bitcoinist.com

Even while its price has been trending downward, XRP has achieved yet another crucial milestone that reinforces its role in the financial sector and solidifies its narrative as a reliable payment infrastructure. Several major organizations are persistently adding the altcoin to their payment method.

FinTech Notes Adds XRP To Official Glossary

XRP continues to cement its position in the broader cryptocurrency and financial landscape. In a notable step toward broader institutional recognition, IMF FinTech Notes has officially added the leading altcoin to its global financial glossary, which signals increased interest and acceptance of the digital asset within mainstream finance. 

XRP’s inclusion highlights its importance in international payments, regulatory debates, and cross-border settlement innovation by placing it alongside significant financial products and cutting-edge technologies. 

As seen in the Glossary list, the altcoin is now being listed alongside global payment terms such as Central bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Anti-money laundering and combating financing of terrorism (AML/CFT), Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS), and Circle’s USD Coin (USDC).

According to Crypto Dyl News, this is a significant achievement as it shows the token is being recognized as a legitimate cross-border settlement asset. With this milestone, the altcoin is now included in the same framework as central banks and global institutions. 

The move is a clear indication that the IMF is openly acknowledging Ripple’s growing role in global payments, pointing to more institutional adoption ahead. “This isn’t hype, it’s in their own glossary,” Crypto Dyl News added. 

A Foundational Building Block For The Digital Economy

Amid its growing interest and acceptance in mainstream finance, Franklin Templeton has hailed XRP as a foundational building block for the digital economy. The statement from the leading asset manager, which suggests a shift in institutional sentiment toward the Ripple-backed asset, has sent ripples throughout the crypto and financial landscape.

Roger Bayston, the head of digital assets at the firm, stated that fast-growing businesses are being propelled by blockchain innovation. In such an environment, digital asset tokens, such as XRP, function as powerful incentive mechanisms that support the development of decentralized networks and align the interests of stakeholders.

Franklin Templeton’s view is likely one of the key drivers behind the launch of its XRPZ Spot ETF, which provides regulated custody, daily transparency, and liquidity without the operational complexity of directly holding the altcoin. These kind of endorsements from large corporate firms portrays the token as essential infrastructure for the upcoming era of digital banking, rather than just another cryptocurrency.

Since the inception of the XRP Spot ETFs, demand for the altcoin is growing globally. John Squire, an investor and crypto influencer, shared an interesting report that proves Asia is becoming a battleground for crypto dominance, and the token is leading the charge.

In a notable takeover, XRP has officially overthrown Bitcoin and seized the top spot on Upbit, the biggest exchange in South Korea. This flip underscores Asia’s renewed interest in the altcoin and its long-term utility.

Cardano has just come through one of the most severe technical incidents in its history – a 14-hour chain split that founder Charles Hoskinson insists was “serious, but not existential.” In a late-November livestream, he walked viewers through Pi Lanningham’s “Poison Piggy – After Action Report,” a detailed post-mortem on what happened on November 21, 2025, and what it means for Cardano’s long-held “no downtime” narrative.

Inside Cardano’s 14-Hour Pig-Chain Meltdown

According to Lanningham, a serialization bug in Cardano’s node implementation created the conditions for a unidirectional soft fork. The issue first surfaced on November 20 on the preview testnet, when a malformed delegation certificate was accepted by some nodes and rejected by others. Older nodes correctly rejected the over-long hash; newer nodes, due to a November 2024 code change, truncated it and treated it as valid. That version skew created two incompatible views of the chain.

“The whole reason the testnet exists is to be a safe space” to find these failures, Hoskinson noted. Under normal circumstances, the bug would have been patched and quietly rolled out. Instead, after the fix was identified and was in the process of being communicated to stake pool operators, a near-identical malformed delegation was submitted to mainnet, this time delegating to RATSRATS – conceptually doubling the ticker of RATS, Hoskinson’s own stake pool.

That transaction split Cardano mainnet into two forks. The stricter fork, running older code that rejected the malformed hash, became the “chicken chain.” The permissive fork that accepted it was christened the “pig chain” or “poison piggy.” From that point, the network entered a race: would the poisoned transaction on the pig chain become immutable before the chicken chain could overtake it?

On impact, Lanningham’s numbers are blunt. Cardano remained live but degraded. Transaction inclusion via robust infrastructure slowed dramatically, with delays of up to roughly 400 seconds and block times on the now-dominant chain stretching to around 16 minutes at their worst. Over the incident window, 846 blocks were produced on the pig chain and around 13,900 on the chicken chain. Out of 14,383 observed transactions, 479 – roughly 3.3 percent – were included only on the discarded pig chain and never appeared on the final canonical history. Most of those, when resubmitted, turned out to be invalid due to expired validity intervals or conflicting inputs.

“This constitutes a serious degradation of service for users, but within expected bounds for a high-nines availability of service,” Lanningham wrote. His bottom-line checklist is terse: “Did the chain continue to make progress? Yes. Was service degraded? Yes. Were funds at risk? Potentially. Did the Cardano network recover under essentially worst case conditions? Yes. Would I have confidence to build my business on top of infrastructure that exhibited this level of robustness? Yes.”

The recovery itself is being held up by Hoskinson as proof of both decentralization and design. A patched node was already available thanks to the testnet incident; overnight, IOG, the Cardano Foundation, Emurgo, Intersect, exchanges and many SPOs coordinated via war-room calls and chat channels to upgrade to the fixed version and to follow the more restrictive chicken chain. There was no protocol-level rollback and no centralized “restart.” As stake migrated, block production on the pig chain slowed, the chicken chain accelerated, and Ouroboros’ probabilistic finality properties ensured that once the healthy fork overtook the poisoned one, nodes on the pig chain automatically switched to the longer, denser chain.

“This is the concrete evidence of when the Nakamoto consensus worked as intended and converged the network to a single canonical history,” Lanningham argued. Hoskinson went further, saying, “This could have killed other chains,” but here “time works differently in a distributed system” and effectively stretched the rollback window in Cardano’s favor.

Lessons Learned

Both, however, are clear about the downside. “The fact the bug appeared at all is a failure of our testing rigor,” Lanningham conceded. The reliance of almost all explorers on cardano-db-sync left the ecosystem “flying blind” when that component crashed on the malformed transaction. Many SPOs likely upgraded “blind,” trusting recommendations from founding entities rather than reasoning independently about fork choice. And certain off-chain systems – especially exchanges and bridges – were exposed to replay and double-spend risk, even if early evidence suggests real losses are unlikely.

The post-mortem thus doubles as a roadmap. Lanningham calls for stronger fuzzing and spec-driven testing, richer node-to-client protocols so wallets and exchanges can implement circuit breakers based on real consensus health, more diversity in monitoring stacks, and better education for SPOs on how Ouroboros behaves under stress. Hoskinson, for his part, floated the idea of an AI “upgrade sentinel” for operators and revived demands for a built-in pub/sub channel for emergency alerts.

For the broader narrative war, Lanningham’s position is deliberately dispassionate: “If, after that, you decide for yourself that Cardano ‘went down’, I won’t begrudge you your opinion. I’m not precious about that label… What matters is impact.” Hoskinson is less diplomatic, dismissing most social-media commentary as noise. What he wants the industry to take away is simpler: on November 24, 2025, after Poison Piggy, Cardano is back to one chain – and its next iteration of hardening has already begun.

