Из жизни альткоинов

Quick Facts:

• Vitalik Buterin advocates for ‘AI as an interface’ and ‘AI as a participant’ as the most viable intersections of crypto and artificial intelligence.
• The creator economy faces a crisis of centralization, with platforms taking up to 70% of earnings, creating an opening for decentralized alternatives.
• SUBBD Token integrates AI tools like voice cloning directly into a Web3 payment structure to lower fees and improve workflow.
• Early data shows significant interest in this narrative, with over $1.4 million raised in the project’s presale phase.

The intersection of artificial intelligence and blockchain has become the dominant narrative of the 2024 crypto cycle. But how should these two powerful forces actually coexist?

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently weighed in, warning against ‘force-fitting’ AI onto blockchains just for the marketing hype. Instead, he advocates for specific synergies where crypto provides the decentralized guardrails for increasingly powerful AI agents.

Buterin identifies four key intersections: AI as a participant, interface, rules, or objective. His analysis suggests the most immediate use case is ‘AI as an interface’, tools helping users navigate complex Web3 protocols, or ‘AI as a participant,’ where autonomous agents transact on-chain.

This distinction matters. It separates vaporware from viable infrastructure. The market is finally rewarding projects that don’t just use AI as a buzzword, but use it to solve primary friction points like censorship and high fees.

While Ethereum focuses on the base layer, the application layer is heating up. The $85B content creation industry, long squeezed by centralized intermediaries taking massive cuts, is becoming the primary testing ground.

As the market digests Buterin’s roadmap, capital is rotating into platforms applying these principles to creator monetization. New entrants like SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) are emerging to bridge the gap between generative AI tools and sovereign ownership.

Read more about $SUBBD here.

Decentralized AI Infrastructure Meets Creator Utility

The core issue Buterin highlights in centralized AI models is the ‘black box’ problem, users can’t verify how decisions are made. For the creator economy, this looks like arbitrary bans and fee structures stripping up to 70% of earnings.

SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) enters this landscape not just as a payment rail, but as a comprehensive solution integrating that ‘AI as an interface’ concept. By merging Web3 transparency with advanced AI tools, the platform addresses the fragmentation forcing creators to juggle separate subscriptions for editing, analytics, and community management.

Under the hood, the platform uses Ethereum-based smart contracts to secure payments, while proprietary AI models handle the heavy lifting of content production. Features like the AI Personal Assistant and Voice Cloning tools allow creators to automate interactions without sacrificing personal connection.

This aligns with the broader trend where ‘AI agents’ are expected to drive on-chain activity. By offering token-gated access to these tools, SUBBD moves beyond simple speculation, creating a circular economy where the token actually has a job to do.

Learn more about $SUBBD here.

Presale Data Signals Appetite for AI-Native Monetization

While established large-cap AI tokens struggle with valuation concerns after the recent rally, early-stage capital is flowing into specialized verticals.

The financial data surrounding SUBBD Token reflects this shift. According to the official presale page, the project has already raised $1.4M, with tokens currently priced at $0.057495. This rapid accumulation suggests retail investors are hunting for ‘high-beta’ plays sitting at the intersection of two massive narratives: AI utility and the Creator Economy.

The project’s tokenomics also introduce a staking mechanism designed to reduce sell pressure, crucial for new launches. The protocol offers a fixed 20% APY for the first year to users who lock their tokens, incentivizing long-term participation over short-term flipping.

Beyond simple yield, the ‘platform benefit staking’ tier unlocks exclusive advantages like higher XP multipliers. This gamified approach to liquidity retention mirrors successful DeFi models but applies them to a consumer-facing product. For investors watching the Ethereum ecosystem, capturing value from both network growth and the specific application layer offers a hedged approach to the volatile AI sector.

Buy $SUBBD here.

This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The details regarding SUBBD Token are based on available presale data and should be independently verified before investment.

Соучредитель крупного поставщика оракулов Chainlink Сергей Назаров заявил, что текущий медвежий рынок от предыдущих отличают два фактора: отсутствие масштабных институциональных провалов и активное развитие активов реального мира (RWA).

Quick Facts:

• Binance holding 87% of the USD1 supply introduces significant liquidity and counterparty risks, contradicting the decentralized ethos of crypto.
• Capital is rotating from narrative-driven assets into fundamental infrastructure, specifically Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions.
• Bitcoin Hyper utilizes the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-speed, programmable smart contracts to the Bitcoin network.
• With over $31.3M raised and verified whale accumulation of $1M+, smart money is aggressively positioning in the $HYPER presale.

The narrative of ‘freedom money’ often clashes with the reality of centralized custody, and nowhere is that conflict more glaring than in the recent metrics surrounding USD1.

According to reports citing Forbes and on-chain analysis, Binance now controls approximately 87% of the total supply of the Trump-affiliated stablecoin.

That concentration is alarming. When nearly nine-tenths of a stablecoin’s supply sits on a single centralized exchange, the asset behaves less like a decentralized currency and more like a closed-loop exchange token. It creates a massive single point of failure; if liquidity shifts or regulatory pressures squeeze the custodian, the peg’s stability rests entirely on one entity’s solvency.

The market’s reaction has been telling. While retail investors chase political narratives, institutional capital is quietly rotating. Smart money appears to be pivoting away from centralized stablecoin plays and toward infrastructure that solves the ‘scalability trilemma’, specifically within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The logic is straightforward: political coins are volatile, but infrastructure that unlocks Bitcoin’s $1 trillion+ dormant liquidity is fundamental.

That capital rotation helps explain why alternative Bitcoin scaling solutions are seeing massive inflows. As concerns over USD1’s centralization mount, investors are hunting for yield in decentralized protocols.

This shift has created a perfect storm for Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), a project currently absorbing significant liquidity by promising to bring Solana-level speeds to the Bitcoin network.

Read more about $HYPER here.

Bridging Bitcoin Security With Solana Speed via SVM Integration

The core value proposition driving interest into Bitcoin Hyper is its technical architecture, which fundamentally differs from previous Layer 2 attempts like Stacks or Lightning. While older L2s often struggle with latency, Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) integrates the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly as a Layer 2 execution environment.

Why does that matter? Because the SVM is widely regarded as the industry standard for high-throughput execution. By decoupling the settlement layer (Bitcoin) from the execution layer (SVM), the protocol offers a hybrid beast: Bitcoin’s immutable security and Solana’s sub-second finality.

This modular approach allows developers to build DeFi applications and high-frequency trading platforms using Rust, all while settling transactions on the world’s most secure blockchain.

The architecture relies on a Decentralized Canonical Bridge, which addresses the most common vulnerability in L2s, the bridge itself. Rather than relying on a multi-sig fed by a few signers, the network uses a trusted sequencer with periodic L1 state anchoring. This ensures that while execution happens at lightning speeds on the L2, the final truth always resides on the Bitcoin mainnet.

