted. The analyst notes that this effect may persist as banks adopt XRP for fast, low-cost international payments. Meanwhile, RLUSD acts as a stable bridge, making the process efficient and repeatable, potentially creating ongoing demand and sustained upward pressure on XRP’s price.