At press time, ADA traded at $0.4141.

A staged fake-delivery encounter in San Francisco’s Mission Dolores district escalated into one of the city’s largest known individual crypto thefts, after a disguised assailant subdued a resident and escaped with assets worth $11 million, alongside the victim’s phone and laptop.

Mission Dolores Hit By $11M Crypto Robbery

According to a police report obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle, the Saturday evening robbery unfolded in broad daylight on the unit block of Dorland Street, only steps from Mission Dolores Park—a neighborhood where tech proximity and high-value assets have increasingly intersected with targeted crime.

Home-security footage posted by Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan captured the moments leading up to the heist. In the video, the suspect approaches the residence wearing dark clothing, a hooded sweatshirt, gloves and sunglasses, and holding a white package while deliberately turning his head away from the camera.

He rings the doorbell and asks for “Joshua,” claiming the box is addressed to him. The ruse continues when the resident opens the door and confirms his name. The man posing as a courier asks whether the victim can “sign for this,” pats his own pocket as though searching for a pen, and then asks the resident if he has one.

The moment the victim steps inside to retrieve a pen, the intruder follows him into the home and moves out of frame. A loud noise is heard. Police later confirmed that the suspect brandished a firearm and bound the victim with duct tape before fleeing with his belongings. Officers arrived at approximately 6:45 p.m. and found the victim with non-life-threatening injuries. No arrests had been made as of Monday morning, and authorities have not disclosed details about how the $11 million in cryptocurrency was accessed or transferred.

Tan publicly acknowledged the incident on X, describing the victim as a friend and community member. He urged anyone in the neighborhood with security footage from 4:30 to 6 p.m. to contact the San Francisco Police Department. “We have to find the perpetrator,” Tan wrote. “Time is of the essence.”

The Big Risk Of Self-Custody

In a follow-up post referencing the crypto theft, Tan added a pointed observation about crypto asset security: “Self custody of crypto seems like a good idea until it isn’t. Vault storage (at Coinbase or elsewhere) for long term holding is safest.” His comments drew immediate attention from both the tech and crypto communities, highlighting the tension between self-custody principles and the physical-security risks of storing large private-key access at home.

Thus, the incident has reignites a longstanding debate about personal-security practices among high-net-worth crypto holders in urban settings. While hacks, phishing attacks, SIM swaps and insider compromise have dominated crypto asset crime over the past decade, physical-world robberies—once rare—have become increasingly sophisticated.

The San Francisco case stands out due to the scale of assets stolen, the execution of the ruse and the direct commentary from one of Silicon Valley’s most visible figures.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.98 trillion.

Quick Facts:

• Bitcoin’s rebound toward $90K has been underpinned by digital asset treasuries, with institutional-style buyers steadily accumulating $BTC and $ETH through volatility.
• As $BTC becomes a core treasury asset, demand rises for infrastructure that makes Bitcoin usable in DeFi, payments, and programmable finance ecosystems.
• Bitcoin Hyper aims to fuse SVM-level performance with Bitcoin settlement, targeting low-latency, low-fee smart contracts that address $BTC’s speed and programmability gaps.
• $HYPER raised over $28.4M in presale with a price of $0.013325 and a projected release by Q1 2026; price predictions suggest a 1,400% ROI by the end of next year.

Bitcoin’s latest bounce has put the market back on offense.

After a sharp pullback that carved out several local lows, $BTC has climbed back toward the $90K zone, erasing much of the recent drawdown and reminding you how quickly sentiment can flip from fear to renewed greed in this cycle.

When treasury desks treat Bitcoin as strategic collateral rather than a trade, every 10% pullback looks less like a crash and more like a rebalancing opportunity. That structural bid is one reason $BTC’s slide stalled where it did, and why the rebound toward $90K has come with less forced liquidations.

For $BTC-centric altcoins, that backdrop is powerful. If more balance sheets are denominated in Bitcoin, demand naturally rises for infrastructure that makes $BTC productive: usable in DeFi, payments, gaming, and beyond.

That’s the lane Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is trying to own – a Bitcoin Layer 2 that bolts Solana-style performance onto Bitcoin’s settlement layer, aiming to turn dormant $BTC into programmable capital.

You can buy $HYPER on the official presale page today.

Why Bitcoin’s Rebound Supercharges The Hyper Race

$BTC’s recovery toward $90K is reinforcing a familiar tension: the asset that dominates crypto’s market cap is still clunky to use.

On-chain transactions can take minutes or even hours to confirm, fee spikes can push simple transfers into double-digit dollar costs, and native programmability is essentially absent on the base layer.

That’s why capital has been rotating into Bitcoin infrastructure. You’ve seen the rise of Lightning for payments, sidechains like Rootstock for EVM-compatible contracts, and newer rollup-style designs experimenting with Bitcoin as a settlement and data-availability layer.

Each tries to solve the same trilemma: keep Bitcoin’s security while adding speed, scale, and a cost-effective profile.

Zooming in, Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) positions itself as a modular Bitcoin Layer 2 built around the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).

The idea is straightforward but ambitious: use Bitcoin L1 purely for settlement and state anchoring, while pushing execution to an SVM-based L2 that can, in theory, process smart contracts faster than Solana’s own mainnet.

Instead of trying to cram complex logic onto Bitcoin itself, $HYPER runs a real-time execution environment where Solana-style programs – written in Rust and compatible with modified SPL token standards – execute with extremely low latency and sub-cent fees.

On paper, that architecture targets the three pain points Bitcoin users know well:

• The Canonical Bridge reduces finality times to seconds
• The batched transactions bring fees down, keeping the network cheap and eliminating the fee-based priority system
• Improve scalability, allowing for more and faster transactions, helping Bitcoin grow at scale.

All this without impacting Bitcoin’s native security or brand appeal.

If the proposition makes sense to you, you can buy $HYPER right here.

$HYPER Presale, Predictions, and Release Date

The Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) presale has raised over $28.4M, with $HYPER valued at $0.013325 – a material signal that a segment of the market is willing to fund a Bitcoin-centric, SVM-powered experiment while $BTC trades near cycle highs.

For you as a $BTC holder or builder, the potential unlock is straightforward: move wrapped $BTC into Bitcoin Hyper’s Layer 2, tap high-speed payments, access DeFi protocols, or deploy Rust-based dApps without leaving Bitcoin’s security umbrella.

The utility is obvious and feeds into the hype we’re seeing right now, which explains the presale’s impressive performance.

Based on these factors, our price prediction for $HYPER post-launch puts the token at $0.20 by the end of 2026 and $1.50 by 2030. In terms of raw profit, you’re looking at an ROI of 1,400% for a 1-year investment and 11,155% for a 5-year one.

Naturally, these numbers can fluctuate depending on market conditions, but considering Bitcoin Hyper’s utility, our vote is for it to increase over time.

You can read more about what Bitcoin Hyper is right here, or our guide on how to buy $HYPER before visiting the presale page.

As a final heads-up: $HYPER has a projected release window between Q4 2025 and Q1 2026, so there’s not much time left.

Go to the official presale page and buy your $HYPER today.

This isn’t financial advice. DYOR before investing.