For developers, this removes the friction of learning niche languages like Clarity (sorry, Stacks). If you can build on Solana, you can build on Bitcoin Hyper. This compatibility is likely a primary driver behind the project’s massive presale figures, opening the Bitcoin ecosystem to thousands of existing Solana devs.

Get your $HYPER today.

Whale Accumulation Accelerates as Presale Crosses Major Milestones

While the Binance-USD1 concentration paints a picture of centralized stagnation, the on-chain data for Bitcoin Hyper suggests a frenzy of accumulation. The project has raised an impressive $31.3M in its ongoing presale, a figure that eclipses most recent infrastructure raises.

The order flow indicates high-conviction buying rather than small retail speculation. A quick look at Etherscan records shows that 3 whale wallets have accumulated over $1M so far. The largest transaction of $500K occurred on Jan 15, 2026.

This specific timing, accumulating heavily well into the raise, suggests that large entities are positioning themselves before the Token Generation Event (TGE).

Investors are currently entering at a price of $0.0136754 per token. The economic model incentivizes early adoption through a high-yield staking program available immediately after purchase.

Notably, the project employs a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers. This short lock-up period is designed to mitigate the post-launch dump often seen in other ICOs, while still providing liquidity relatively quickly.

The sheer volume of capital raised, crossing the $31M mark, validates the market’s demand for a ‘Bitcoin with smart contracts’ solution. As liquidity leaves centralized stables like USD1, it’s finding a home in protocols that offer genuine yield through DeFi utility rather than custodial promises.

Buy $HYPER here.

Disclaimer: The content of this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Quick Facts:

• Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest continues to accumulate crypto-proxy assets, signaling strong institutional conviction despite market volatility.
• LiquidChain creates a Layer 3 infrastructure that merges Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment.
• The project minimizes security risks associated with wrapped assets by utilizing a verifiable settlement architecture.
• Early data shows over $533K raised for the protocol, highlighting demand for interoperability solutions.

Wall Street’s most vocal innovation advocate isn’t flinching.

Just days after adding to its crypto-adjacent positions, Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest executed another round of accumulation, reinforcing a strategy that seemingly ignores short-term chart chop in favor of long-term structural shifts.

While the exact allocation details often shuttle between her flagship ARKK fund and the Ark Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF), the pattern is undeniable: aggressive positioning in high-beta assets acting as proxies for the digital asset economy.

The dollar amount isn’t really the story here. The timing is.

When smart money doubles down within a 48-hour window, it typically suggests their internal models view current valuations as a dislocation from reality. Wood is betting that the infrastructure underpinning the digital economy, specifically exchanges and liquidity providers, is priced for failure rather than the adoption curve we’re actually witnessing.

But while Ark focuses on established giants (think Coinbase or Block), a different kind of capital flow is emerging further down the risk curve.

Sophisticated DeFi participants are turning their attention toward the fragmentation problem that plagues the current ecosystem. The narrative is shifting from ‘which chain wins’ to ‘how do we connect them all,’ creating a massive tailwind for Layer 3 (L3) infrastructure projects like LiquidChain ($LIQUID).

By addressing the friction between Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, these protocols aim to solve the very liquidity bottlenecks that institutional giants are forced to trade around.

Read more about $LIQUID here.

Institutional Confidence Meets The Liquidity Trilemma

The market often misinterprets Ark Invest’s strategy as mere speculation. But a closer look at the ‘buy the dip’ cadence reveals a thesis centered on convergence. Wood frequently argues that disparate technologies, AI, blockchain, and robotics, are merging. In the crypto sector, however, the reality is still one of stubborn separation.

Bitcoin liquidity remains trapped on Bitcoin; Solana’s high-speed execution is isolated from Ethereum’s TVL. It’s the industry’s most expensive inefficiency.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) enters this vacuum not as another competitor, but as a unifying execution layer. Operating as a Layer 3 protocol, it fuses the liquidity of the three largest ecosystems, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, into a single environment. The protocol’s architecture allows developers to deploy applications once and access users across all three chains simultaneously.

This effectively removes the ‘bridging risk’ that has historically led to billions in exploits, replacing complex wrapped-asset maneuvers with single-step execution.

For investors watching the macro moves by Ark, the parallel is clear. While institutions buy the equity of companies facilitating crypto access, the on-chain opportunity lies in the protocols facilitating crypto utility. The shift toward L3 infrastructure represents the next logical step in blockchain scalability, moving beyond simple transaction throughput to genuine interoperability.

$LIQUID is available here.

LiquidChain Presale Data Signals Early Infrastructure Demand

While public market heavyweights wrestle with ETF inflows and regulatory headlines, the presale market offers a rawer, real-time gauge of developer and speculator interest. The data surrounding LiquidChain ($LIQUID) suggests the market is hungry for solutions that simplify the user experience (UX) of DeFi.

According to live metrics, the project has successfully raised $533K in its ongoing funding round. With tokens currently priced at $0.0136, the valuation reflects an entry point typical of early-stage infrastructure plays before they hit mainnet discovery.

Unlike meme coins driven by social sentiment, infrastructure raises tend to track closer to the perceived utility of the underlying tech. The pitch here is ‘verifiable settlement’ across chains, a feature that appeals to institutional DeFi desks that can’t tolerate the security assumptions of standard bridges.

The economics of the $LIQUID token are designed to fuel this cross-chain machine. It functions as the transaction fuel for the Cross-Chain VM (Virtual Machine). As activity grows between the $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL ecosystems, the demand for the settlement layer naturally increases.

For early participants, the current price point of $0.0136 represents a bet on a future where liquidity is fluid rather than fragmented. Check the $LIQUID presale dashboard.

Buy $LIQUID here.

This article is for informational purposes only and doesn’t constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks, including high volatility. Always perform your own due diligence.

Quick Facts:

• Polymarket is suing Massachusetts to establish that prediction markets are federally regulated derivatives, not state-regulated gambling.
• The lawsuit represents a critical test for the crypto industry’s ability to operate under federal oversight rather than fragmented state laws.
• SUBBD Token leverages similar decentralized principles to disrupt the $85B creator economy, offering AI tools and lower fees than Web2 competitors.
• The conflict highlights a broader market trend toward platforms that offer user sovereignty and resistance to centralized censorship.

The battle for decentralized information markets just hit a breaking point.

Polymarket, the world’s largest prediction platform, has officially filed a lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This legal maneuver serves as a sharp counter-offensive to the Cease and Desist order issued by the state’s Attorney General, who accused the platform of running an unlicensed gambling operation.

Polymarket’s argument hangs on a single hook: federal preemption. The company contends its markets are financial derivatives under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not games of chance subject to state-level gambling laws.

That distinction isn’t just legalese, it’s survival. If prediction markets are classified merely as gambling, they face a fractured nightmare of 50 different state regulators. If they’re derivatives? They face a single federal framework.

