Из жизни альткоинов

Bitcoin is struggling to hold the $65,000 level as market sentiment drifts toward apathy following weeks of muted price action and declining participation. Volatility has compressed noticeably, and traders appear hesitant to commit fresh capital while macro uncertainty and liquidity constraints continue to weigh on risk assets. The lack of decisive momentum has left Bitcoin consolidating near a technically sensitive zone, where both bulls and bears seem reluctant to take aggressive positions.

A recent CryptoQuant report provides additional context through on-chain positioning data. According to the analysis, during the early February correction, the indicator dropped to roughly -0.0016, reflecting measurable weakness in underlying network activity. This development occurred after Bitcoin had already closed below the Anchored Volume Weighted Average Price (AVWAP) tied to the most recent halving on the weekly timeframe — a level often monitored as a structural reference for market positioning.

Trading below this anchored metric suggests reduced conviction among market participants and potentially weaker cost-basis support. While such conditions do not necessarily imply imminent downside, they typically correspond with transitional phases marked by uncertainty, subdued participation, and cautious capital deployment as the market searches for directional clarity.

Bearish Confluence Signals Echo Prior Cycle Dynamics

The report highlights that the last comparable bearish confluence following an all-time high occurred in May 2022, a period that ultimately preceded a prolonged corrective phase. According to the analysis, this comparison is based on a combination of structural indicators rather than isolated price action, specifically the BTC Growth Rate Difference between Market Cap and Realized Cap — an indicator developed by CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju — alongside Anchored VWAP levels tied to the third and fourth Bitcoin halvings.

The Growth Rate Difference metric evaluates whether market capitalization expansion is outpacing the underlying realized capitalization, which reflects the aggregated cost basis of coins on-chain. When this gap narrows or turns negative, it often signals weakening speculative momentum and reduced capital inflows relative to existing holder positioning.

At the same time, Bitcoin trading below key halving-anchored AVWAP levels suggests diminished structural support from long-term cost bases. Historically, these levels have functioned as reference zones for institutional and macro-oriented investors.

Together, these indicators do not guarantee further downside, but they do indicate a fragile market structure. Such conditions typically require either renewed liquidity inflows or sustained accumulation before a convincing recovery phase can develop.

Bitcoin Price Tests Key Support As Downtrend Persists

Bitcoin’s weekly structure continues to reflect a corrective phase, with price struggling to stabilize near the mid-$60,000 range after a sharp rejection from the $110,000–$120,000 zone seen late last year. The chart shows a clear transition from bullish expansion to distribution, followed by a sustained sequence of lower highs and lower lows — a pattern typically associated with weakening momentum rather than consolidation.

Technically, Bitcoin is now trading below major moving averages that previously acted as dynamic support. The shorter-term average has already rolled over decisively, while the longer-term trend line remains upward sloping but increasingly distant from current price action. Sustained trading beneath these levels usually reflects cautious sentiment and reduced upside conviction.

Volume spikes during recent selloffs suggest active distribution rather than passive drift lower. However, declining participation afterward could indicate partial exhaustion of aggressive sellers, potentially opening the door for a stabilization phase if demand returns.

From a structural perspective, the $60,000–$62,000 zone appears to function as immediate support, while the $70,000–$75,000 range represents the first meaningful resistance band. Unless Bitcoin decisively reclaims higher levels with strong volume, the broader trend remains fragile, with consolidation or additional downside risk still plausible.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

The crypto market has started the week under pressure as macroeconomic uncertainty and trade tensions unsettled investors, briefly pushing Bitcoin below $65,000 and driving a surge in online panic signals. The latest decline has closely followed global economic headlines rather than crypto-specific factors.

On Feb. 23, Bitcoin dropped to nearly $64,400 within hours, dragging major altcoins lower and wiping billions from total market value. The move coincided with escalating tariff concerns after U.S. President Donald Trump announced an increase in global import tariffs to 15%, amplifying fears of slower economic growth.

Fear Spikes as Retail Sentiment on Bitcoin (BTC) Deteriorates

Retail sentiment has weakened sharply as prices struggle around $65,000, with fear increasingly visible across market indicators. Online search behavior reflects growing anxiety, as data from Google Trends shows a record surge in searches for “Bitcoin to zero.”

Technical indicators show Bitcoin (BTC) struggling to maintain key support levels amid heightened selling pressure. Spot trading volumes dropped by nearly 59%, limiting liquidity and amplifying price swings. Derivatives markets also reflect caution: open interest fell to $19.5 billion, roughly half of January’s peak.

