Сборщик RSS-лент

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) used a new X thread on Feb. 9 to reframe his criminal case as “Biden’s political lawfare,” positioning himself alongside Donald Trump and former FTX executive Ryan Salame in what read like a direct appeal for a future pardon.

“Biden’s lawfare machine threw bogus charges at me, Donald Trump, Ryan Salame, etc.,” Bankman-Fried wrote. “To make the charges stick, they prevented us from even being allowed to respond.” He opened with a blunt claim about process rather than facts: “Rule No. 1 of Biden’s political lawfare: Don’t let them present evidence.”

SBF Cries ‘Gagged Trial,’ Claims DOJ Hid Evidence

SBF’s argument hinges on the idea that authorities and the court curtailed what the jury could hear. He repeatedly singled out Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over his trial, claiming the court “rubber-stamped everything Biden’s DOJ wanted” and “made sure I couldn’t show the jury the truth.”

The “truth,” as SBF cast it, is a solvency narrative: “So they lied, said I stole billions of dollars and bankrupted FTX. But the money was always there and FTX was always solvent.” He also argued that restrictions prevented him from advancing that line at trial, writing that he was “prohibited” from “pointing out FTX was solvent” and from “even mentioning lawyers.”

In the thread, SBF linked to a court filing he said was authored by his prosecutor, “Sassoon,” describing it as “a 70-page document on all the evidence they didn’t want the jury to see,” and he framed the episode as part of a broader political effort to “silence the truth.”

A significant chunk of the thread is dedicated to Trump’s New York hush-money bookkeeping case, which Bankman-Fried portrayed as a routine classification dispute blown into criminality. “Charged him with 34 crimes over his bookkeeping of an NDA expense—should it be legal, campaign, or personal?,” he wrote. “These questions come up all the time when you’re running a business, and it’s often unclear.”

He then drew a parallel between court-imposed limits on Trump and his own pre-trial detention. “They then got the judge to impose a gag order on Donald Trump,” he wrote. “Biden’s DOJ silenced me, too—getting Judge Kaplan to gag and then jail me before trial. President Trump also had Kaplan as a judge.”

Bankman-Fried also amplified Salame’s complaints about licensing advice and charging decisions, alleging prosecutors leaned on pressure tactics to force a plea, including claims involving Salame’s fiancée, assertions presented as fact in the thread but not accompanied by supporting documentation beyond links to Salame’s posts.

The reaction underneath was unsparing, with multiple industry figures interpreting the thread less as a legal critique than a political pitch. “You’re a Delusional criminal who is now angling for a pardon,” wrote trader Bob Loukas. Attorney Ariel Givner was even more direct: “We GET it. You want a pardon from Trump.”

At press time, FTT traded at $0.3021.

Quick Facts:

• Bitcoin is consolidating under $70k; technicals suggest a breakout toward $85k-$100k if resistance at $72.5k clears.
• The primary downside risk is losing the $60k support, which could trigger a liquidation cascade toward $52k.
• Bitcoin Hyper uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-speed smart contracts to Bitcoin, raising over $31M in early capital.
• On-chain metrics show accumulation, but low volume on current rallies warrants caution regarding potential fake-outs.

Bitcoin is currently engaged in a tense standoff with the psychological $70,000 barrier, a ceiling that has held firm for weeks.

The market is witnessing a classic consolidation pattern: volatility compressing, leverage flushing, and price trading in a tight range. Historically, this quiet precedes a violent move. While retail traders grow impatient with the chop, on-chain data tells a different story beneath the surface.

The main culprit for this hesitation? A messy mix of macroeconomic ambiguity and short-term profit-taking. Yet, the macro thesis remains solid. With institutional ETF flows providing a soft floor and global liquidity cycles turning, the math favors a breakout. The question isn’t if Bitcoin breaks higher, but when the post-halving supply shock finally dries up the available liquidity on exchanges.

This compression phase forces capital to make a choice. While Bitcoin prepares for its next leg up, risk-tolerant capital is already rotating. Traders looking to maximize the coming cycle are hedging spot holdings with high-beta infrastructure plays.

That rotation suggests that while Bitcoin targets a conservative 2x, emerging protocols like Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) are capturing attention (and liquidity) for their potential to fix Bitcoin’s scaling issues before the bull market truly heats up.

Learn more about $HYPER here.

Technical Outlook: The Path to $100K Requires a Clean Break

Despite the immediate resistance at $70,000, Bitcoin’s high-timeframe structure remains aggressively bullish.

Analysts are eyeing the convergence of the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a setup that historically signals trend continuation rather than reversal. Plus, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has reset from overbought territory. That gives the asset room to run without overheating.

For the bulls to win, Bitcoin needs to reclaim the $72,500 level with real volume. A daily close above that zone would invalidate the bearish divergence and open a path toward price discovery.

Most technical models project that once $74,000 clears, the psychological vacuum pulls price rapidly toward the $85,000–$90,000 range. Consensus suggests a breakout here puts the $100,000 milestone in play by late Q3, fueled by corporate treasury adoption and ETF rebalancing.