This lawsuit follows the precedent set by Kalshi, a regulated competitor that recently scored a massive win against the CFTC, emboldening platforms to challenge regulatory overreach.

But this isn’t just about election betting or sports outcomes. The conflict highlights the friction between decentralized protocols and legacy frameworks that struggle to categorize Web3 innovation. The market’s reaction? Telling.

Rather than fleeing, liquidity in decentralized sectors has deepened. Investors are hunting for sovereignty and utility outside the reach of arbitrary restrictions.

While prediction markets fight for the right to trade truth, SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) is using this sentiment to disrupt the $85 billion creator economy. As users look for platforms that guarantee ownership and freedom from censorship, SUBBD is capitalizing on the shift toward decentralized monetization.

Explore the SUBBD Token ecosystem.

Disrupting The $85B Content Economy With AI And Web3

While the Polymarket case highlights the struggle for permissionless trading, the content creation industry faces a parallel crisis: centralization.

Right now, Web2 giants strangle the landscape, extracting up to 70% of creator earnings through fees and maintaining absolute authority over who can monetize. Sound familiar?

This centralized control creates a fragile ecosystem where influencers face arbitrary bans, demonetization, and payment processor restrictions. SUBBD Token has emerged to fix these inefficiencies by merging Web3 financial sovereignty with advanced AI tooling.

The project’s architecture is built to return value to the user (a concept foreign to most legacy platforms). By utilizing the Ethereum blockchain, SUBBD eliminates the intermediaries that typically siphon revenue, offering a transparent payment infrastructure that supports creators, fans, and even AI-driven influencers.

The platform integrates proprietary AI models directly into the ecosystem, offering features like AI Personal Assistants for automated interactions and AI Voice Cloning. Why does that matter? It lets creators scale their output without the burnout associated with traditional streaming.

From a market perspective, the utility here goes beyond simple tokenization. The platform introduces governance mechanisms that allow token holders to vote on feature rollouts and creator curation, fostering a community-owned ecosystem rather than a corporate dictatorship.

For investors watching the regulatory squeeze on platforms like Polymarket, SUBBD represents a tangible application of decentralized tech, solving a clear operational problem rather than relying on purely speculative trading. The integration of ‘HoneyHive’ membership tiers and token-gated exclusive content further aligns the token’s velocity with platform growth.

Read more about $SUBBD here.

SUBBD Presale Momentum Signals Demand For Decentralized Monetization

You can see the hunger for utility-driven crypto assets in the project’s early numbers. According to official presale data, SUBBD Token has already raised $1.47M, indicating strong capital inflows despite the broader market’s regulatory uncertainty.

The token’s current price of $0.057495 offers a vital entry point for investors looking to capitalize on the intersection of AI and the creator economy before the platform fully launches.

Financial incentives play a major role in this early accumulation phase. The protocol offers a robust staking mechanism, providing a fixed 20% APY for the first year to users who lock their tokens. This strategy is designed to reduce circulating supply volatility during the project’s initial expansion phase.

Plus, stakers unlock platform-specific benefits, including exclusive livestreams, daily behind-the-scenes drops, and XP multipliers that enhance their standing within the ecosystem.

Smart money seems to be betting on the convergence of two high-growth narratives: the explosion of AI tools and the necessity of censorship-resistant payments. While the Polymarket lawsuit dominates the headlines regarding regulatory jurisdiction, projects like SUBBD Token are building the infrastructure that renders traditional gatekeepers obsolete.

By offering a solution that combines lower fees, AI utility, and staking yields, the project positions itself as a hedge against the centralization risks currently plaguing both the prediction and content markets.

Buy your $SUBBD tokens here.

This article is for informational purposes only and doesn’t constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile assets; always conduct your own research before investing. The regulatory landscape is evolving and may impact project viability.

Крупнейшая по объему торгов криптобиржа Binance объявила о пополнении страхового фонда защиты своих клиентов SAFU (Secure Asset Fund for Users) еще на 4225 BTC.

Quick Facts:

• Bitcoin Hyper combines Bitcoin’s security with the speed of the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), addressing the critical need for scalable Bitcoin DeFi.
• The project has demonstrated massive market interest, raising $31.3M in its ongoing presale with tokens priced at $0.0136754.
• On-chain data highlights significant whale accumulation, including a single $500K purchase on Jan 15, 2026, signaling institutional confidence.
• By solving the “programmability gap,” Bitcoin Hyper aims to recapture capital that has historically migrated to Ethereum and Solana.

Bitcoin is fighting a multi-front war. While institutional flows via ETFs have stabilized the asset class, the battle for dominance in 2026 is being fought on entirely different terrain: utility.

As of late 2025, Bitcoin is struggling to reclaim the critical $98,000 level after a sharp correction, leaving traders questioning if the cycle has peaked. But price action only tells half the story.

The real ‘lost ground’ isn’t just market cap. It’s the hundreds of billions in decentralized finance (DeFi) activity that has migrated to Ethereum and Solana because of Bitcoin’s inherent programmability limits.

This matters (a lot) because history suggests capital rotation follows innovation. When Bitcoin stagnates, liquidity hunts for yield in high-performance ecosystems. But a new infrastructure layer is emerging to challenge that dynamic. By bringing smart contract capabilities directly to the world’s most secure blockchain, Layer 2 solutions are attempting to unify Bitcoin’s liquidity with Solana’s speed.

Leading this charge is Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER). By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) as a Layer 2 on Bitcoin, the project aims to recapture the market share Bitcoin has historically ceded to faster chains. With over $31.3M raised in its presale, the market is signaling a serious appetite for this hybrid approach.

Read more about $HYPER here.

The SVM Advantage: Why Smart Money is Watching

The core value proposition of Bitcoin Hyper lies in a specific architectural choice: utilizing the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) for execution while relying on Bitcoin Layer 1 for settlement. This isn’t just a technical upgrade; it’s a fundamental shift in how capital can be deployed on Bitcoin.

Traditional Bitcoin transactions are secure but notoriously slow and expensive, often costing upwards of $5–$10 during congestion. In contrast, the SVM architecture allows for sub-second finality and transaction costs that are fractions of a cent.

For developers, this solves the ‘scalability trilemma’ without abandoning Bitcoin’s security guarantees. The project features a Decentralized Canonical Bridge, allowing users to transfer $BTC seamlessly into a high-speed environment for DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, and gaming dApps.

Unlike previous attempts to scale Bitcoin that relied on complex sidechains, Bitcoin Hyper offers a developer experience compatible with Rust, the language powering Solana’s thriving ecosystem.

The risk? Execution. Bridging assets between a Turing-incomplete chain like Bitcoin and a high-performance environment is technically demanding. However, if the team pulls it off, this modular blockchain approach, separating execution (L2) from settlement (L1), could unlock trillions in dormant Bitcoin capital.