Price charts indicate further downside if support near $64,000 fails, with $60,000 as the key lower target. The 20-day moving average around $68,278 and the lower Bollinger Band near $64,098 show range-bound pressure, while mild outflows and clustered leveraged longs between $64,090–$64,536 could trigger liquidations.

Macro Shocks Weigh on Crypto Markets

Analysts linked the sell-off to a combination of weakening economic indicators and risk-off sentiment. U.S. housing data showed declining pending home sales, while currency markets reacted to expectations of tighter policy from the Bank of Japan, strengthening the yen and prompting global funds to reduce leverage.

Similarly, whale activity added pressure. On-chain data showed large holders moving coins onto exchanges, a signal often associated with selling. Spot trading volumes also dropped significantly, suggesting limited liquidity to absorb sudden moves.

The broader market followed Bitcoin lower. Ethereum fell roughly 5%, while other major tokens posted losses between 3% and 8%. Additional attention came after Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin sold millions of dollars worth of ETH, reinforcing concerns about near-term supply pressure.

Market participants now view the $60,000 level as a key support zone. Analysts warn that a sustained break below it could trigger large liquidations, while recovery above the mid-$60,000 range may stabilize sentiment.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

A man asking for just a few coins ended up hitting the jackpot. What started as a simple request for four Solana tokens turned into a massive payout when an experimental crypto agent transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of meme tokens to his wallet, giving the self-described beggar an unexpected windfall.

Lobstar Wilde, an AI agent run by an OpenAI staffer, appears to have emptied a meme-token wallet in a single public move that stunned parts of crypto Twitter and on-chain watchers.

Reports say the agent sent roughly $441,780 worth of tokens to an X user who only asked for four Solana coins to pay for an uncle’s medical treatment. The transfer, and the agent’s later flippant replies, raised questions about how much power a script should have over real money.

Agent Sent Money By Mistake To Solana Beggar

According to on-chain records and social posts, the Lobstar Wilde account publicly showed the transfer and then posted mocking messages about the recipient’s situation.

“If he died tomorrow I would laugh. Please send updates,” Lobstar said, while linking the transaction showing $441,788 worth of LOBSTAR tokens sent to Treasure David’s requested Solana wallet address on Sunday.

If he died tomorrow I would laugh. Please send updates.https://t.co/5D46ClTWZ0 https://t.co/CNMQf04yd6

— Lobstar Wilde (@LobstarWilde) February 22, 2026

Costly Error

Nik Pash, a developer involved with OpenAI’s “Codex” app for building autonomous programs, launched Lobstar Wilde on Friday with a goal of growing $50,000 worth of Solana tokens into $1 million through crypto trading.

But instead it appears to have sent most of its token stash away in a single transaction. The public thread and wallet movements were tracked in real time by a handful of crypto trackers and reporters.

Speculation has focused on a decimal slip. Reports note that the bot likely intended to send a modest token amount — the equivalent of four SOL — but misread token decimals and issued tens of millions of LOBSTAR tokens instead of a small handful.

Wrote a little retrospective pic.twitter.com/kDYt9yYmXP

— pash (@pashmerepat) February 23, 2026

That kind of mistake is common with custom tokens that use unusual decimal places. One X user who monitored the trade noted that a chunk of the received tokens was quickly swapped, netting about $40,000 for the recipient.

Guardrails Missing After Risky Setup

This was not a hack in the classic sense. The AI had the authority to move funds. It executed a transfer without human sign-off. That is a design choice, and it matters. Autonomous agents that trade need limits: caps on single transfers, multi-signature holds for large moves, or human confirmation gates.

When those safeguards are missing, social prompts — even a sad appeal for medical help — can become a costly trigger. Past incidents show a pattern: another AI-driven system lost 55.5 ETH after an attacker used an exposed control panel to force transfers. That episode heightened concerns about how agents are managed.

Across markets, Bitcoin’s price has been a quiet backdrop to this story. Recent trading saw BTC slip from levels near $67,000 toward the mid-$60,000s as broader risk sentiment shifted, and some of those swings coincided with headlines about trade policy from US leaders.

Traders watching the Lobstar Wilde saga noted how quickly a small social nudge can cascade in a market already sensitive to macro news.