Authored by Bogdan Patru, Bitcoinist: https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-$90k-market-rebounds-as-bitcoin-hyper-reaches-$28M

Stay Ahead with Our Immediate Analysis of Today’s Bitcoin Insights

Check out our Live Bitcoin Updates for November 25, 2025!

In 2010, Bitcoin was worth a few cents. One year later, it hit $20. In six years, it was $17,000, and only a month ago, it hit an ATH of $126K, a 641% in six years and 629,900% in 14 years.

Historically, if you’d invested in Bitcoin at launch, you’d have an ROI of 188,643,000%. The likes of Mastercard, JP Morgan, and scores of S&P 500 companies are buying Bitcoin in droves.

Arthur Hayes just predicted $BTC to hit $200K by the end of 2025, and Saylor is doubling down on Bitcoin despite the crypto’s slump to under $85K.

There’s never been anything like Bitcoin before, and investors are waking up to that reality. If you’re looking for the newest insights on Bitcoin, you’re in the right place.

We update this page regularly throughout the day with the latest insider insights for Bitcoin maxis. Keep refreshing to stay ahead of the pack!

Disclaimer: No crypto investment comes without risk. Our content is for informational purposes, not financial advice. We may earn affiliate commissions at no extra cost to you. Pepe’s Wedge, Bitcoin Meme Cycles, And Maxi Doge ($MAXI) Positioning

November 25, 2025 • 12:00 UTC

Pepe bleeds around 75% from this year’s peak and roughly 85% from its all-time high while exchange balances jump by trillions of tokens.

You see supply piling up on centralized venues and a falling wedge forming on the chart, which often precedes sharp but short-lived squeezes.

That setup tells you the trade is now mostly about positioning and liquidity games rather than any new fundamental catalyst. Meme capital eventually hunts for fresher narratives once the old ones feel overcrowded.

Maxi Doge ($MAXI) captures that rotation. It’s a meme coin built around maxed-out trading culture, using its token as the core utility for staking, ecosystem rewards, and community-driven campaigns.

The focus sits on turning volatility into a feature through gamified incentives and aligned tokenomics. With $4.19M already raised at a presale price of $0.00027, you step in before the brand, listings, and community incentives meet full market liquidity.

This gives you cleaner exposure to the next wave of bitcoin-driven meme flows.

Our $MAXI price prediction calls out big gains in the future.

Solana Supply Shift, Bitcoin Rotation, And PEPENODE ($PEPENODE) Mine-To-Earn Potential

November 25, 2025 • 11:00 UTC

Solana rallies as activity jumps and developers push emission changes that make future $SOL supply more restrictive.

You watch this happen while $BTC trades near record zones, and you see a familiar pattern: once Bitcoin cools, capital often rotates into high-performance chains where blockspace actually gets used for gaming, memes, and yield.

That is where execution speed, cost, and actual user experience start to matter more than headline market cap. Read more.

PEPENODE ($PEPENODE) sits right in that lane. It mixes meme energy with a mine-to-earn system where you build out a virtual mining setup and earn token rewards tied to your in-game effort and on-chain participation, not just speculation.

That gives the token a clear loop between user activity and value capture.

With $2.19M already raised at a presale price of $0.0011638, you enter while the ecosystem, reward structure, and community are still early, giving you asymmetric upside if bitcoin-era liquidity keeps rotating into interactive, gamified projects.

Read our PEPENODE price prediction.

Bitcoin Nears $90K as Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) Turns Bitcoin Into High-Throughput Rails

November 25, 2025 • 10:00 UTC

After a brutal shakeout that sent $BTC into the low $80,000s, Bitcoin now grinds back toward the $90,000 area.

You see ETF outflows slowing, spot demand returning, and the same familiar problem reappearing: every spike in volatility brings mempool congestion and aggressive fee spikes on the base layer.

That price action proves Bitcoin still leads the macro risk trade, but it also shows you how limited the L1 is once usage really ramps.

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) goes straight at that bottleneck. It uses a Solana Virtual Machine stack as a bitcoin Layer-2, locking your $BTC on L1 and minting it on a high-throughput L2 so you can push it into DeFi, NFTs, and dApps while still settling back to bitcoin.

With $28.45M already raised at a presale price of $0.013325, you position yourself in the infra that benefits every time the next bitcoin cycle overloads the base chain again.

Here’s how to buy $HYPER now.

Franklin’s Expanded Crypto ETF, Best Wallet Token ($BEST), And The Bitcoin Diversification Shift

November 25, 2025 • 10:00 UTC

Franklin Templeton’s crypto index ETF is moving from a simple $BTC and $ETH exposure play into a broader basket that adds XRP, Solana, Dogecoin, Cardano, Stellar, and Chainlink.

That change shows you how fast institutional flows are rotating from a pure bitcoin trade into diversified multi-asset exposure, all packaged inside regulated wrappers. Each added asset is another network, another wallet, and another bridge the average holder needs to manage.

Best Wallet Token ($BEST) is built to simplify that mess. It powers a non-custodial, MPC-secured wallet that aims to support 60+ chains, on-chain swaps, and direct access to curated presales from one app, while keeping you in full control of your keys.

The $BEST token underpins the ecosystem with reduced fees, staking, and access perks.

With $17.45M raised so far at a presale price of $0.025995, you align with the wallet layer that benefits as bitcoin-era investors expand into a full multi-chain stack.

Read our $BEST buying guide for more information.

Authored by Bogdan Patru, Bitcoinist — https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-live-news-today-november-25-2025

The PEPE price was one of the worst hit in the market crash that began back in October 2025. Since then, its price has been down by more than 50%, marking a significant decline for one of the largest meme coins in the space. Even now, the altcoin continues to struggle as sell-offs have pushed it to levels not seen in over a year. However, there is still the possibility that the PEPE price will rally, as highlighted by crypto analyst MMBTtrader, who pointed out a bullish formation.

Why The PEPE Price Could Be On The Rise

According to the analysis that was shared on the TradingView website, the PEPE price could be on the verge of forming its bottom. This comes after a 41% decline in a 30-day period, as shown by data from CoinMarketCap, finally pushing the meme coin toward $0.000004. The implication of a bottom from this level would mean that the price is ready to rebound again.

Looking at the recent PEPE price action, MMBTtrader explains that the meme coin already looks to be completing its bearish phase, which has been a year in the making. The major signal that points to this is the fact that the cryptocurrency had fallen below a major daily support level at $0.0000045.

The result of this break of the support level is that the PEPE price is now retesting the broken trendline. This trendline had begun in May 2025 and had persisted into the last quarter of the year. But with the retest already happening, it could mean the end of this bearish trendline.

As the crypto analyst explains, this retest could end up with the resistance level now turning into support for the coin. If the price is rejected from the descending trendline, then the result would mean that the PEPE price would stage a bounce.

The target for such a breakout is a 430% increase in price that would put the PEPE price as high as $0.000022 by 2026, just a short way from its all-time high price. However, there is still major resistance at $0.00000958, and then another one at $0.00001340 that the meme coin must beat to complete this move.

When President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law this past July, it marked a significant moment in the US legislative landscape, often heralded as the first comprehensive crypto bill aimed at fostering the growth and adoption of digital assets. 