As technical analysts have noted, this infrastructure is critical for Bitcoin to move beyond a ‘store of value’ and become a productive asset in the 2026 economy.

Check the $HYPER presale.

Whale Activity Signals Confidence in the $HYPER Presale

While the broader market remains cautious, specific smart money actors are taking aggressive positions in infrastructure plays. On-chain data reveals significant accumulation for Bitcoin Hyper (view whale transaction).

According to recent records, two whale wallets have accumulated a total of $1M+ in $HYPER tokens. The biggest splash came on Jan 15, 2026, when a single wallet executed a purchase of $500K. This suggests high-net-worth individuals are positioning themselves ahead of the token generation event (TGE), likely anticipating the demand for a functional Bitcoin L2.

The financial metrics back up this bullish outlook. The project has raised an impressive $31.3M to date, a figure that stands out even in a crowded market. With the current token price set at $0.0136754, the valuation remains accessible compared to established L2s like Stacks or Optimism.

For retail investors, the staking incentives offer an additional layer of yield. Although the specific APY fluctuates, the protocol offers immediate staking after TGE with a short 7-day vesting period for presale participants. This structure encourages long-term holding rather than quick flips.

Investors should watch the timing here. As Bitcoin attempts to regain its lost ground above key resistance levels, the narrative is shifting toward ‘Bitcoin DeFi.’ Projects that can successfully deploy high-speed applications on Bitcoin are poised to capture the overflow of liquidity.

Bitcoin Hyper is positioning itself not just as a participant in this trend, but as the primary infrastructure layer enabling it. Join the $HYPER presale here.

Buy $HYPER here.

The content provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks, including market volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Always conduct your own research before investing.

Quick Facts:

• USDT maintaining the $1.00 peg during market crashes is a primary indicator of systemic health and future buying power.
• Rising Tether market cap during price dips suggests capital is re-arming for a buy, not exiting the space.
• While the general market seeks safety, smart money whales have moved over $500K into Maxi Doge, signaling appetite for high-leverage narratives.
• Monitor USDT for any deviation below $0.998; maintaining parity is the prerequisite for any market recovery.

The crypto market is currently undergoing a stress test that separates fragile assets from the real deal.

While Bitcoin and Ethereum navigate a sea of red, Tether (USDT) has once again become the market’s liquidity lifeboat, maintaining its critical peg despite immense pressure. For a stablecoin, a ‘price prediction’ isn’t about moonshots or capital appreciation, it’s about solvency, survival, and the velocity of money.

Data points to a massive flight to safety. As altcoins bleed double-digit percentages, Tether’s trading volume has spiked. This signals that traders aren’t exiting the ecosystem entirely; they’re just stepping to the sidelines. This accumulation of stablecoin reserves is historically a bullish signal for the medium term. Think of it as ‘dry powder’ waiting for a spark to deploy back into risk assets.

Tether’s immediate job is a rigorous defense of the $1.00 parity. Unlike speculative assets where volatility is a feature, for USDT, volatility is a failure state. The fact that Tether continues to process billions in daily redemptions without de-pegging suggests the market infrastructure is finally maturing.

However, this defensive posture in majors has created a split market: while cautious capital hides in USDT, aggressive ‘smart money’ is using this dip to rotate into high-asymmetry presale opportunities like Maxi Doge ($MAXI), betting on the recovery.

Read more about $MAXI here.

USDT Technical Outlook: Stability Signals Future Volatility

You can’t analyze a stablecoin with traditional chart patterns; you have to look at peg deviation and capitalization trends.

Currently, USDT is oscillating tightly between $0.9998 and $1.0002. This micro-volatility is actually healthy, it indicates arbitrage bots are efficiently closing gaps. The bullish thesis for the broader market hinges on Tether’s market cap, which continues to expand even as asset prices fall.

This divergence, prices down, stablecoin supply up, creates a ‘coiled spring’ effect for the next leg up.

The technical ‘resistance’ for Tether is simply trust. If USDT holds the $1.00 level through this correction, it validates institutional confidence. Analysts are closely watching the spread between USDT and USDC on centralized exchanges. A widening positive spread for USDT would indicate it’s the preferred haven for offshore leverage traders preparing to buy the dip.

Conversely, if the peg wavers below $0.995 for long, it could trigger a secondary capitulation event across the board.

Scenario planning for the coming weeks is straightforward:

• The Bull Case (for Crypto): USDT holds $1.00 firmly while its circulating supply increases by $1-2 billion. This confirms fresh capital entry and usually precedes a Bitcoin rally.
• The Base Case: USDT trades flat at $1.00 with stagnant supply. The market ranges sideways as traders wait for macro clarity.
• The Bear Case: A de-peg event below $0.998 driven by regulatory news. This would invalidate the safety thesis and force capital into fiat, draining the ecosystem’s liquidity.

Buy your $MAXI here. Whales Rotate Into Maxi Doge for High-Beta Upside

While conservative capital parks in Tether, on-chain analytics reveal a subset of high-net-worth wallets are aggressively positioning in early-stage assets to maximize the recovery phase.

Maxi Doge ($MAXI) has emerged as a primary target for this rotation, attracting liquidity from traders looking for leverage-style returns without the liquidation risk of futures trading.

The project differentiates itself through a ‘Leverage King’ culture (a rarity in the meme space), appealing directly to the retail cohort that views volatility as an opportunity rather than a threat.

Current data confirms significant institutional-sized interest: according to Etherscan records, 2 whale wallets have accumulated $628K in recent transactions ($314K, $314K).

Maxi Doge is currently in its presale phase, having raised over $4.58M. With tokens priced at $0.0002803, the project offers a low-cap entry compared to established meme coins.

The value proposition extends beyond simple speculation; the ecosystem includes holder-only trading competitions and a ‘Maxi Fund’ treasury designed to sustain marketing pressure, a critical component for meme token longevity.

However, potential investors need to be realistic about the risks. While Tether offers stability, Maxi Doge represents the extreme end of the risk curve. It’s a high-beta play designed to outperform standard market moves, but it carries the inherent volatility of unlisted assets. For traders bored by the stability of $1.00, researching Maxi Doge offers a look at where the risk-on capital is flowing.

Buy your $MAXI here.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile; conduct your own due diligence before investing.

Гендиректор аналитической платформы CryptoQuant Ки Янг Джу (Ki Young Ju) заявил, что у биткоина практически нет шансов показать бычий тренд в краткосрочной перспективе.

Quick Facts:

• Ethereum has established strong support above $2,000, with $2,150 serving as the critical invalidation level for the bullish thesis.
• A confirmed breakout above $2,850 is required to trigger a run toward the $3,500 analyst target.
• Institutional flows into ETH ETFs remain the primary catalyst to watch for a shift in short-term momentum.
• LiquidChain solves liquidity fragmentation across major chains, attracting speculative capital betting on a unified cross-chain future.