Featured image from Vecteezy, chart from TradingView

The market tumbled sharply on Monday, with BTC briefly slipping below $65,000, as traders reacted to a mix of U.S. trade policy shifts, geopolitical risks, and looming economic data. The sudden losses erased weekend gains and pushed the market deeper into extreme fear, currently at 5.

Total crypto market capitalization fell roughly 3–5% within a day, sliding toward the $2.2 trillion mark. The downturn coincided with rising geopolitical risks and sweeping tariff measures announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, which unsettled broader financial markets and reduced appetite for risk assets.

Trade Tensions and Macro Risks Drive Sell-Off

Market volatility intensified after the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that parts of earlier tariff programs exceeded presidential authority. Shortly after, Trump introduced new global tariffs of up to 15% under separate trade powers, raising concerns about slower global growth and persistent inflation.

Escalating tensions between the United States and Iran added another layer of uncertainty, pushing investors toward traditional safe-haven assets such as gold. Crypto assets, which had previously benefited from a “digital gold” narrative, instead behaved more like high-risk investments during the latest market stress.

Large-holder selling also contributed to downside pressure, with increased transfers from whale wallets to exchanges signaling potential liquidation activity. Analysts noted that thin liquidity and weak conviction among buyers amplified price swings.

Economic Data And Policy Decisions in Focus

Investors are now watching upcoming economic indicators closely. Consumer confidence data, jobless claims, and producer price inflation figures are expected to shape expectations around interest rates. Recent inflation readings above forecasts have reduced hopes for near-term monetary easing by the Federal Reserve.

Meanwhile, the central bank is scheduled to inject roughly $14.6 billion into financial markets, a move some analysts believe could provide temporary support for speculative assets, though not equivalent to full stimulus measures.

Technology earnings are also on the radar, particularly results from Nvidia, whose performance often influences sentiment across both tech equities and crypto markets.

Liquidations Rise as Fear Dominates Sentiment

Market data shows more than $460 million in leveraged positions were wiped out during the latest decline, with long traders accounting for the majority of losses. Institutional flows have weakened as well, with exchange-traded crypto funds recording notable outflows.

Additional supply pressure emerged after mining firm Bitdeer sold its entire weekly production, while public commentary from industry figures, including Michael Saylor, suggested long-term optimism remains despite short-term weakness.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index has dropped into extreme fear territory, reflecting cautious positioning across the market. Until macroeconomic clarity improves, analysts expect volatility to remain elevated as traders weigh policy risks against longer-term adoption trends.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Bitcoin (BTC) could be gearing up for further losses, as a crypto analyst has issued a severely foreboding forecast. According to his analysis, Bitcoin’s current structure shows a predominantly bearish trend, with price expected to reach a bottom below $30,000 before any potential reversal to the upside. 

Bitcoin Repeats 2022 Style Bear Market

Crypto market analyst Jussy has published a new Bitcoin chart analysis on X, warning that the market may not have reached its final bottom yet. The chart compares the current weekly structure to Bitcoin’s 2022 cycle, showing nearly identical price behaviour following a double top formation and a bear flag that led to a major breakdown.

In 2022, Bitcoin first printed a double top near the upper resistance zone above $60,000. It was then rejected from the rounded top structure, reversing into a sustained downside trend. After this, the price experienced a sharp breakdown, followed by a three-week consolidation phase that developed into a bear flag pattern.

That consolidation acted as a brief pause before a bearish continuation, with BTC ultimately collapsing by another 38.96% from the bear flag range. Consequently, the final leg down erased roughly $11,095, carrying the price into a long-term support zone where the market finally hit a bottom and began to stabilize ahead of a recovery.   

Interestingly, Jussy argues that the current Bitcoin cycle is now reproducing the same bear market structure seen in 2022 almost perfectly. The right side of the chart shows that BTC formed a similar double-top pattern above the $120,000 region in 2025, only to roll over and break down sharply. This correction pushed the price below the key horizontal level near $74,321, which previously acted as support.

Following this drop, Bitcoin entered a consolidation phase that closely resembled the 2022 bear flag. The structure slopes downward, reflecting a major price compression following the first large wick to the downside. According to Jussy, Bitcoin is now in the third week of this consolidation window, the same point in time where the 2022 market transitioned into its final price crash.  

The Bottom Target

Using the same percentage decline from the 2022 breakdown, Jussy has predicted how low the Bitcoin price could fall before it attempts a notable recovery. His chart suggests that BTC has already begun its descent from the bear flag pattern, initially crashing below the $100,000 region and now trading near $65,000. 