However, a recent analysis raises questions about the true purpose of this legislation, suggesting that it may be more about managing government debt than regulating crypto.

Crypto As New Mechanism For Government Debt Demand?

Market expert and crypto author Shanaka Anslem recently took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to share his insights, asserting that while many believed the GENIUS Act was primarily focused on regulating cryptocurrencies, emerging data reveals a different narrative. 

He noted, “EVERYONE THOUGHT THE GENIUS ACT WAS ABOUT CRYPTO REGULATION. THE DATA JUST PROVED IT WAS SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.”

The initial buzz surrounding the bill faded after just 48 hours, overshadowed by discussions of tech regulation and stablecoin rules. However, new statistics paint a starkly different picture of the bill’s implications. 

Embedded within the 47 pages of the legislation was a critical requirement: every dollar of stablecoin must be backed 100% by US Treasury bills, eliminating any alternatives, such as cash in banks or corporate bonds.

At the time the GENIUS Act was enacted, the stablecoin market cap stood at approximately $200 billion. Today, that figure has risen to roughly $309 billion, which can now be legally mandated for purchasing US government debt over just four months. 

According to Treasury Secretary Bessent’s official projections, this trend could lead to $3 trillion in purchases by 2030. 

Anslem noted that the implications of this requirement are profound: the government no longer has to seek out buyers for its debt, as the law creates an automatic buyer each time someone purchases a digital dollar. This essentially means that for every stablecoin created, a corresponding Treasury bill must be bought.

Shift In Regulatory Control?

Research from the Bank for International Settlements reveals that every $3.5 billion in stablecoin growth results in a 0.025% reduction in the government’s borrowing costs. 

The expert noted that when the market reaches the projected $3 trillion, this could save taxpayers approximately $114 billion annually, translating to about $900 in lower debt costs for each US household.

Bessent confirmed these findings last week, stating that increased stablecoin issuance means the Treasury does not need to enlarge its bond auctions. In effect, the government has found a new way to finance its spending without relying on traditional buyers.

This shift has not gone unnoticed, even by institutions once skeptical of cryptocurrencies. JPMorgan, for instance, which spent the last decade dismissing crypto as a fraud, announced last month that it would now accept Bitcoin as collateral. 

The crux of this transformation lies in the allocation of regulatory control from the Federal Reserve (Fed) to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which now reports directly to the Treasury Secretary. Anslem concluded his analysis, stating:

The Treasury now controls who can create digital dollars. And the law requires those digital dollars to fund government debt. This is not monetary policy. This is legislative engineering of debt demand. And it’s been operational since July.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) Z-Score has declined to the lowest levels since the price was at $35,000.

Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score Has Plummeted Recently

In a new post on X, Glassnode analyst Chris Beamish has discussed about the latest trend in the Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score. This on-chain indicator calculates the difference between the market cap of BTC and its Realized Cap, and takes its ratio with the standard deviation of the market cap.

The Realized Cap here refers to a capitalization model for the asset that calculates its total value by assuming the ‘real’ value of each coin in circulation is equal to the price at which it was last transacted on the blockchain.

In short, what this metric represents is the amount of capital that the investors as a whole have put into the cryptocurrency. In contrast, the market cap is the value that they are carrying in the present.

As the Bitcoin MVRV Z-score compares the market cap with the Realized Cap, it essentially tells us whether the overall network is in a state of profit or loss.

Now, here is the chart shared by Beamish that shows the trend in the Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score over the last few years:

As is visible in the above graph, the Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score has gone through a decline recently. This drop in investor profitability is a result of the bearish trajectory that the cryptocurrency’s price has followed.

The metric is still a notable distance above the zero mark, which suggests the market cap continues to be greater than the Realized Cap. In other words, the investors are still in a state of net unrealized profit.

The degree of the holder gain, however, is low when compared to the profitability level of the last couple of years. In fact, the current MVRV Z-Score is at a similar level to when Bitcoin was trading around the $35,000 level.

Historically, a cooldown in investor profitability has facilitated bottom formations for the cryptocurrency. Usually, however, major bearish phases have only reached their lows when the network has outright gone underwater.

Currently, Bitcoin still has some ways to go before this can happen. Though, it’s possible that the current level is enough for the asset to reach a bottom, as it has already done a few times over this cycle.

Just like how a low value on the MVRV Z-Score can lead to a bottom, a high one can result in a top instead as profit-taking explodes. From the chart, it’s apparent that the metric reached an extreme level during the bull run in the first half of 2021.

So far in the current cycle, no peak in the indicator has been of a similar scale; the tops this time around have formed at a comparable profitability level to the second-half 2021 bull run.

BTC Price

Bitcoin has rebounded since its low below $81,000 on Friday as its price has now climbed back to $88,600.

Bitcoin mining has seen a resurgence in China despite being banned since 2021, with miners quietly starting operations to use cheap electricity.

China Now Accounts For 14% Of The Global Bitcoin Hashrate

Back in 2021, China enforced its infamous Bitcoin trading and mining ban, triggering a bearish slump for the market and resulting in a global Hashrate crash. At the time, the country made up the largest share of BTC mining in the world.

The crackdown meant that the nation’s miners had to relocate elsewhere, which was a slow process, and it wasn’t until many months later that the cryptocurrency’s Hashrate, a measure of the total amount of computing power connected to the network, was able to recover.

As data from Blockchain.com shows, the 7-day Hashrate witnessed a decline of more than 50% between May and July 2021.

The metric gradually recovered after the July bottom and reached the same levels as pre-China ban by December of that year. Since then, the network has seen rapid expansion, and today, the Hashrate is so huge that the China ban only appears like a blip on the chart.

Interestingly, though, part of the latest expansion in the metric has been coming from a source few would expect. As reported by Reuters, mining in China is quietly observing a resurgence.

Major Bitcoin mining machine maker Canaan has seen a significant rebound in sales in China, with 30.3% of its global revenues coming from the country last year. “China’s contribution to Canaan’s sales jumped further to more than 50% during the second quarter this year,” noted Reuters, citing an unnamed source with direct knowledge.

Bitcoin mining data provider Hashrate Index also shows growth in China, putting the country’s latest share of global mining at 14%.

Only Russia (15.5%) and the US (37.7%) host a larger share of the world Hashrate. Thus, it seems the country has quickly grown back into dominance. As for what’s behind the growth, the answer seems to be a mix of the cryptocurrency’s bull run, availability of cheap electricity in some provinces, and a subtle shift in the nation’s stance toward the sector.

Earlier in the year, Beijing was weighing a plan to allow the use of yuan-pegged stablecoins more widely outside of China. In September, the first such class of assets was launched in Kazakhstan.

Hong Kong approved its stablecoin bill in August, allowing private companies to apply for an issuer license in the Chinese city. As of yet, though, no licenses have been handed out.

BTC Price

Bitcoin saw a brief fall below $81,000 on Friday, but its price has since bounced back as it’s now floating around $86,000.

The crypto industry and supporters, including Senator Cynthia Lummis, are expressing strong discontent over JPMorgan’s recent decision to close the account of Strike CEO Jack Mallers.

Lummis, a pro-crypto voice in Congress, highlighted this incident as part of a larger issue, referencing Operation Chokepoint 2.0, a term used to describe the coordinated effort by federal banking authorities to restrict access to banking services for the digital asset sector.