Ethereum’s price action over the last quarter hasn’t been about explosive growth, it’s been a masterclass in resilience.

While Bitcoin flirts with range highs and Solana captures retail attention, Ether ($ETH) has quietly established a formidable defensive line above the psychological $2,000 mark. It’s coiling.

As macro liquidity conditions ease, the asset looks ready for a decisive move.

Why the defense? A massive shift in holder behavior. On-chain data shows that despite lackluster price performance compared to competitors, long-term holders aren’t selling at these valuations.

This accumulation phase has kept $ETH firmly anchored, even as heavy outflows from legacy institutional products initially dampened post-ETF sentiment.

But stability is a double-edged sword. While $2,000 is a rock-solid floor, the lack of fireworks is pushing capital elsewhere. Traders seeking high-beta exposure are increasingly rotating into infrastructure plays and presales that promise the erratic, high-multiple returns $ETH currently lacks.

Frankly, the market looks bifurcated: one side playing the safe, long-term accumulation game with $ETH, and the other aggressively targeting emerging layer-3 protocols like LiquidChain ($LIQUID) to capture early-cycle alpha.

Read more about $LIQUID here.

Technical Resilience: Can Ethereum Reclaim $3,000 Before Q3?

Technically, Ethereum is trapped. The asset is painting a classic consolidation pattern on the daily chart, having successfully tested the $2,200–$2,300 zone multiple times. That confirms this area as a region of significant demand.

However, the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and the $2,700 horizontal level are currently acting as stiff resistance. With the Relative Strength Index (RSI) hovering near 48, momentum is neutral, leaving room for a breakout in either direction without immediate concern for overbought conditions.

The ‘slow bleed’ narrative? It largely ignores the massive institutional adoption of Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem. While critics point to L2s cannibalizing mainnet revenue, the aggregate Total Value Locked (TVL) across the Ethereum ecosystem remains dominant.

The key metric to watch in the coming weeks is the net flow into Spot ETH ETFs. After months of stagnation, a reversal to consistent positive inflows would likely provide the necessary buy pressure to chew through the sell walls at $2,850.

Price Scenarios and Outlook:

• The Bull Case: If ETH can close a daily candle above $2,850 on sustained volume, it invalidates the lower-high structure. We could see a swift move to test liquidity at $3,500, driven by short liquidations and renewed institutional interest.
• The Base Case: The asset continues to chop between $2,300 support and $2,700 resistance. This accumulation range could persist for several weeks as the market waits for clearer macro signals from the Federal Reserve.
• The Bear Case: A breakdown below $2,150 would be technically catastrophic. It would likely trigger a cascade toward the $1,800 region as leveraged longs get flushed out.

Traders watching this setup should monitor the volume on the next retest of $2,500; low-volume bounces suggest weakness, while a high-volume rejection of lower prices would confirm the bullish accumulation thesis.

Get your $LIQUID here.

Smart Money Rotates: LiquidChain Targets the Cross-Chain Liquidity Gap

While Ethereum battles for momentum, sophisticated capital is hunting for infrastructure plays that connect these fragmented ecosystems. The rotation is moving toward solutions that solve ‘bridging fatigue.’

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) has emerged as a focal point here, positioning itself as a Layer 3 infrastructure play designed to unify liquidity across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana.

The project differentiates itself with a ‘Deploy-Once’ architecture. This allows developers to build applications that access liquidity from multiple chains without complex wrapping mechanisms or vulnerable bridges.

That utility-first approach is clicking with early-stage investors. The numbers back this up: LiquidChain has raised over $533K to date, with tokens priced at $0.0136. The steady influx of capital during a choppy market suggests investors are betting on interoperability as the dominant theme of the next cycle.

The thesis for LiquidChain relies on its ability to serve as a high-beta correlation to the broader L1 market. If ETH and SOL rally, the demand for cross-chain execution generally expands, theoretically benefiting the protocols that facilitate that traffic. However, this sector carries risks.

As a presale asset, $LIQUID faces the dual challenges of delivering on its technical roadmap and navigating the volatility typical of unlisted tokens. It represents a speculative allocation for those betting that the future of DeFi is chain-agnostic rather than chain-maximalist.

For investors monitoring the space, the divergence is clear: ETH offers the stability of an established settlement layer, while projects like LiquidChain offer the speculative upside of solving the settlement layer’s connectivity problems.

Buy $LIQUID here.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto assets, including presales, are high-risk investments. Always conduct independent research.

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) used a new X thread on Feb. 9 to reframe his criminal case as “Biden’s political lawfare,” positioning himself alongside Donald Trump and former FTX executive Ryan Salame in what read like a direct appeal for a future pardon.

“Biden’s lawfare machine threw bogus charges at me, Donald Trump, Ryan Salame, etc.,” Bankman-Fried wrote. “To make the charges stick, they prevented us from even being allowed to respond.” He opened with a blunt claim about process rather than facts: “Rule No. 1 of Biden’s political lawfare: Don’t let them present evidence.”

SBF Cries ‘Gagged Trial,’ Claims DOJ Hid Evidence

SBF’s argument hinges on the idea that authorities and the court curtailed what the jury could hear. He repeatedly singled out Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over his trial, claiming the court “rubber-stamped everything Biden’s DOJ wanted” and “made sure I couldn’t show the jury the truth.”

The “truth,” as SBF cast it, is a solvency narrative: “So they lied, said I stole billions of dollars and bankrupted FTX. But the money was always there and FTX was always solvent.” He also argued that restrictions prevented him from advancing that line at trial, writing that he was “prohibited” from “pointing out FTX was solvent” and from “even mentioning lawyers.”

In the thread, SBF linked to a court filing he said was authored by his prosecutor, “Sassoon,” describing it as “a 70-page document on all the evidence they didn’t want the jury to see,” and he framed the episode as part of a broader political effort to “silence the truth.”

A significant chunk of the thread is dedicated to Trump’s New York hush-money bookkeeping case, which Bankman-Fried portrayed as a routine classification dispute blown into criminality. “Charged him with 34 crimes over his bookkeeping of an NDA expense—should it be legal, campaign, or personal?,” he wrote. “These questions come up all the time when you’re running a business, and it’s often unclear.”

He then drew a parallel between court-imposed limits on Trump and his own pre-trial detention. “They then got the judge to impose a gag order on Donald Trump,” he wrote. “Biden’s DOJ silenced me, too—getting Judge Kaplan to gag and then jail me before trial. President Trump also had Kaplan as a judge.”

Bankman-Fried also amplified Salame’s complaints about licensing advice and charging decisions, alleging prosecutors leaned on pressure tactics to force a plea, including claims involving Salame’s fiancée, assertions presented as fact in the thread but not accompanied by supporting documentation beyond links to Salame’s posts.