However, risks remain. If the $60,000 support fails during a macro shakeout, the structure weakens significantly.

• Bull Case: A high-volume breach of $72,000 targets $88,000 in the medium term.
• Base Case: Another 2-3 weeks of chop between $64,000 and $71,000.
• Invalidation: A weekly close below $58,500 signals a deeper correction is needed to find liquidity.

Watch spot volume on Coinbase closely. If price pushes up while volume drops? It’s likely a fake-out.

Smart Money Rotates to Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) for L2 Utility

As Bitcoin battles resistance, sophisticated investors are looking at the rails that will power the network’s future. The focus is shifting toward Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the first Bitcoin Layer 2 integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).

While Bitcoin serves as pristine collateral, digital gold, it’s frankly too slow and expensive for DeFi. Bitcoin Hyper solves this by anchoring to Bitcoin for security while using SVM for high-speed execution.

The market’s appetite is clear. According to the official presale page, Bitcoin Hyper has raised $31.3M, with tokens currently priced at $0.0136754. That capital inflow suggests strong conviction in the ‘Bitcoin DeFi’ narrative.

By allowing developers to write in Rust and deploy dApps that settle on Bitcoin, the project bridges the gap between Bitcoin’s $1.3 trillion liquidity and modern functionality.

Whale activity backs this up. Etherscan records show that 3 whale wallets alone have accumulated $1M. The largest transaction, a $500K buy, occurred on Jan 15, 2026. (Note: Large-scale buy orders during a presale usually indicate institutional due diligence is finished).

Still, caution is necessary. Layer 2 protocols are high-risk environments subject to execution hurdles. While the promise of high APY staking and a Decentralized Canonical Bridge is appealing, $HYPER remains a beta play on the ecosystem’s expansion.

Buy $HYPER here.

This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile assets. The content provided is for informational purposes only. Your should conduct your own independent research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.

BitMine Immersion Technologies, возглавляемая сооснователем Fundstrat Global Advisors Томом Ли (Tom Lee), докупила 40 613 ETH на $83,2 млн, несмотря на нереализованные убытки в $7,5 млрд.

В Татарстане зафиксирован очередной случай мошенничества с криптовалютами. 37-летняя жительница Нижнекамска потеряла 3,6 млн рублей, вложив средства в фиктивный криптопроект.

A long‑running dispute between the US banking sector and the crypto industry is widening, with tensions now extending beyond stablecoin yields to a new regulatory flashpoint: “skinny” Federal Reserve (Fed) master accounts. 

According to a report published Monday by Crypto In America, the disagreement is emerging as another obstacle in an already strained relationship between traditional finance and digital asset firms.

Crypto‑Bank Tensions Grow

The issue comes as lawmakers continue to struggle with the passage of the anticipated crypto market structure legislation known as the CLARITY Act, which has been delayed in part by unresolved questions around whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer yield on stablecoins. 

Now, attention is shifting to the Federal Reserve’s proposal to introduce “skinny” master accounts, a limited form of Fed access that would allow eligible fintech and crypto firms to connect directly to the central bank’s payment infrastructure without receiving full banking privileges.

Eleanor Terret, the journalist closely tracking the bill’s progress in Washington, reported that banks and crypto advocates are sharply divided over the proposal. 

Terret noted that the disagreement became clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve last Friday by a broad range of stakeholders, including crypto companies, industry groups, banking trade associations and individual commentators.

Circle (CRCL) argued that granting limited Fed access would strengthen the overall payments system by increasing its resilience. The Blockchain Payments Consortium said skinny master accounts could help remove uncompetitive practices that disadvantage consumers and concentrate risk within a small number of large banks. 

However, not all crypto firms expressed full approval. Anchorage Digital described the proposal as a step in the right direction but criticized its limitations. 

The company noted that the accounts would not provide direct access to the Federal Reserve’s automated clearing house, nor would they allow firms to hold balances or earn interest on reserves—features Anchorage believes are necessary for meaningful participation in the payment system.

Fraud And Oversight Concerns 

Banks, by contrast, raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many of the entities likely to qualify for skinny accounts lack a long‑term supervisory history and are not governed by consistent federal safety and soundness standards. 

The group also pointed out that many crypto firms operate under regulatory frameworks that are still evolving. The Colorado Bankers Association echoed those worries, cautioning that expanded access could create opportunities for faster‑moving fraud.

The Federal Reserve has said it will review all submitted comments before drafting formal rules for skinny master accounts. Fed Governor Christopher Waller told Crypto In America that he hopes the central bank will be able to release a proposal for those rules in the fourth quarter of this year.

The debate is unfolding just ahead of a scheduled meeting at the White House on Tuesday, where officials are expected to bring together representatives from both the crypto and banking sectors in an attempt to ease tensions, particularly around the issue of stablecoin yield. 

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com