‘Operation Chokepoint 2.0 Lives On’

Mallers took to social media platform X (previously Twitter) to share his bewilderment over his account closure, stating, “Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase threw me out of the bank. It was bizarre. My dad has been a private client there for 30+ years.” 

He indicated that when he sought clarification from JPMorgan about the closure, he received no substantial answers, only being informed that they couldn’t disclose details. 

In a letter from the bank, he was notified of unspecified “concerning activity” on his accounts, which asserted that JPMorgan might not be able to open new accounts for him in the future. 

Lummis weighed in on the matter, stating on X, “Operation Chokepoint 2.0 regrettably lives on. Policies like JP Morgan’s undermine confidence in traditional banks and send the digital asset industry overseas.” 

She stressed the urgency of addressing these issues, asserting that it is time to put Operation Chokepoint to rest and position the US as the digital asset capital of the world.

The controversy surrounding JPMorgan intensified when Bo Hines, a former head of Trump’s Council of Advisers on Digital Assets and now advisor to stablecoin issuer Tether, publicly confronted the bank. 

He remarked, “Hey Chase… you guys know Operation Choke Point is over, right? Just checking,” drawing attention to the perceived disconnect between JPMorgan’s actions and the positive regulatory landscape surrounding crypto assets.

JPMorgan Boycott?

In addition to these criticisms, a more significant concern emerged with JPMorgan’s warnings about potential consequences for Strategy (MSTR). NewsBTC reported last week that Michael Saylor’s firm may lose its standing in key indices, such as MSCI USA and the Nasdaq 100, due to proposed changes by MSCI. 

Analysts from JPMorgan claimed that this change could trigger passive outflows estimated between $2.8 billion and $8.8 billion if the MSCI decision proceeds as anticipated by January 15.

MSCI has suggested proposals to exclude companies with more than 50% of their assets in digital currencies from its global indexes, putting Strategy at significant risk. 

JPMorgan analysts noted, “MicroStrategy is at risk of exclusion from major equity indices as the January 15th MSCI decision approaches,” underscoring the urgency of the situation.

Market expert Adam Livingston voiced his frustrations on social media, calling for a boycott of JPMorgan and accusing the bank of waging a “war with Bitcoin.” 

He emphasized that JPMorgan underestimated the resilience of the Bitcoin community, asserting that they thought they could undermine MSTR without repercussions. 

Livingston recalled that the bank, which benefited from bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis, seemed to assume Bitcoin supporters would remain subdued and obedient.

Amid the controversy surrounding one of the world’s top banking institutions, Bitcoin witnessed a tiny recovery on Monday, trading at $87,830 when writing, following a significant plunge that saw the market’s leading cryptocurrency retrace all the way down to $80,000 last Friday. 

Featured image from Reuters, chart from TradingView.com 

According to Sal Gilbertie, CEO of Teucrium, Ripple could be closer to the kind of regulated bank that many in finance do not expect.

He told listeners that a clear US regulatory framework and a formal banking license for Ripple would be the real switch that unlocks big institutional interest in XRP. That idea is getting attention in crypto markets today.

CEO Sees Ripple As A Bank

Gilbertie compared Ripple’s organization to a financial institution with strong capital and coordinated leadership. He pointed out that Ripple’s network includes many former employees who stay active in the wider ecosystem, which he said helps the company expand even when people move on.

According to Gilbertie, the firm functions much like “a machine.” He also asked a sharp question about token sales:

“Why would they want to sell XRP? They’re incredibly well capitalized.”

That comment was offered to calm concerns that Ripple might flood the market with tokens.

Ripple’s Token Strategy And Reserves

Based on reports, Gilbertie believes Ripple has less motive to sell large amounts of XRP as its balance sheet grows and use cases for the token increase.

He framed XRP as a tool that could be used by institutional clients and a bank, noting that holding tokens could be similar to how banks keep capital reserves.

Critics point out Ripple has sold XRP in the past to fund operations. But Gilbertie argued that a licensed Ripple Bank would change how those holdings are treated and how often they are moved.

Regulatory Clarity And A Banking License

Regulatory clarity in the US is central to Gilbertie’s view. He said that a banking license, combined with clear rules, would open doors to products and clients who now wait on the sidelines.

That is the milestone he expects will have the most direct impact on price and demand. Until regulators spell out how these services will work, many institutional buyers remain cautious.

Market Moves And Volatility

Volatility has marked XRP’s recent path. Reports noted that some market swings are part of a broader trend where assets that surged by “hundreds of percent” in the prior year then give back gains.

Gilbertie described a 30–50% pullback as natural after big rallies. He added that falling volatility in major assets, plus more institutional entry through ETFs and a friendlier US administration toward crypto, may make markets calmer over time as more supply is held by long-term owners.

Featured image from Gemini, chart from TradingView

Bitcoin has officially entered a capitulation phase as relentless selling pressure and macro uncertainty push the market into one of its most stressful moments of the cycle. After reaching its $126,000 all-time high in early October, BTC has collapsed to a fresh local low near $80,000 in under two months — a stunning 35% drawdown that has shaken investor confidence. Many market participants who expected a continuation of the bullish trend are now facing steep unrealized losses, amplifying fear and forcing short-term holders to exit at a loss.

According to top analyst Axel Adler, the strength of the US dollar has become one of the dominant forces behind this wave of capitulation. As the DXY index holds firmly above 100, global liquidity tightens, historical patterns show that Bitcoin short-term holders tend to realize losses more aggressively. Adler notes that this dynamic is currently playing out with intensity, mirroring previous phases of market stress.

However, not all signals point downward. The probability of a December Federal Reserve rate cut has climbed to 69%, and Adler suggests that if markets begin pricing this more aggressively, it could flip macro momentum and trigger a reversal. For now, Bitcoin remains in a fragile state — but a macro catalyst may be forming.

Short-Term Holder Capitulation Deepens as Macro Pressure Overrides Behavioral Signals

Axel Adler explains that short-term holders are now realizing losses with an intensity comparable to some of Bitcoin’s most violent historical shocks — including the COVID crash of 2020, the China mining ban in 2021, and the Luna collapse in 2022.

The latest data shows that SOPR Momentum, a key indicator of realized profitability, has dropped nearly to 0, a level that typically marks full capitulation among reactive market participants. Historically, readings this depressed have aligned with explosive V-shaped reversals or sharp relief rallies, as selling pressure becomes exhausted and stronger hands begin absorbing supply.

However, Adler emphasizes an important nuance: while behavioral capitulation is clearly underway, macro forces currently dominate market structure. Extreme SOPR readings can produce bottoms, but they can also generate short-lived bounces within broader downtrends when macro conditions remain unfavorable. With the dollar index (DXY) still elevated above 100, liquidity remains tight — and Bitcoin continues to trade under pressure.

Adler notes that everything now hinges on the Federal Reserve. If markets begin actively pricing in the December rate cut, it could weaken the dollar and relieve some of the stress weighing on BTC. Until then, macro remains the stronger force, overshadowing even severe capitulation signals.