The reaction underneath was unsparing, with multiple industry figures interpreting the thread less as a legal critique than a political pitch. “You’re a Delusional criminal who is now angling for a pardon,” wrote trader Bob Loukas. Attorney Ariel Givner was even more direct: “We GET it. You want a pardon from Trump.”

At press time, FTT traded at $0.3021.

Quick Facts:

• Bitcoin is consolidating under $70k; technicals suggest a breakout toward $85k-$100k if resistance at $72.5k clears.
• The primary downside risk is losing the $60k support, which could trigger a liquidation cascade toward $52k.
• Bitcoin Hyper uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-speed smart contracts to Bitcoin, raising over $31M in early capital.
• On-chain metrics show accumulation, but low volume on current rallies warrants caution regarding potential fake-outs.

Bitcoin is currently engaged in a tense standoff with the psychological $70,000 barrier, a ceiling that has held firm for weeks.

The market is witnessing a classic consolidation pattern: volatility compressing, leverage flushing, and price trading in a tight range. Historically, this quiet precedes a violent move. While retail traders grow impatient with the chop, on-chain data tells a different story beneath the surface.

The main culprit for this hesitation? A messy mix of macroeconomic ambiguity and short-term profit-taking. Yet, the macro thesis remains solid. With institutional ETF flows providing a soft floor and global liquidity cycles turning, the math favors a breakout. The question isn’t if Bitcoin breaks higher, but when the post-halving supply shock finally dries up the available liquidity on exchanges.

This compression phase forces capital to make a choice. While Bitcoin prepares for its next leg up, risk-tolerant capital is already rotating. Traders looking to maximize the coming cycle are hedging spot holdings with high-beta infrastructure plays.

That rotation suggests that while Bitcoin targets a conservative 2x, emerging protocols like Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) are capturing attention (and liquidity) for their potential to fix Bitcoin’s scaling issues before the bull market truly heats up.

Learn more about $HYPER here.

Technical Outlook: The Path to $100K Requires a Clean Break

Despite the immediate resistance at $70,000, Bitcoin’s high-timeframe structure remains aggressively bullish.

Analysts are eyeing the convergence of the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a setup that historically signals trend continuation rather than reversal. Plus, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has reset from overbought territory. That gives the asset room to run without overheating.

For the bulls to win, Bitcoin needs to reclaim the $72,500 level with real volume. A daily close above that zone would invalidate the bearish divergence and open a path toward price discovery.

Most technical models project that once $74,000 clears, the psychological vacuum pulls price rapidly toward the $85,000–$90,000 range. Consensus suggests a breakout here puts the $100,000 milestone in play by late Q3, fueled by corporate treasury adoption and ETF rebalancing.

However, risks remain. If the $60,000 support fails during a macro shakeout, the structure weakens significantly.

• Bull Case: A high-volume breach of $72,000 targets $88,000 in the medium term.
• Base Case: Another 2-3 weeks of chop between $64,000 and $71,000.
• Invalidation: A weekly close below $58,500 signals a deeper correction is needed to find liquidity.

Watch spot volume on Coinbase closely. If price pushes up while volume drops? It’s likely a fake-out.

Smart Money Rotates to Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) for L2 Utility

As Bitcoin battles resistance, sophisticated investors are looking at the rails that will power the network’s future. The focus is shifting toward Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the first Bitcoin Layer 2 integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).

While Bitcoin serves as pristine collateral, digital gold, it’s frankly too slow and expensive for DeFi. Bitcoin Hyper solves this by anchoring to Bitcoin for security while using SVM for high-speed execution.

The market’s appetite is clear. According to the official presale page, Bitcoin Hyper has raised $31.3M, with tokens currently priced at $0.0136754. That capital inflow suggests strong conviction in the ‘Bitcoin DeFi’ narrative.

By allowing developers to write in Rust and deploy dApps that settle on Bitcoin, the project bridges the gap between Bitcoin’s $1.3 trillion liquidity and modern functionality.

Whale activity backs this up. Etherscan records show that 3 whale wallets alone have accumulated $1M. The largest transaction, a $500K buy, occurred on Jan 15, 2026. (Note: Large-scale buy orders during a presale usually indicate institutional due diligence is finished).

Still, caution is necessary. Layer 2 protocols are high-risk environments subject to execution hurdles. While the promise of high APY staking and a Decentralized Canonical Bridge is appealing, $HYPER remains a beta play on the ecosystem’s expansion.

Buy $HYPER here.

This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile assets. The content provided is for informational purposes only. Your should conduct your own independent research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.

BitMine Immersion Technologies, возглавляемая сооснователем Fundstrat Global Advisors Томом Ли (Tom Lee), докупила 40 613 ETH на $83,2 млн, несмотря на нереализованные убытки в $7,5 млрд.

В Татарстане зафиксирован очередной случай мошенничества с криптовалютами. 37-летняя жительница Нижнекамска потеряла 3,6 млн рублей, вложив средства в фиктивный криптопроект.

A long‑running dispute between the US banking sector and the crypto industry is widening, with tensions now extending beyond stablecoin yields to a new regulatory flashpoint: “skinny” Federal Reserve (Fed) master accounts. 

According to a report published Monday by Crypto In America, the disagreement is emerging as another obstacle in an already strained relationship between traditional finance and digital asset firms.

Crypto‑Bank Tensions Grow

The issue comes as lawmakers continue to struggle with the passage of the anticipated crypto market structure legislation known as the CLARITY Act, which has been delayed in part by unresolved questions around whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer yield on stablecoins. 

Now, attention is shifting to the Federal Reserve’s proposal to introduce “skinny” master accounts, a limited form of Fed access that would allow eligible fintech and crypto firms to connect directly to the central bank’s payment infrastructure without receiving full banking privileges.

Eleanor Terret, the journalist closely tracking the bill’s progress in Washington, reported that banks and crypto advocates are sharply divided over the proposal. 

Terret noted that the disagreement became clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve last Friday by a broad range of stakeholders, including crypto companies, industry groups, banking trade associations and individual commentators.

Circle (CRCL) argued that granting limited Fed access would strengthen the overall payments system by increasing its resilience. The Blockchain Payments Consortium said skinny master accounts could help remove uncompetitive practices that disadvantage consumers and concentrate risk within a small number of large banks. 

However, not all crypto firms expressed full approval. Anchorage Digital described the proposal as a step in the right direction but criticized its limitations. 

The company noted that the accounts would not provide direct access to the Federal Reserve’s automated clearing house, nor would they allow firms to hold balances or earn interest on reserves—features Anchorage believes are necessary for meaningful participation in the payment system.

Fraud And Oversight Concerns 

Banks, by contrast, raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many of the entities likely to qualify for skinny accounts lack a long‑term supervisory history and are not governed by consistent federal safety and soundness standards. 

The group also pointed out that many crypto firms operate under regulatory frameworks that are still evolving. The Colorado Bankers Association echoed those worries, cautioning that expanded access could create opportunities for faster‑moving fraud.