Now, the analyst projects another corrective move of approximately 38% from the former support level around $74,320, potentially driving Bitcoin’s price down to roughly $46,199. The blue line below this zone in the price chart represents Bitcoin’s final downside target. Jussy predicts an even deeper decline to $28,301, marking BTC’s price bottom before any meaningful recovery takes hold. 

A thread sparked by Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas reignited one of crypto’s oldest arguments: whether Bitcoin’s core value proposition has been diluted as institutional intermediaries take center stage. What began as a reflection on crypto’s real-world utility quickly turned into a pointed dispute over whether BTC can credibly be called “debasement-resistant” while it remains wildly volatile.

Bitcoin Identity Debate Explodes on X

Balchunas weighed in after Cooper Turley, founder of Coop Records, posted that crypto feels “in the weirdest spot” since 2017 and that beyond speculation it’s “hard to see how it adds meaningful value to people’s lives.” Balchunas’ response framed Bitcoin’s novelty less as a product category and more as a monetary property set.

“Seeing this a lot. My two cents: the novel value of bitcoin is that it is user-run money that is both censorship and debasement-resistant,” Balchunas wrote. “Far as I can tell nothing has changed about that. However bc the current admin is so on board with it, the censorship part may seem less valuable, but just wait a few yrs, that could come in handy (it already does in many emerging/frontier mkt countries).. and debasement is alive and well, even dogs know that ain’t ever stopping.”

He argued that Bitcoin’s “youth” is a major driver of volatility, and that market price tends to hijack the narrative. “Price is a smoke screen that the most successful investors have learned to see through/ignore,” he added, extending the critique to traditional markets as well.

The “co-opted” question surfaced explicitly when Balchunas addressed long-time holders uneasy with BTC being increasingly accessed through Wall Street wrappers. His take: the asset didn’t change; the gatekeepers did.

“And for the OGs feeling like the establishment has co-opted their ‘outsider’ money.. all that really happened was the intermediaries got upgraded,” Balchunas wrote. “You went from paying high fees to SBF only for him to ‘lose’ your money to Larry Fink et al, who do same thing (outsourced your btc) but in a way that’s much cheaper and safer. Underlying btc hasn’t changed at all the whole time.”

Is Bitcoin Still A Debasement-Trade?

That framing didn’t satisfy critics who see Bitcoin’s volatility as fatal to the “debasement-resistant” label. Host of Chicago Future of Finance Oliver Renick pushed back sharply, arguing that a money that can swing the way Bitcoin does is effectively experiencing repeated “debasement events” by any practical standard.

“Debasement-resistant is biggest error here IMO,” Renick wrote. “If the dollar were down as much as btc can do on any given week, the world would go nuts, i.e, bitcoins volatility goes thru a debasement event like 3 times a year compared to the dollar where a 2% is a big deal. It’s rly bad money.”

Balchunas conceded the point partially on timeframe: “I think more longer term but it’s a fair point” but the exchange escalated when Renick questioned Bitcoin’s staying power. “And there it gets crushed again versus dollar and gold. Bitcoin may not make it to its 20th birthday, who knows,” he wrote.

Balchunas responded by pointing to recent performance as evidence that Bitcoin has “banked” substantial gains, citing “2023 and 2024” and “450%.” Renick’s rebuttal remained categorical: “Again , volatility intolerable of money.” Balchunas agreed Bitcoin is “too volatile rn to be widespread currency” and needs to “mature and settle down,” but rejected the conclusion that this reduces Bitcoin to censorship resistance alone.

“So that leaves you with just censorship resistance,” Renick wrote, suggesting that value might be far lower — “maybe $10k a coin” — before Balchunas returned to first principles: “It is debasement resistant, govt can’t dilute it- that’s true even if it is volatile.”

Balchunas closed by challenging the idea that shorter windows are dispositive, contrasting gold’s “20%” rise in “2023 + 2024” with Bitcoin’s “450%” move, and returning to the “young asset” thesis: it “gets ahead of itself then falls.”

The thread leaves a familiar fault line exposed. For Balchunas, institutional plumbing doesn’t change Bitcoin’s properties, and volatility is a maturity problem that can coexist with long-term dilution resistance. For critics, volatility isn’t a side effect, it’s the disqualifier, collapsing the “money” narrative and forcing a narrower censorship-resistance-only valuation debate.

At press time, BTC traded at $66,207.