Testing Support After a Steep Breakdown

Bitcoin’s price action on the 1D chart shows the market attempting to stabilize after one of the sharpest multi-week declines of this cycle. BTC dropped from the $126,000 peak to the $80,000–$86,000 range in less than two months, and the chart clearly reflects this capitulation structure. The series of long red candles highlights aggressive selling pressure, with bears firmly in control throughout November.

The chart shows BTC trading below all major moving averages—the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day—confirming a clear breakdown in trend structure. The 200-day MA around the mid-$88K region is now acting as resistance rather than support. This flip is typically a bearish signal and aligns with the ongoing macro-driven weakness highlighted by analysts across the market.

Volume remains elevated during the downturn, reinforcing that the sell-off has been driven by strong hands exiting. However, the most recent candles show wicks forming near $83K–$86K, suggesting early attempts at demand absorption. If BTC can hold above the recent low around $80K and close back above the 200-day MA, the market could see a short-term relief rally.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

Ethereum (ETH) is showing early signs of stabilization after a turbulent month, bouncing back above the crucial $2,800 level as fresh institutional inflows reignite optimism across the market.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Quantum-Break Catastrophe Is Pure FUD, Says Gabor Gurbacs

ETH currently trades near $2,821, up modestly over the past 24 hours, with traders closely watching to see whether this rebound can evolve into a sustained trend reversal. The renewed momentum follows major accumulation from BitMine, which has doubled down on its Ethereum strategy despite steep market drawdowns.

BitMine’s $59M ETH Accumulation Sparks Fresh Investor Confidence

The catalyst for Ethereum’s latest recovery came on November 23, when blockchain data confirmed that BitMine acquired 21,537 ETH worth roughly $59–60 million. The purchase increases the company’s total holdings to more than 3.5 million ETH, equivalent to approximately 3% of Ethereum’s circulating supply.

While Ethereum prices have fallen nearly 30% in the last month, BitMine maintains that the downturn stems from a temporary liquidity shock rather than deteriorating fundamentals.

Bitmine is simultaneously expanding its ecosystem footprint through its upcoming MAVAN staking network, expected to launch in early 2026, and recently announced a dividend issuance, moves that collectively signal long-term conviction.

Investors appear to be taking notice. Exchange reserves have dipped to multi-year lows as whales continue accumulating ETH, even as traditional ETF products face outflows. This divergence suggests deep-pocketed players view the current range as a strategic entry zone.

Ethereum Battles the Downtrend but Momentum Improves

Despite the bounce, Ethereum remains inside a steep descending channel, with resistance stacking between $2,947 and $3,000. This zone contains compressed EMAs, trendline resistance, and the upper Bollinger Band, making it the first major test for buyers.

A clean break above $3,000 could pave the way for ETH to reach $3,120, $3,250, and potentially even $3,450. However, a failure at this level may send ETH back toward $2,760 or lower.

Indicators remain mixed. The RSI near 40 signals oversold conditions, hinting that a reversal may be developing, while the MACD and moving averages still indicate lingering bearish pressure.

Rising open interest and elevated long-short ratios across exchanges reflect aggressive long positioning, momentum that could amplify volatility in either direction.

Institutional Products and Upgrades Add Momentum

Beyond price action, Ethereum continues to gain structural support. The Singapore Exchange just launched regulated ETH perpetual futures, giving institutions a compliant on-ramp. Meanwhile, anticipation builds around Ethereum’s December Fusaka upgrade, expected to deliver meaningful scalability improvements.

With whales accumulating, institutional demand rising, and network upgrades approaching, Ethereum’s rebound above $2,800 may be more than a dead-cat bounce.

Related Reading: JPMorgan Backlash Explodes: Bitcoin Supporters Push Hard For Boycott

But breaking the downtrend ultimately depends on whether buyers can reclaim the $3,000–$3,100 resistance range, a battleground that will determine the next major swing.

Cover image from ChatGPT, ETHUSD chart from Tradingview

Bitcoin has lost more than 35% of its value since early October, dropping sharply from its $126,000 all-time high and sending the market into full panic mode. Sentiment has deteriorated quickly, with liquidations, forced selling, and collapsing confidence pushing price action into deeply oversold territory.

Most analysts now argue that Bitcoin has officially entered a bear market, pointing to structural breakdowns and the violent rejection from cycle highs. However, a smaller but vocal group of market participants still believes the cycle is not over, claiming that the recent crash reflects capitulation—not long-term exhaustion.

Supporting this view, key on-chain data from analyst Darkfost highlights a critical signal: the BTC NVT Golden Cross. This indicator evaluates Bitcoin’s valuation relative to its transactional and on-chain activity. Darkfost notes that when the NVT Golden Cross drops below –1.6, Bitcoin historically becomes undervalued, often preceding sharp mean-reversion rallies and major recovery points.

With the indicator now approaching this oversold threshold again, some see this collapse as a potentially attractive long opportunity rather than the beginning of a prolonged downturn.

Bitcoin NVT Golden Cross Signals Opportunity, but Risks Remain Elevated

Darkfost explains that the current NVT Golden Cross reading has triggered a preset alert designed specifically to identify short-term opportunities. Historically, when this indicator dives into deeply negative territory, it often aligns with moments when Bitcoin becomes temporarily undervalued relative to its on-chain activity.

Traders frequently use these signals to establish long positions or accumulate spot BTC at discounted levels. However, Darkfost also cautions that this is far from a perfect signal. It works best during healthy market structures, not during periods of aggressive macro stress or cascading liquidations.

The present environment is one of the most challenging of the cycle. Liquidity has thinned, volatility has exploded, and systemic fear dominates behavior across Bitcoin, altcoins, and risk assets globally. Under these conditions, Darkfost warns that leverage should be avoided entirely. Even historically reliable signals lose accuracy when price action becomes disorderly, and sharp intraday swings can invalidate setups within hours.

The coming days will be decisive. Investors are watching closely to see whether Bitcoin can stabilize above local support and form a base—or whether selling pressure will extend, confirming the bearish thesis. Either way, the next move is likely to define the market’s trajectory heading into year-end.

Testing Deep Support After a Sharp Breakdown

Bitcoin’s 3-day chart shows a market fighting to stabilize after one of the steepest corrections of this cycle. Price has tumbled from the $126K peak in early October to the $86K region, briefly tagging liquidity below $85K before rebounding.

The structure now reflects heavy downside momentum: BTC has broken below both the 50-day and 100-day moving averages, flipping them into resistance. The 200-day moving average — currently sitting near $88K — is now acting as a critical dynamic support level and the last major line before deeper structural damage.

What stands out most is the surge in volume accompanying this decline, confirming aggressive selling rather than a low-liquidity drift. This aligns with the broader capitulation narrative seen across on-chain metrics. Candle structure signals exhaustion on the downside, with long lower wicks showing buyers stepping in near key liquidity zones.

However, BTC remains in a vulnerable position: any daily close below the 200-day moving average risks opening the door to a deeper slide toward the $78K–$80K region.

For bulls, reclaiming $90K is essential to shift momentum and invalidate a cascading lower-high, lower-low sequence. Until then, the chart signals caution — but also the potential for a short-term relief rally if buyers defend current levels.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

As global markets enter a tense, data-heavy week, traders across both traditional finance and digital assets are bracing for heightened volatility.