The Federal Reserve has said it will review all submitted comments before drafting formal rules for skinny master accounts. Fed Governor Christopher Waller told Crypto In America that he hopes the central bank will be able to release a proposal for those rules in the fourth quarter of this year.

The debate is unfolding just ahead of a scheduled meeting at the White House on Tuesday, where officials are expected to bring together representatives from both the crypto and banking sectors in an attempt to ease tensions, particularly around the issue of stablecoin yield. 

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

South Korean regulators have announced an inspection of local crypto exchanges and improved measures to address regulatory “blind spots” following Bithumb’s $40 billion Bitcoin (BTC) payment error.

New Task Force To Review Crypto Exchanges’ Practices

On Monday, South Korean financial authorities announced they will step up their efforts to regulate the crypto industry and foster a trustworthy trading environment for digital assets, local news outlets reported.

Following the “ghost Bitcoin” incident at Bithumb, South Korea’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange, the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)’s Governor Lee Chan-jin revealed an inspection of local exchanges and emphasized the need for improved legislation.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Bithumb accidentally distributed 620,000 Bitcoin, worth over $40 billion, to 249 users participating in the exchange’s “random box” promotional event due to an employee’s mistake.

Although 99% of the BTC were recovered, the incident raised serious concerns about the crypto exchange’s internal controls. Notably, Bithumb held 175 BTC in its own books, and less than 50,000 Bitcoin between its own assets and customer-held assets, according to a regulatory filing from last year.

This means that the exchange’s system failed to block the irregular transaction, distributing assets that did not actually exist to users and distorting market prices.

“The so-called ghost Bitcoin incident clearly revealed that, beyond a mere input error, there are structural weaknesses in internal controls and ledger management systems of cryptocurrency exchanges,” said Kim Jiho, a spokesperson for the ruling Democratic Party, in a Saturday briefing.

Meanwhile, the FSS Governor affirmed that the “incident bluntly exposed the structural flaws in virtual asset trading systems,” adding, “There are many aspects of the case that we view as extremely serious.”

As a result, the FSS, alongside the Korean Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU), the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), formed an emergency task force to organize follow-up measures and review industrywide practices.

The reports noted that the task force plans to examine Bithumb and other domestic exchanges’ virtual asset reserves, management practices, operational conditions, and internal control systems.

“We will carry out planned investigations into major high-risk areas in the virtual asset market where unfair trading practices, such as market manipulation and the dissemination of false information, are a concern,” Lee stated.

Regulators To Address ‘Structural Vulnerabilities’

The FSS Governor also warned that the process could be escalated into a full investigation if any illegal activities are revealed, adding that the incident would be reflected in the long-awaited Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which is expected to serve as a comprehensive framework for the entire industry.

“While we are drawing up the second phase of virtual asset legislation, measures to address structural vulnerabilities at exchanges, exposed by the recent Bithumb incident, will be reflected,” Lee declared.

“As virtual assets are being incorporated into the legacy financial system, there remains the task of strengthening the regulatory and supervisory framework. This could serve as an opportunity to put the system in place properly,” he continued.

It’s worth noting that South Korean financial authorities are reportedly considering introducing a system to prevent suspects from hiding or withdrawing unrealized profits from market manipulation related to crypto assets.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed last month that it is exploring the proposal for prosecution measures against suspects of crypto asset price manipulation, as some officials consider that there’s a need “to complement the current Virtual Asset User Protection Act by implementing measures for the confiscation of criminal proceeds or the preservation of recovery funds in advance.”

The measure would limit fund outflows, such as withdrawals, transfers, and payments from a crypto-related account suspected of obtaining illicit gains through typical market manipulation tactics.

On-chain data shows Bitcoin buyers from 2025 and 2026 realized $1.5 billion in losses per day on the recent move down in the cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin Net Realised Profit/Loss Has Plunged Recently

In a new post on X, on-chain analyst Checkmate has talked about how loss-taking has looked during the latest Bitcoin price crash. The indicator cited by Checkmate is the “Net Realised Profit/Loss,” which measures the net amount of profit or loss that investors are realizing through their transactions.

The metric works by going through the transaction history of each coin being sold to see what price it was moved at prior to this. If the last selling price was greater than the latest spot price for any token, then that particular coin is now being moved at a net loss. On the other hand, the previous selling price being less suggests the sale is leading to profit realization.

In each case, the degree of profit/loss involved is equal to the difference between the two prices. The Net Realised Profit/Loss sums up this value for both types of sales and then finds their net value.

When the value of the indicator is greater than zero, it means the investors are selling their coins at a net profit. Similarly, it being negative implies loss-taking is the dominant mode of selling.

Now, here is the chart for the Ethereum Net Realised Profit/Loss shared by Checkmate that shows the trend in its 7-day exponential moving average (EMA) value separately for buyers from different years:

As displayed in the above graph, the Ethereum Net Realised Profit/Loss fell into the negative zone for the 2025 and 2026 buyers as the market crash took place. This suggests that buyers from the past year participated in loss realization.

“Class of 2025 and 2026 collectively puked out $1.5B/day in losses on the move lower, equivalent to the June 2022 low at $17.6k,” noted the analyst. Buyers from other years also participated in selling during the drawdown, but their distribution mostly involved profit-taking.

In related news, the unrealized loss in the market has also hit a value similar to that witnessed during the 2022 bear market, as on-chain analytics firm Glassnode has pointed out in an X post.

From the chart, it’s visible that the Relative Unrealized Loss, an indicator representing the unrealized Bitcoin loss as a percentage of the market cap, has risen to 16% recently. “Current market pain echoes a similar structure seen in early May 2022,” explained Glassnode.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $69,300, down more than 11% over the past week.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that progress on the long‑anticipated crypto market structure legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, appears to have stalled in Congress. 

His remarks come as lawmakers remain divided over key issues, most notably stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve’s proposal for so‑called “skinny” master accounts, a topic earlier highlighted by Crypto In America.

Stablecoin Yield Fight Fuels CLARITY Act Stalemate

Waller’s comments quickly drew reaction from market observers. Crypto analyst MartyParty noted on X that the governor’s assessment reflects the ongoing deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act.

According to MartyParty, the delay is not accidental. He argued that resistance from the banking sector has intensified, particularly around the treatment of stablecoin yields and rewards. 

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms such as exchanges and digital wallets should be allowed to offer interest‑like returns or incentives on stablecoins held by users.

Crypto industry advocates contend that yield‑bearing stablecoins encourage adoption, improve efficiency, and increase competition in the payments market. Banking groups, however, strongly oppose this view. 

They argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, warning that higher returns—often in the range of 3% to 5% or more, compared with near‑zero yields on many bank accounts—could trigger massive deposit outflows. 