A wave of critical U.S. economic releases, paired with rapidly shifting expectations around Federal Reserve policy, is shaping what could be one of the most pivotal moments for crypto heading into the year-end.

Inflation and Jobs Data Set the Tone for a Volatile Week

This week’s U.S. macro calendar is unusually crowded. Investors are watching the Producer Price Index (PPI) set for release on November 25, followed by jobless claims and the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index on November 26, the Fed’s most trusted inflation gauge.

Rising PPI numbers often signal future consumer price pressure, while jobless claims reveal the underlying strength of the labor market. Strong labor data typically argues against aggressive rate cuts, whereas elevated claims reinforce expectations for Fed easing.

With U.S. markets closed on November 27 and trading shortened on November 28, Bitcoin and other digital assets face a two-day window where low volume could magnify even modest price swings. Analysts warn that crypto’s historical sensitivity to macro shifts makes this week’s data especially consequential.

Dovish Rate Expectations Revive Hopes of a Crypto Rebound

Just days ago, the odds of a December rate cut hovered near 30%. Now, futures markets have flipped sharply, pricing a roughly 70% probability of a 25-basis-point cut. Remarks from New York Fed President John Williams hinting at room for further policy “adjustment” added fuel to the shift.

This dovish repositioning follows Bitcoin’s dramatic drop from its all-time high above $126,000, which triggered widespread liquidations and sparked fears of a deeper downturn.

Nonetheless, analysts argue the recent sell-off may have cleared excess leverage, with Swissblock noting a sharp decline in risk-off signals. Many now expect stabilization and a potential grind higher if liquidity improves.

Regulatory Decisions Add Another Layer of Uncertainty

Beyond the Fed, all eyes are on the SEC as it prepares to issue rulings on multiple crypto ETFs, including those tied to Solana and XRP, decisions that could unlock significant institutional inflows.

Meanwhile, regulatory pressure from abroad, such as Korea’s FIU crackdown on major exchanges, is reshaping compliance costs across the industry.

With inflation trends, monetary policy shifts, and regulatory decisions converging at once, crypto markets face a defining moment. The next few days may determine whether digital assets recover into December, or face yet another bout of turbulence.

Cover image from ChatGPT, XRPUSD chart from Tradingview

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), co-founder of Binance, is once again in the spotlight as a new lawsuit accuses him and the cryptocurrency exchange of enabling millions of dollars in financial transactions for Hamas and other designated terrorist organizations.

Binance Accused Of Laundering $1 Billion For Terror Groups

The legal action, filed in North Dakota federal court, involves 306 plaintiffs, including victims and relatives of individuals affected by Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. 

According to the complaint, Binance allegedly laundered significant amounts of money for groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. 

The plaintiffs assert that these transactions exceeded $1 billion, with more than $50 million processed through Binance following the recent attacks. The lawsuit claims that Binance intentionally positioned itself as a “safe haven for illicit activities.” 

The plaintiffs argue that the exchange’s operations have not been meaningfully altered, stating, “When a company chooses profit over even the most basic counterterrorism obligations, it must be held accountable — and it will be,” said Lee Wolosky, an attorney representing the victims.

In response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson from Binance has refrained from commenting on the specifics of the case, asserting only that the company fully complies with internationally recognized sanctions laws. 

Suspicious Crypto Transactions

Compounding the situation, the complaint highlights suspicious activities involving cryptocurrency transactions that flowed through accounts with no clear financial justification. 

Furthermore, it notes that at least two transactions were traced back to online addresses in Kindred, North Dakota, a small community with a population of around 1,000.

In addition to the North Dakota lawsuit, Binance and Zhao are defending themselves against another legal action in Manhattan federal court, where victims of previous attacks allege that Binance has provided a “clandestine” funding mechanism for Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad over several years. 

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Ethereum’s flagship developer conference, Devcon 8, is set to take place in Mumbai in the fourth quarter of 2026, according to the Ethereum Foundation and multiple reports.

The move brings one of the protocol’s biggest in-person gatherings to India, a country that, based on reports, added the most new crypto developers worldwide in 2024.

Organizers say the choice reflects where builders are growing, not only where markets trade.

India’s Ethereum & Developer Boom

Local groups and startups are named among the reasons for the pick. Based on reports, initiatives such as ETHMumbai and homegrown projects — including well-known layer-two teams that started in India — helped push the region into the spotlight.

ETHMumbai is already scheduled as a four-day conference and hackathon from March 12–15, 2026, which community members expect will feed more local talent into the lead-up for Devcon 8.

The site selection also raises clear questions about costs and rules. Reports have disclosed that India applies a 30% tax on crypto gains and a 1% TDS on many crypto transactions.

Those measures have not stopped builders from forming teams, but they may affect how foreign attendees and investors plan their trips and budgets for the event.

Logistics And Local Momentum

Choosing Mumbai signals more than a single event. Devcon is meant to gather core protocol researchers, app developers, and community organizers.

The Ethereum Foundation has thanked Devconnect hosts in Argentina for their recent work, showing how the Foundation rotates its major events.

Organizers will need to sort venues, visas, and travel plans for a large international crowd; these are typical, but significant, practical hurdles for any global conference.

For Indian startups and developers, the event is likely to deliver a boost. Reports suggest more investor attention could follow, and more partnerships may form as international teams meet local builders.

The presence of major conferences in the same city and year can increase hiring, funding conversations, and the visibility of smaller projects that otherwise would fly under the radar.

Devcon 8’s arrival in Mumbai is both a nod to the size of India’s developer community and a practical bet on global participation.

Organizers say they plan to make the conference accessible, but details on ticket prices, visa support, and local partnerships have not been fully released.

Attendance from overseas teams will hinge on those details as well as on how firms account for tax and compliance.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Recent developments have shown that China’s possible connection to Ripple’s XRP may be stronger than most realize. Versan Aljarrah, founder of Black Swan Capitalist, points out that the country already has indirect exposure to the token through specific financial channels. These pathways indicate that Ripple’s payment rails have long been facilitating international transactions, quietly integrating the altcoin into key global financial networks and regions. 

China’s Proposed Indirect Exposure To XRP Through Ripple

Aljarrah’s recent remarks reveal a more complex picture of China’s relationship with XRP. In his post on X, he pointed out that the country is already indirectly involved with the asset through major financial structures such as the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) and SBI Holdings, a Japanese financial services company. 

He also noted that cross-border payment corridors linking Asia, the Middle East, and Africa provide avenues where Ripple’s payment rails operate. These channels enable XRP to facilitate transactions in regions with potential financial ties to China, demonstrating that the cryptocurrency’s influence extends well beyond the Great Wall. 

By design, Ripple’s payment infrastructure enables fast, low-cost cross-border transactions. As a result, through established global payment corridors, XRP can become part of financial flows moving across continents, including areas influenced by China. This suggests that Ripple’s technology is integrated into the broader global payments landscape, potentially reaching markets with financial links to Chinese institutions. 

The involvement of the BRICS New Development Bank further positions the altcoin in networks aligned with emerging economies. Earlier this year, Aljarrah noted that BRICS’ reluctance to adopt US stablecoins came as no surprise. The Black Swan Capitalist founder revealed documents from the central banks of various regions, including China’s New Development Bank, that indicate that institutions have been building on the XRP network for years. This suggests that the connection with the cryptocurrency has been in motion for longer than people realize. 