In MartyParty’s assessment, banks are concerned that passage of the CLARITY Act could move trillions of dollars onto crypto‑based payment rails, breaking what he described as the banking sector’s “closed‑loop system” and putting pressure on long‑established profit models.

Crypto And Banks Head Back To White House  

Amid rising tensions, MartyParty also reported that the White House has scheduled a second meeting for Tuesday, February 10, aimed at easing friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over stablecoin yield payments. 

The meeting is expected to include senior policy officials rather than company chief executives, along with representatives from banking and crypto trade associations.

Another major point of contention is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account model. Under this framework, eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

The debate around skinny accounts became especially clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve. Crypto firms and industry groups generally expressed support, while banking organizations responded with caution or outright opposition. 

Banking groups raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many entities likely to qualify for payment accounts lack a long‑term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards. 

Governor Waller indicated that he hopes the Federal Reserve will be able to publish proposed regulations for skinny master accounts in the fourth quarter of this year.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com 

Bitcoin is struggling to hold the $70,000 level as the market shows clear signs of weakening demand following weeks of sustained selling pressure. After several failed recovery attempts, price action continues to reflect fragile sentiment, with liquidity thinning and volatility increasing. Investors remain cautious as macro uncertainty, declining risk appetite, and persistent outflows from speculative assets weigh on the broader crypto market.

A recent analysis from Axel Adler indicates that the bear market underway since November 2025 has entered a deeper phase following last Friday’s sharp decline, which pushed total drawdown to roughly 46% from the cycle peak. This magnitude of correction historically marks a transition from an early pullback into a more mature bearish stage, where sentiment typically deteriorates further before stabilization occurs.

The report highlights that Bitcoin has approached the 1.25× Realized Price Band, a historically significant level that often separates standard corrections from capitulation phases. When price tests this boundary, market structure tends to become highly sensitive to liquidity shifts and investor positioning.

Whether Bitcoin can hold above this zone will likely determine the short-term direction. A sustained breakdown could signal deeper capitulation dynamics, while stabilization may provide the foundation for eventual accumulation.

Bear Market Drawdown Signals Transition Into Deeper Phase

Adler notes that the Bitcoin Bear Market Correction Drawdowns chart places the current 2025–2026 decline in historical context, comparing its magnitude with previous bear cycles. The metric tracks percentage drawdowns from each cycle’s all-time high on a logarithmic scale, allowing a clearer assessment of structural market stress rather than nominal price moves alone.

The current bear phase began after Bitcoin topped near $124,450 in October 2025. By November, the market had entered a persistent downtrend, with the correction expanding from roughly −20% to −30% initially before accelerating to around −46% by early February. Notably, the pace intensified sharply: the drawdown moved from approximately −28% on January 28 to −46% by February 6. A modest rebound followed, with price briefly stabilizing near $70,700, still implying a drawdown of roughly −43%.

Historically, earlier cycles saw significantly deeper declines, including roughly −93% in 2011, around −83% in both the 2013–2015 and 2017–2018 bear markets, and about −76% during the 2021–2022 correction. Against that backdrop, the current decline appears less severe so far.

Adler argues that three months of persistent downside momentum signal entry into a deeper corrective phase. Stabilization between −40% and −50% would suggest moderating cycle volatility, while a drop beyond −50% could reopen downside targets toward the −60% to −70% range.

Bitcoin Tests Critical Support As Downtrend Pressure Intensifies

Bitcoin’s latest price action shows a clear deterioration in market structure after the sharp breakdown toward the $65K–$70K region. The chart highlights a decisive loss of short-term support, followed by an aggressive selloff that pushed price well below the key moving averages, signaling sustained bearish momentum rather than a simple correction.

Notably, BTC is trading under the 50-, 100-, and 200-period moving averages, all of which are beginning to slope downward. This alignment typically reflects a transition from consolidation into a more established downtrend. The rejection near the mid-$90K area earlier in the cycle appears to have confirmed a lower high, reinforcing bearish continuation risk.

Volume dynamics also deserve attention. The sharp spike during the most recent drop suggests forced selling, likely driven by liquidations and panic positioning. Historically, such spikes can either mark capitulation or precede further downside if follow-through selling emerges.

From a structural perspective, the $65K zone is now critical. Holding above it could allow stabilization and a potential relief bounce. However, a sustained breakdown below this level would likely expose the next demand region closer to the low-$60K range, where stronger historical support may emerge.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

After one of its sharpest swings in over a year, Bitcoin (BTC) is attempting to find balance. Prices have stabilized above $70,000 following a rapid drop to $60,000 last week, but the calm has done little to settle the broader debate; is this a completed reset, or just a pause before another move lower?

The recent volatility has flushed out leverage, forced large players to cut risk, and shifted sentiment from optimism to caution. While dip buyers have returned, on-chain data, derivatives metrics, and macro signals suggest the market remains in a fragile holding pattern rather than a clear recovery.

Whales Step Back as Leverage Unwinds

One of the clearest signs of the reset came from whale activity. On-chain data shows that the so-called Hyperunit whale sold more than $340 million in Bitcoin, sending the funds to Binance after months of aggressive, leveraged trading across crypto markets. The move followed a major liquidation on a large Ethereum position, which reportedly resulted in losses of roughly $250 million.

At its peak, the wallet held over $11 billion in Bitcoin. Holdings have since fallen to about $2.2 billion, signaling a shift away from expansion toward capital preservation.

The selling coincided with a broader decline in Bitcoin open interest, which fell from around $61 billion to near $49 billion, pointing to widespread deleveraging rather than fresh short positioning.

This reduction in leverage has eased immediate downside pressure but has also reduced momentum, leaving Bitcoin without strong directional conviction.

Bitcoin Price Stabilizes, But Signals Remain Mixed

Bitcoin was trading around $70,000–$71,000 in Asian hours on Monday, holding steady after last week’s rapid rebound. Technical indicators still show weak momentum, with subdued volume and no clear signs of either buyers or sellers being firmly in control.

Market participants are split. Some analysts argue that the recent washout has removed excess risk and created conditions for a healthier base. Others warn that similar rebounds in this cycle have turned into bull traps, especially when driven by short-term traders rather than long-term accumulation.

Support near $60,000 remains a key level to watch, while resistance between $73,000 and $75,000 is seen as a test for any sustained upside.

Macro, Sentiment, and Structural Questions

Beyond price action, broader factors are shaping the debate. Global equity markets rebounded, helping risk assets stabilize, while US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded modest inflows as investors selectively bought the dip.

At the same time, concerns around long-term narratives, from Bitcoin’s safe-haven role to emerging discussions about quantum computing risks, continue to hover in the background.

Bitcoin’s ability to hold above $70,000 suggests the forced reset may be largely complete. Whether that turns into a durable recovery or another leg lower will depend on liquidity, conviction from larger players, and how markets respond to upcoming macro data.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart on Tradingview