XRP Emerges As Neutral Settlement Asset

In a separate X post, Aljarrah emphasized XRP’s broader value proposition as a neutral, free-floating settlement asset. He argued that in a multi-polar world, the US dollar alone cannot handle global transactions. As a result, the altcoin becomes essential to maintain liquidity and stability across international corridors. 

Aljarrah noted that smart investors recognize this potential and are positioning the token as a tool to navigate the structural changes in global finance. He also added that global institutions continue to invest and hold because of its status as a neutral settlement asset. 

On the technical front, Aljarrah has warned that the XRP market is showing signs of renewed fear. He cautioned that many investors who don’t fully understand what it means to hold the altcoin won’t survive the engineered volatility set to hit the market. According to the founder of Black Swan Capitalist, this volatility is intended to shake out weaker positions before the cryptocurrency reaches its true valuation.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is sounding the alarm over X’s new “show which country the account is from” transparency tag, arguing that the feature will be quickly undermined by spoofing while exposing some users to unacceptable privacy risk. X has recently expanded its “About This Account” surface, letting users see metadata such as an account’s country or region alongside creation details, a move the platform positions as a tool against manipulation and inauthentic behavior.

Ethereum Founder Sounds The Alarm

Buterin’s first post acknowledged near-term upside but framed the system as fragile under adversarial pressure. “In the short term it will have lots of positive effects,” he wrote. He then predicted that sophisticated operators will adapt faster than the platform can harden the signal: “the sophisticated actors will find ways to pretend to be from countries that they are not,” pointing to rentable passports, phone numbers, and IP infrastructure that can be used to manufacture plausible provenance.

His core asymmetry claim was blunt: “Getting a million accounts with fake location will be medium-hard, getting a single account with fake location, and then getting it to a million followers, will be easy.” In his view, the feature will drift from authenticity check to theater, with foreign influence accounts displaying Anglosphere tags to amplify credibility: “In six months, the actually-[random Eurasian country]-based political troll accounts with names like ‘Defend Western Civilization’ or whatever will all have ‘USA’ or ‘UK’ as their location tags.”

The Ethereum founder stressed that he was describing incentives, not endorsing them: “This is what I think will happen, not what I wish.” What he wants instead is a provenance system that yields “more visibility into how people from different communities think about different issues, in a way that is not easy to spoof,” and that defines communities through broader, emergent evidence rather than “a narrow set of highly legible credentials like countries.”

He concluded that “making such a system adversarially robust will not be easy,” a critique consistent with the crypto security view that identity signals decay once attackers can buy or synthesize them at scale.

Shortly after, the Ethereum founder sharpened his objection to consent and safety. “I thought about this more and I think responders are right that revealing the country non-consensually without offering any opt-out option (not even ‘stop using your account’) is wrong,” he wrote.

He noted that country-level disclosure is broadly non-identifying, yet warned that edge cases matter: “there are some people for whom even a few bits of leakage are risky, and they should not have their privacy retroactively rugpulled with no recourse.” Privacy advocates on X have echoed this concern, especially for users in authoritarian or conflict settings who fear location metadata can support harassment, surveillance, or legal targeting.

X has already faced questions about accuracy and implementation, with reports that some country tags appeared incorrect and the platform adjusted visibility while promising fixes. That instability reinforces the Ethereum founder’s warning: if tags are inferred from IP, app-store, or telecom data, they are vulnerable not only to deliberate spoofing but also to routine distortions like VPN use, SIM swapping, or account resales.

At press time, Ethereum traded at $2,800.

The third edition of the Crypto Content Creator Campus (CCCC) took place in the city of Lisbon. An event focused on monetization in the new Web3 era, creating more revenue opportunities and new ways to connect with and build communities in the emerging sector.

From November 14 to 17, the Bitcoinist team covered the events from the ground, speaking with influencers, key figures, and executives in the Web3 space.

ByBit CEO Declares a New Era for ‘FinFluencers’

The event kicked off with Ben Zhou, CEO and Co-Founder at ByBit. During his intervention, Zhou talked about the evolution of monetization, affiliate marketing, and the changes that are forcing an evolution in the sector.

From AI to regulations, Zhou declared that a new “Age of Compliance and Finfluencers” will emerge over the next five years. To Bybit’s CEO, this new era brings “unprecedented opportunities,” with a wider reach beyond crypto-native users, convergence of TradFi and Web3, and the evolution of exchanges into one-stop wealth platforms.

He noted that creators will need to decide whether to promote compliant or non‐compliant platforms as global licensing regimes continue to take shape, knowing that regulation will eventually catch up.

“People trust people faster than brands,” Zhou stated. “But as crypto becomes a regulated global financial system, the creators who build for the long term – not the fast shortcut – will be the ones who shape its future.”  

Maye Musk at the Crypto Content Creator Campus: Building A Community In The Web3 Era

On the event’s final day, Maye Musk, with decades of experience in fashion, nutrition, and media, discussed the foundations of a lasting personal brand that can be monetized, focusing on authenticity and staying “true to yourself.”

Musk was joined by Musa Tariq, former marketing executive at Airbnb, Apple, and Nike, and Philippe Ben Mohamed, Head of Digital Innovation at Tomorrowland. During the panel, they explored sustainability and how creators can ethically monetize their communities in an increasingly competitive Web3 space.

“Content creators should consider themselves entrepreneurs with the opportunity of multiple streams of income,” Tariq said. The executive highlighted the importance of identity, noting that it is pivotal to know what your brand stands for and how it’s differentiated. “Brands that stand the test of time, are ones that know who they are and are protective and selective over what they do,” Tariq concluded.

Leveraging AI to Optimize Content: a Conversation with Sergei Loiter

We had the opportunity to talk with Sergei Loiter, CEO of Search, AI, and AdTech at Yango, about the impact of AI in digital marketing, content creation, and monetization in the Web3 era. This is what he told us.

Q: From your perspective, how has Web3 reshaped digital marketing so far? Are we seeing real innovation in this space?

Sergei Loiter: AI has been part of digital marketing for a long time, but generative AI — the AI everyone talks about today — has completely reshaped content production and the way creators work. With these tools, you can create content faster, cheaper, and experiment more freely. They unlock creative possibilities that simply weren’t available before. AI tools are transforming the industry, especially content creation and production.

Q: Let’s talk monetization. How do you compare the current landscape between Web2 and Web3? And do you see AI as more of a disruptor or an enabler for creators?

Sergei Loiter: I don’t think there’s a huge difference between Web2 and Web3 when it comes to creators and monetization models — the main difference lies in the kind of content being created. AI, on the other hand, is a massive enabler. Those who learn how to use these tools effectively will stay ahead of the game.

Q: Lastly, what advice would you give a new creator who wants to start monetizing and growing their audience? What tools would you recommend?

Sergei Loiter: First, think of your content as a product. Start with your audience — who are they, what do they want, and where do they consume content? Once you understand that, treat different platforms as your distribution channels. Don’t stick to just one — diversify and tailor your content for each.

Monetization shouldn’t be the goal; it should be the outcome. If you focus on creating value and high-quality content, followers — and income — will follow naturally. Don’t be afraid to fail. Learn from your mistakes and keep evolving.